Stat Observations

[RobZombie]

Unfortunately it's one of those things where revealing the trick would get it shut down

Shame. I know there are things out there that basically scrape afl tables and give you some tools for working with it but yes, you definitely seem to have some things in excess of that. A few years ago I had a poke around and found some json describing the game events on one of those animated play trackers.

 

[Samsquanch]

Unfortunately it's one of those things where revealing the trick would get it shut down

There you go. We've been tracking him for some time now, especially when he uses the Tasmanian POIs which haven't had the recent security patches installed.

 

[Engimal v3]

*% represents the % of the team's total score the player contributed to.

 

[Engimal v3]

Kicks into Forward 50 and their result (NMFC vs GWS, R1).

It seems that we weren't able to penetrate the half forward line as well and weren't able to get the ball as deep.

 

[Lomas]

Xerri is by far the worst surname I've ever come across in all my time following the AFL.

It looks like a s**t hand that one would get whilst playing scrabble.

X-E-R-R-I : How am I suppose to spell anything with this combination?

Rixer : someone who quarrels or brawls.

 

[ferball]

Kicks into Forward 50 and their result (NMFC vs GWS, R1).

It seems that we weren't able to penetrate the half forward line as well and weren't able to get the ball as deep.

View attachment 1930739

Great plot.

It illustrates the issues with our long entries into f50 i think. But how much pressure were we under in the middle because imo those long entries are as much a function of pressure as anything else.

 

[BigRedRoo]

We kicked the ball 205 times, the difference between first and almost last for ball retention is 6% or approximately 12 kicks a game.
That's 3 kicks a quarter. Amazing the difference by correcting 3 kicks a quarter could make to our overall game result.

 

[Dan]

Rixer : someone who quarrels or brawls.

Nerd

 

[Engimal v3]

A very early prototype of something I'm working on...


Hopefully something exciting to share in the coming weeks

 

[Engimal v3]

Inside 50 kicks/marks that resulted in goals from North Melbourne vs Brisbane (R4)

(normalised kicking-ends)

 

[Engimal v3]

Goal sources


9/16 (56%) of Brisbane's goals came from Possession Gains (turnovers from North).

North didn't manage to score a goal from a Brisbane turnover even once. A bit of an indictment on our pressure forwards, would love to hear any theories as to why from those who caught more of the game.

 

[Engimal v3]

 

[Engimal v3]

 

[My Left Foote]

Rixer : someone who quarrels or brawls.

I suggested some alternatives to Nostra's 2024 draft strategy but he's such a rixer he wouldn't even consider it.

 

[ChopChopDigDig]

Would love your data source Engimal if you could share on DM?

Anyway, I was wondering how far ahead on the 50m penalty ladder we are, and found the data on the Fox footy site. No surprises here.

ADE - 5
BRI - 3
CAR - 2
COL - 2
ESS - 3
FRE - 6
GEE - 3
GCS - 3
GWS - 5
HAW - 4
MEL - 3
NTH - 10
POR - 3
RIC - 8
STK - 0
SYD - 4
WCE - 5
WBD - 3

 

[Engimal v3]

 

[big_e]

Goal sources
View attachment 1951186

9/16 (56%) of Brisbane's goals came from Possession Gains (turnovers from North).

North didn't manage to score a goal from a Brisbane turnover even once. A bit of an indictment on our pressure forwards, would love to hear any theories as to why from those who caught more of the game.

Love all of these, by the way. Some really interesting stuff.

Question on this one: what were the turnovers? Were they free kicks against, ball spills out in a tackle, intercepted kick, etc, etc?

 

[Engimal v3]

 

[ohmygewd]

Rucks over 3 matches or more thus far:

 

[Devington]

Rucks over 3 matches or more thus far:
View attachment 1954810

All looks about right. Hit outs to advantage not nearly high enough, pressure acts and clearances sky high, and a pretty shizen score involvement percentage because the clearances we get aren't too clean (just like our forward entries).

 

[Engimal v3]

Love all of these, by the way. Some really interesting stuff.

Question on this one: what were the turnovers? Were they free kicks against, ball spills out in a tackle, intercepted kick, etc, etc?

Sorry, didn't see this. Unfortunately I got stoned as in my garage after making this and didn't save it. I'll look into it though!

 

[The acurate one]

Here's an observation.

We on average are allowing the opposition to have 32 scoring shots per match. 8 per quarter.
We average 14 scoring shots per game or if your prefer 3.5 per quarter
The 'against' average per match is currently 122. Or 18.14 122.
We average a "stern look" 10.9 69
If you deep dive into that it actually means our back line is ****ed, our mid field is ****ed and our Fwd line is ****ed.

Going by that, beating anyone would be amazing.

Oh well

 

[rickety]

Here's an observation.

We on average are allowing the opposition to have 32 scoring shots per match. 8 per quarter.
We average 14 scoring shots per game or if your prefer 3.5 per quarter
The 'against' average per match is currently 122. Or 18.14 122.
We average a "stern look" 10.9 69
If you deep dive into that it actually means our back line is ****ed, our mid field is ****ed and our Fwd line is ****ed.

Going by that, beating anyone would be amazing.

Oh well

When I read that I heard Lou Richards reading the scores

 

[big_e]

Here's an observation.

We on average are allowing the opposition to have 32 scoring shots per match. 8 per quarter.
We average 14 scoring shots per game or if your prefer 3.5 per quarter
The 'against' average per match is currently 122. Or 18.14 122.
We average a "stern look" 10.9 69
If you deep dive into that it actually means our back line is ****ed, our mid field is ****ed and our Fwd line is ****ed.

Going by that, beating anyone would be amazing.

Oh well

We're crap and our opponents are good.

That's exactly the type of meaningless hot take you've become known for, TAO. Great stuff.

 

[Amicalola]

This thread is awesome, even if the logical conclusions are a bit deflating.