- Sep 23, 2012
- 1,979
- 1,396
- AFL Club
- GWS
Sorry, I didn't quite catch what you said there... could you repeat it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Collingwood v Melbourne - 3:20PM Mon
Squiggle tips Pies at 52% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
So was boyd. Yet the doggies(god love em) knew how to trade and knew what they wanted.I understand that the club didn't get to offer anything as your club wouldn't trade anything as he was a required player. Media and ill informed people were saying all sorts of crap.
If someone wont come to the table you cant lodge your offer as there are 2 parties involved in any negotiation and the circumstances of each trade are are different so there is no point in referring to the Boyd trade. Not getting McCarthy isn't Freo's fault as you like to suggest as your lot didn't want to talk. For me I don't care if we get him or not as I am not one that believes that to get to the Grand Final this year that we needed McCarthy.So was boyd. Yet the doggies(god love em) knew how to trade and knew what they wanted.
This is all on freo and that scum sucking manager. Cam as well.
If someone wont come to the table you cant lodge your offer as there are 2 parties involved in any negotiation and the circumstances of each trade are are different so there is no point in referring to the Boyd trade. Not getting McCarthy isn't Freo's fault as you like to suggest as your lot didn't want to talk. For me I don't care if we get him or not as I am not one that believes that to get to the Grand Final this year that we needed McCarthy.
Let's not waste any more time on the s**tstain supporters from that purple franchise
Danny, you're a pretty reasonable poster on the Freo and main boards, so happy to discuss this aspect. What you say is certainly true as a first-order cause-effect, which I think all GWS fans do understand. We also understand that there are elements of the Boyd trade that are quite different. (Such as it was actually Griffen who first asked to be traded out, requiring GWS to come up with trade currency. But then Boyd threw himself up for a trade, which was not to GWS's benefit, which reversed that situation to become more parallel to the current McCarthy situation.) However, the point that we GWS supporters (and General Giant in particular repeatedly) make in the reference to the Boyd situation is that in both cases GWS management stated that they 'would not trade their player under any circumstances'. And yet, the Bulldogs came up with an offer that 'knocked our socks off' and caused GWS management to reverse their position and do a trade. There are enough unaligned supporters who see this comparison.
The point has been often made that the 'spectacular offer' would need to be someone like Lachie Neale plus another high draft pick. Yes, we get that such an offer would need Neale to be willing and it's not likely that he was/would be. That just emphasises the 'spectacular' nature of offer required, and therefore unlikelihood of success. So we accept that there was an extremely low probability of the trade coming off. And GWS (both the club and supporters) I think are entirely comfortable with the outcome, because GWS never wanted to lose McCarthy, and back themselves to change his mind. And if GWS can't, and he leaves in two (or even one) years so be it. I would not expect to get as much in trade currency in two years as would/should have been on offer in the 2015 draft period, as part of the 2015 offer would have needed to be a premium to spring McCarthy 2 years early from his contract. It's not 'stupid' as some posters want to declare. It's just a 'risk', and one that GWS is actually reasonably well-placed to take given its list size and existing KPF situation.
I agree with most of what you have said except that wanting Neale plus a draft pick would IMO never have got anywhere and I think you have acknowledged that. Lachie Neale is clearly a better player than Mccarthy and that would have been over what Cam was worth and the Dockers wouldn't ever come to the party for a trade involving Lachie at this point in his career. Neale was a member of the AA squad and in top 22 of the U/22's this year so he is a recognised talent and spoken highly of by good judges like Dermot Brereton and Gerard Healey etc and Cam is not yet at that level of his development.
I am an advocate for building our forward line for post Pav days from what we have already got. So if I was Ross I wouldn't be bothered waiting on McCarthy but would rely on a good development program to deliver up as a KPF either Taberner or Apeness or Alex Pearce or even our International rookie (Hurley) with more games under their belt in 2016. Have a great Xmas.
I note you are now Suspended. What were you suspended for ?To be fair i havent seen anywhere that Danny has had a go at our club so thats ok.
I note you are now Suspended. What were you suspended for ?
I used to be a negatitive nancy.I note you are now Suspended. What were you suspended for ?
Now now Andre.Only a Dockers fan could expect a suspended poster to answer why they were suspended...
FFS
I vote youMight be time for a new thread.
OP to include all OOC players with live updates as that quickly changes
OP to include detailed bios on all standout academy prospects
OP to include all current draft selections we hold so nuffies understand how we got them and tha they weren't more handouts/concessions
OP to include therapeutic message for those of us who venture into the saint kilda rumor thread and/or the Fremantle obsession thread
So who wants to be OP
Seconded.I vote you
Good luck.
Are you ok mate, your acting like you've been brainwashed by a cultSeconded.
Im sure you will have a positive outlook
Not at all.Are you ok mate, your acting like you've been brainwashed by a cult