Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So he can be the next saviour that gets scapegoated by the club and fans if it doesn't work out? I'm sure he's licking his lipsLongmire. Get him.
So he can be the next saviour that gets scapegoated by the club and fans if it doesn't work out? I'm sure he's licking his lips
But Cripps loves him.I hate the cycle we are in with coaches this century but I think that may be it for him. And most importantly that has to be it for the assistant coaches. Tim Clark might just be the worst midfield coach in the AFL. I don't get how he is not seeing the issues with the current midfield set up.
All of the midfielders are just hunting the ball and getting sucked into the contest. If we win it we have no one on the outside to spread and get a clean kick i50 - instead it is a hurried kicked by the player winning the ball. And if we don't win opposition players are already on the outside and they are off and we can't put any delay on their ball movement as they are unmanned. The game plan itself is just too brutal and contested-focused that it is impossible to sustain it for four quarters. The scoreboard in first halves compared to second halves shows this clearly. And then you look and see we only used 63/75 rotations tonight - why?
Another thing that drives me up as wall is how we allow teams to just walk it to the wing so easily from kickouts. We genuinely just give up two easy kicks every time allowing them to get to the wing under limited pressure. On the other end our kickouts are just long and wide and we often turn it over.
I can't ask more from these players. The effort and intensity has been there the last two weeks. And they have looked like the better team in the first half of both games. But again, the way they are asked to play is not sustainable. We fall away and it's not because of lack of effort.
Well said.I hate the cycle we are in with coaches this century but I think that may be it for him. And most importantly that has to be it for the assistant coaches. Tim Clark might just be the worst midfield coach in the AFL. I don't get how he is not seeing the issues with the current midfield set up.
All of the midfielders are just hunting the ball and getting sucked into the contest. If we win it we have no one on the outside to spread and get a clean kick i50 - instead it is a hurried kicked by the player winning the ball. And if we don't win opposition players are already on the outside and they are off and we can't put any delay on their ball movement as they are unmanned. The game plan itself is just too brutal and contested-focused that it is impossible to sustain it for four quarters. The scoreboard in first halves compared to second halves shows this clearly. And then you look and see we only used 63/75 rotations tonight - why?
Another thing that drives me up as wall is how we allow teams to just walk it to the wing so easily from kickouts. We genuinely just give up two easy kicks every time allowing them to get to the wing under limited pressure. On the other end our kickouts are just long and wide and we often turn it over.
I can't ask more from these players. The effort and intensity has been there the last two weeks. And they have looked like the better team in the first half of both games. But again, the way they are asked to play is not sustainable. We fall away and it's not because of lack of effort.
Oh my God we do this all over the ground … why ? No wonder they’re buggered by half timeI hate the cycle we are in with coaches this century but I think that may be it for him. And most importantly that has to be it for the assistant coaches. Tim Clark might just be the worst midfield coach in the AFL. I don't get how he is not seeing the issues with the current midfield set up.
All of the midfielders are just hunting the ball and getting sucked into the contest. If we win it we have no one on the outside to spread and get a clean kick i50 - instead it is a hurried kicked by the player winning the ball. And if we don't win opposition players are already on the outside and they are off and we can't put any delay on their ball movement as they are unmanned. The game plan itself is just too brutal and contested-focused that it is impossible to sustain it for four quarters. The scoreboard in first halves compared to second halves shows this clearly. And then you look and see we only used 63/75 rotations tonight - why?
Another thing that drives me up as wall is how we allow teams to just walk it to the wing so easily from kickouts. We genuinely just give up two easy kicks every time allowing them to get to the wing under limited pressure. On the other end our kickouts are just long and wide and we often turn it over.
I can't ask more from these players. The effort and intensity has been there the last two weeks. And they have looked like the better team in the first half of both games. But again, the way they are asked to play is not sustainable. We fall away and it's not because of lack of effort.
