m
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The Bradbury's are at it again..
- Thread starter AFaiL
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Banned
- #52
Hmm, ok...
In case you didn't pick up on what I was saying, I think Saints are making a huge mistake by giving you this chance.
I would easily back you in a final over them, any day of the week.
And if we were up against you, I would back that it's gonna be a close contest, probably no more than 2 goals in it.
I'd pick us because we've beaten you twice (as I said), but it would be in no way a forgone conclusion. Whereas I think it would be if you were playing the Saints.
I'm not quite sure how you got offended out of all that, but well done to you princess.
TC
P.S. When, in a previous post, I said we have you covered, I'm talking in respect to the track record Saints will be going into the finals against you with. As I said, I think it would be a close game between us, but I would back us.
Where does it say I was ever offended at any stage? I don't have to get offended before I can call someone a Goonflog over the cyberweb do I? Coz if I do, who made that rule? It's shit as...
Anyway Goonflog, I'd just like to assure you that "offence" is on the wholly opposite end of the emotional spectrum from the ones illicited by your attempt at formulating a logical way to pay out on both your rivals for diametrically opposing reasons, brazenly adopting the role one played against you in your argument with the other...
funny stuff
Anyway Goonflog, I'd just like to assure you that "offence" is on the wholly opposite end of the emotional spectrum from the ones illicited by your attempt at formulating a logical way to pay out on both your rivals for diametrically opposing reasons, brazenly adopting the role one played against you in your argument with the other...
funny stuff
m
aussieicon91
All Australian
Quality comeback.
I haven't really been following, HP, but is this the stupidest thing you've ever said? Doesn't a team of players playing well constitute a very good team? Are you truly an nfi sniper making up for a lack of anything worthwhile to say by saying it often?
Anyway - agree with OP. "Resting" uninjured, in-form players constitutes tanking... Allowing the Bradburys to Bradbury their way into an undeserved finals berth should be punished with extreme prejudice.
AFaiL
Club Legend
- Apr 27, 2009
- 2,833
- 85
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Thread starter
- #57
How'd you go tonight, d1ckh3ad?Hmm, ok...
In case you didn't pick up on what I was saying, I think Saints are making a huge mistake by giving you this chance.
I would easily back you in a final over them, any day of the week.
And if we were up against you, I would back that it's gonna be a close contest, probably no more than 2 goals in it.
I'd pick us because we've beaten you twice (as I said), but it would be in no way a forgone conclusion. Whereas I think it would be if you were playing the Saints.
I'm not quite sure how you got offended out of all that, but well done to you princess.
TC
P.S. When, in a previous post, I said we have you covered, I'm talking in respect to the track record Saints will be going into the finals against you with. As I said, I think it would be a close game between us, but I would back us.
Learn to read between the lines Lazarus.
Why, if you were the douchebag himself, would you go on such a rant if you weren't making accusations. If you weren't insinuating anything, then why bother giving such a vitriolic response?
Just say: "I can't speak for what the club is doing with their management" and move on.
He's either a douchebag hipocrite, or a moron in the face of the media.
Or both.
TC
Most likely because he was asked a question to that effect. The journos in pressers always ask dumb questions. Given, he could have been more dismissive - but he is hardly a hypocrite.
LOL @ the Bradbury's ...
They are being embarrassed by Sandringham !!!
They are being embarrassed by Sandringham !!!
