SNIPERS guide!

Remove this Banner Ad

SMUU28 said:
I think he got asked to leave. He hasn't played since the doveton game i think. Well done to Dandy if they did tell him to piss off, you don't need that in any league or any club. On the Whisper too number 10 from skye should get 10 weeks for his cowardly act on the weekend. Kicked a bloke as hard as he could while he lay on the deck, absolute coward. Keep your eye's on the tribunal.
Click to expand...

No.14 has not played since Skye game, and from what I heard he had to go to tribunal for his cowardly act. Not to sure as how he was reported, maybe someone from Skye had video evidence of his hit behind play, and submitted it to the SFL. He has not been back at the club since then. To my knowledge, not wanted back again or to be asked back again.
 
another sniper out there is Shannon Lowater from stpauls reserves. Mountain of a man but just needs to learn to focus his agression on the ball not oppositions heads.

Has potential to be a great player but chooses to throw haymakers instead.
 
the comp is full of snipers , highett has many but none of them r good enough to make i diff!! alot of sh#t blokes at that club!
chelt just try n look tough!
lemon huge sniper n did change games by doin wat he does best
 

Log in to remove this ad.

superfreak said:
any examples tiger or just a comment out of envy??

how about the st pauls bloke who was reported for eye gouging yesterday, does that class him as a sniper?
Click to expand...

i wasn't close to the action for the st pauls player that was reported but it was the cheltenham player that was throwing punches in the pack before the eye gouging incident. Not saying that it's ok to retaliate because eye gouging is a pretty bad thing but i didn't see it so until he's found guilty ill hold my tongue.

Number 25 was just hitting people late, clenched fist in his tackles and just generally looked like all he wanted to do was hurt someone not get the pill
 
Tiger bait said:
i wasn't close to the action for the st pauls player that was reported but it was the cheltenham player that was throwing punches in the pack before the eye gouging incident. Not saying that it's ok to retaliate because eye gouging is a pretty bad thing but i didn't see it so until he's found guilty ill hold my tongue.

Number 25 was just hitting people late, clenched fist in his tackles and just generally looked like all he wanted to do was hurt someone not get the pill
Click to expand...

he has been in our best 5 players in all but one game. tackling blokes hard is hardly sniping, he tackles hard but fair and if its late he gets penalised. he actually got sent off for asking the umpire "what was the free kick for".
 
superfreak said:
he has been in our best 5 players in all but one game. tackling blokes hard is hardly sniping, he tackles hard but fair and if its late he gets penalised. he actually got sent off for asking the umpire "what was the free kick for".

onto the umpiring.........frustrating day yesterday (and the past three weeks actually).
its like umpires have an agenda with chelt and go out of their way to make sure that they give them nothing all day. no wonder blokes are getting frustrated.
how about the st pauls bloke smashing into the back of the young chelt player in the goal square after he kicked a point and no free was paid. it just highlighted the inconsistency and hidden agenda of the umpiring department.
the younger umpire yesterday was pathetic. he was even mouthing off at the chelt players. you cant be a smart arse towards senior players if you are that age, its not professional and if he was umpiring a div 3 game i wouldnt be surprised if he gets belted.

st pauls deserved to win though yesterday. that 7 goal 2nd term was a killer. they simply couldnt miss!!
Click to expand...

its all a big conspiracy against cheltenham.. ooooooooo:thumbsdown:
 
one_glove said:
its all a big conspiracy against cheltenham.. ooooooooo:thumbsdown:
Click to expand...

no conspiracy mate. beaten by a better side on the day the last two weeks. just frustrated with inconsistency in decisions that 99% of the time go the other way, surely in a two horse race it should be about 50-50.
 
superfreak said:
no conspiracy mate. beaten by a better side on the day the last two weeks. just frustrated with inconsistency in decisions that 99% of the time go the other way, surely in a two horse race it should be about 50-50.
Click to expand...
14 to 27 in favour of sandown yesterday, consistency is all we ask for, if your going to pay them pay them both ways all day, not just for one specific team, and of course most of them in front of goal:rolleyes:
 
Someone told me that all umpires are lacking an essential chromosone! Not my words some one elses. Personally i think they are alright. Can i get a YAY UMPS!
 
SMUU28 said:
14 to 27 in favour of sandown yesterday, consistency is all we ask for, if your going to pay them pay them both ways all day, not just for one specific team, and of course most of them in front of goal:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

in the two weeks leading up to the weekend's game the count was 17-63 in favour of our opposition......plus about 10 50m to 0

after the weekend, i reckon we might have cracked the ton!!:rolleyes:
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Remove this Banner Ad

SNIPERS guide!

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top