You can get away with a head coach that is not the best tactically if you put a good team around him. I just don't think our assistants have shown enough tactical nous.Our coach said it in the press conference tonight.. 'I wish I had the answer to that' followed up with 'I'll have to check the numbers and stats'. Does that instill faith that Voss has this situation under control? It can't keep being about needing to be better around the contest (which he said again tonight) and taking our chances. You need to find ways to win even if you're kicking poorly. The good teams and good coaches find a way.
My comment wasn’t defending VossPossibly but if he can't get anything out of this list then no one can. Voss aint the answer. He never was and it was a ridiculous decision.
I didn't think it was mate i just despise the Voss selection.My comment wasn’t defending Voss
Agree or not, think there’s an inevitability about what will happen next.
The start to the season has been unacceptable on so many levels and there’s not an obvious short or long term fix.
Yea i'm not as keen on Simpson and horse did say he isn't closing the door on coaching its just that he needed a break. If the right offer comes along just maybe might entice him.I think horse is done.
Adam Simpson !!!
Agree or not, think there’s an inevitability about what will happen next.
The start to the season has been unacceptable on so many levels and there’s not an obvious short or long term fix.
"The numbers looked good tonight, just a few moments that let us down" - Michael Voss (March 28th, 2025).
I would gladly suffer another 3-5 years rebuilding if we had a fire sale, got some picks and young talent into the club, and threw a lot of money at TDK to keep him at the club and went out and got Adam Simpson to be our next coach.
EDIT: No I wouldn't actually - because we need to replace our recruiters first.
Hopefully we dont linger to long with Voss if it looks like we are out of finals contention. Could get games into some younger players but Voss wont do that if he is trying to hang onto his job. Also could miss the best senior/assistant candidates if we wait for an end of season review.Season has a 2014 vibe about it, but I would like to think/hope we are better off field than we were then and we don't have a maniac in Malthouse in charge destroying the club and no one around to stop the rot. Also the list is in better shape than then (though still not overly great).
I think most likely, if things go how I think they will on field this season (i anticipate maybe 7-8 wins) Lloyd will "resign" sometime mid season, Voss will probably linger on unless we begin getting flogged every week and/or there is some player mutiny. Then the "full football department review" which will either see a) Voss surviving by the skin of his teeth but a restructured football department or b) Voss gone and we go again with someone else.
Either way I think it wont be scorched earth on or off field, but a quiet admission the list isn't getting us anywhere we want to be in its current form and if Voss is kept on it will be the backing him for the long haul (like say till 2028/29) knowing we may have to go slightly backwards to go forwards, or if its a new coach, they wont be expected to take us immediately to top 4 and a flag contender in 2026.
I think most likely Voss gone end of this season, be like you tried, you failed, you got 4 years, we go again with another plan.
No, keep him there until the new ceo finds the right replacementBookmark me. You’ll hear it:
“Needed to be a little bit cleaner forward of centre”… “we won the inside 50s”… “we didn’t take our chances when we had them”
That is the rhetoric of a coach that has no answers for his system.
His team has given up leads of
41
16
24
In consecutive weeks.
“Didn’t take our chances”, “effort was there”…
Gotta go, bro.
Go horse or something. Have some actual vision and a strategic brain.
This is why i'm hopeful G. Wright will take over sooner rather than later.I think you guys are kind of missing the point. The problem is not Voss, the problem is the club as a whole. We have no idea how to pick a coach. We sack him, we will end up picking the wrong coach again. We do not understand the modern game as a club at all, we don't know what to look for in a coach.
After the pies won the flag, the was a very good article on why Collingwood picked MacRae. It was down to MacRae and Voss and when it was time to explain intended game plan they felt Voss was at a bit of a loss, where as they knew MacRae understood what needed to be done.
He took a team that was predicted to struggle for years, implement a modern game plan, won a flag, struggled last year and now seems up and running again with a very old team. That's game plan.
Absolutely.The biggest takeaway there is: 'Really confident in the manner we want to play'.
Voss is going to keep this game plan until they drag him out kicking and screaming.