Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
Members barInterested to see peoples thoughts.
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
Realised after id posted it and tapa wouldnt allow me to delete it.Members bar
I've done the same. Created a thread on our board meant for the main board. Embarassing but Scully2Folau fixed it.Realised after id posted it and tapa wouldnt allow me to delete it.
Sorry Determinant
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
Trains- hmmm. Government said they had learnt from Kingsford Smith, and then announced no rail to be built till after the airport is built. Doh!
I hope so.Sounds like there's a fair chance funding for it comes out of the infrastructure funding announced in the budget, which will be great.
There is that. The money spent digging tunnels around the Strathfield junction so Coal trains from the Hunter can get to ships in Botany easily must have hurt someone. Still not sure if that was ultinately public moneyDon't think we'd have the necessary infrastructure to support the airport i.e. train lines and/or bus lines. But I do think it's a good idea if we can get on top of that.
Rather the money go towards that than giving out loans to overseas multinationals to build a coal mine rail link that has significantly less public benefit
That ia my next question. I still cant find any confirmation on where the runway will face.Huge positive for Sydney and Greater Western Sydney as a whole.
Massive uplift in employment, during building and operation.
Hard to find a negative unless you live directly under the takeoff landing zone or where they want to build it.
So im guessing you live in Badgerys Creek Ichabod ?Dont get me started.
I've read the initial site selection report (1985) - that's 32 years ago when they were selecting a site for an airport one tenth the size of the proposed airport, the original EIS from 2000 (which advocated the airport but contained enough to say no) and the SMEC Auditors Report on the EIS (which said the EIS was pretty deficient in a lot of areas)
This will not work on an environmental level, on a social level or an economic level. It will create more problems than it solves - and it WILL NOT SOLVE the noice problem at KSA.
How do people feel about hundreds of extra fuel tankers on the M4 every week? (because there's no fuel depot or pipeline in WS, they have to truck it in daily) with an estimated 8-10 accidents each year predicted (they say "minor", no fatalities, but there's nothing minor about an accident involving a tanker crammed with AVGAS)
What happens to aircraft movements if a westerly blows in?
Ha ha. Trick question- nobody knows. They never modeled it.
Second airports don't work anywhere in the world like they are proposing here. They just don't.
I could go on, and on, and on, with everything that's wrong with is this ridiculous idea, but I won't, I'll just say....
STUPID IDEA, STUPID IDEA, STUPID, STUPID, STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!
So thats a no?Dont get me started.
I've read the initial site selection report (1985) - that's 32 years ago when they were selecting a site for an airport one tenth the size of the proposed airport, the original EIS from 2000 (which advocated the airport but contained enough to say no) and the SMEC Auditors Report on the EIS (which said the EIS was pretty deficient in a lot of areas)
This will not work on an environmental level, on a social level or an economic level. It will create more problems than it solves - and it WILL NOT SOLVE the noice problem at KSA.
How do people feel about hundreds of extra fuel tankers on the M4 every week? (because there's no fuel depot or pipeline in WS, they have to truck it in daily) with an estimated 8-10 accidents each year predicted (they say "minor", no fatalities, but there's nothing minor about an accident involving a tanker crammed with AVGAS)
What happens to aircraft movements if a westerly blows in?
Ha ha. Trick question- nobody knows. They never modeled it.
Second airports don't work anywhere in the world like they are proposing here. They just don't.
I could go on, and on, and on, with everything that's wrong with is this ridiculous idea, but I won't, I'll just say....
STUPID IDEA, STUPID IDEA, STUPID, STUPID, STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!
That ia my next question. I still cant find any confirmation on where the runway will face.
Really hope we dont have A380,s low flying over Camden.
Thats my only issue
On HUAWEI NXT-L09 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Dont discount this state government.Pretty sure it'll be horizontal.
I'm thinking an aircraft carrier permanently moored in Botany Bay never really received the attention it should haveDont discount this state government.
Vertical may be a new fangled way to get the greens on board.
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
That ia my next question. I still cant find any confirmation on where the runway will face.
Really hope we dont have A380,s low flying over Camden.
Thats my only issue
On HUAWEI NXT-L09 using BigFooty.com mobile app