The Cricket Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

While watching Starc just fall shy of his ton, that he even got close spelt doom for our makeshift bowling attack come their turn.

What a slaughter.
 
They'll make 800 on this, and we'll be rolled in the second innings for under 200 in 2 sessions

has to be the worst bowling attack we've fielded for many, many years. hard to see them taking 10 wickets, let alone 20.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

has to be the worst bowling attack we've fielded for many, many years. hard to see them taking 10 wickets, let alone 20.

Strong chance chance 3 of them are going to be leading our Ashes attack. Starc, Siddle and Lyon are going to be probables more than possibles in the first test in England.
 
Strong chance chance 3 of them are going to be leading our Ashes attack. Starc, Siddle and Lyon are going to be probables more than possibles in the first test in England.

Yeah, I know. But in context to playing in India. They just look so ineffectual. Getting their arses kicked like a bunch of old rented mules.
 
Strong chance chance 3 of them are going to be leading our Ashes attack. Starc, Siddle and Lyon are going to be probables more than possibles in the first test in England.
Add Bird and Pattinson and all of a sudden we have a decent attack for English conditions. I'm more concerned with our batting. Distinctly second rate at the moment
 
Add Bird and Pattinson and all of a sudden we have a decent attack for English conditions. I'm more concerned with our batting. Distinctly second rate at the moment

Yes. And with no disrespect to Steve Smith, who did play well - and, it must said as AH has been saying all along he's a good player of spin - but if he looks a cut above and he's our number 5 we have huge problems.
 
Patto missing has certainly taking away our absolute quality. Ideally, I'd like him and Bird in for the Ashes.

Cummins is the one I'd like back in the test side. He's potentially our once in a generation player.
 
Yes. And with no disrespect to Steve Smith, who did play well - and, it must said as AH has been saying all along he's a good player of spin - but if he looks a cut above and he's our number 5 we have huge problems.
Totally agree. I was a little surprised with Smith, but AH had him nailed. Although as you said, Stark cruising to 99 put it all into context.
Surly this Siddle at 8 thing has to end now. He's a capable night watchman and nothing more.
 
Cummins is the one I'd like back in the test side. He's potentially our once in a generation player.

Maybe, but lets let him have a season of Shield cricket under his belt first to see ifhis body can stand the rigours of 4 day cricket, let alone 5 days. I agree, he seems a gun in waiting, but just can;t stay fit. Needs a full season for NSW (but banned from T20) first for mine.
 
Totally agree. I was a little surprised with Smith, but AH had him nailed. Although as you said, Stark cruising to 99 put it all into context.
Surly this Siddle at 8 thing has to end now. He's a capable night watchman and nothing more.

Honestly, I think the Tasmanian Shield side has a stronger batting line up.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The Cricket Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top