Current Trial The Delphi Teen Murders - Video of killer found in Libby's phone * TRIAL

Remove this Banner Ad

Andrea Burkhart is just a shill for the defense. Besides backing the 'Odinist's did it' without a shred of evidence, she claimed there wasn't enough blood where the girls bodies were found to have been killed there, despite several large pools (probably a couple of litres in each). She claims the earth isn't porous LOL. She was formerly a defense attorney so not really surprising she is trying to influence her followers of the defense stance that the girls were driven off somewhere by those Odinists and then their bodies brought back at 4am (when the area was teaming with searchers). This stance is just so ridiculous you could almost believe his attorneys are making a play for an appeal for ineffective council. Andrea is adamant Bryan Kohberger is innocent if that gives you an idea. Tom Webster and Lauren Mathias are also in court each day and take copious notes. Both just read their notes from the trial each day with little opinion.

Anyway, there is no doubt RA is guilty. The slam dunk was last night when his prison psychologist testified regarding the many confessions he made to her. One was 'I followed the girls when they crossed the bridge and ordered them down the hill because I intended to rape them, but was interrupted when a white van drove by. I panicked and forced them across the creek where I slashed their throats, making sure they were dead so they didn't suffer. Then I went on with my life" (paraphrased)

The above was exactly the premise of the prosecution - he intended to rape the girls but was interrupted which forced him to take the girls across the creek. After the psychologist, they put the guy with the white van on the stand to confirm the timeline of him returning from work on his (parents) driveway which went under the bridge. The data from Libby's iPhone showing movement, elevation changes, no movement etc. was completely in line with the prosecution theory and RA's own account.

RA's confessions had information only the killer would know. Besides the white van, he claimed to have used a box cutter to slash the girl's throats. The Medical Examiner hadn't indicated a box cutter was used in his report, but on the stand said he later reflected a box cutter could account for the serrations in the girls wounds.

His 'psychosis' while in prison was turned on and off when convenient. He steeled himself with a deep breathe when he would eat his excrement and after doing something to his genitals with a spork, told the guard he wouldn't be doing that again! He even claimed 'what do I have to do to make you believe I'm insane!' - Probably do a little research into psychosis rather than copy what you've seen in the movies.

Overnight the court will hear his recorded confessions he made to his wife and mother. We might also get a look at his search history which of course the defense are trying to exclude.

Thank goodness the jury is sequestered and only has the evidence in court to make their decision. I've only seen utter garbage and lies on twitter and from a number of creators.
 
Andrea Burkhart is just a shill for the defense. Besides backing the 'Odinist's did it' without a shred of evidence, she claimed there wasn't enough blood where the girls bodies were found to have been killed there, despite several large pools (probably a couple of litres in each). She claims the earth isn't porous LOL. She was formerly a defense attorney so not really surprising she is trying to influence her followers of the defense stance that the girls were driven off somewhere by those Odinists and then their bodies brought back at 4am (when the area was teaming with searchers). This stance is just so ridiculous you could almost believe his attorneys are making a play for an appeal for ineffective council. Andrea is adamant Bryan Kohberger is innocent if that gives you an idea. Tom Webster and Lauren Mathias are also in court each day and take copious notes. Both just read their notes from the trial each day with little opinion.

Anyway, there is no doubt RA is guilty. The slam dunk was last night when his prison psychologist testified regarding the many confessions he made to her. One was 'I followed the girls when they crossed the bridge and ordered them down the hill because I intended to rape them, but was interrupted when a white van drove by. I panicked and forced them across the creek where I slashed their throats, making sure they were dead so they didn't suffer. Then I went on with my life" (paraphrased)

The above was exactly the premise of the prosecution - he intended to rape the girls but was interrupted which forced him to take the girls across the creek. After the psychologist, they put the guy with the white van on the stand to confirm the timeline of him returning from work on his (parents) driveway which went under the bridge. The data from Libby's iPhone showing movement, elevation changes, no movement etc. was completely in line with the prosecution theory and RA's own account.

RA's confessions had information only the killer would know. Besides the white van, he claimed to have used a box cutter to slash the girl's throats. The Medical Examiner hadn't indicated a box cutter was used in his report, but on the stand said he later reflected a box cutter could account for the serrations in the girls wounds.

His 'psychosis' while in prison was turned on and off when convenient. He steeled himself with a deep breathe when he would eat his excrement and after doing something to his genitals with a spork, told the guard he wouldn't be doing that again! He even claimed 'what do I have to do to make you believe I'm insane!' - Probably do a little research into psychosis rather than copy what you've seen in the movies.

Overnight the court will hear his recorded confessions he made to his wife and mother. We might also get a look at his search history which of course the defense are trying to exclude.

Thank goodness the jury is sequestered and only has the evidence in court to make their decision. I've only seen utter garbage and lies on twitter and from a number of creators.

Andrea isn't adamant of anything - she just doesn't see there's enough evidence for beyond reasonable doubt. In this case and Kohberger.

I haven't heard her say she backs the Odinist theory - she has said however that the state can push their theory and the defense should be able to do the same.

She is still a practicing defense attorney but mainly at appelate level.

The prison psych's testimony was a hot mess. She was following the case early on and participated in chat rooms about it. She has since been fired.

She was not credible.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Remove this Banner Ad

Current Trial The Delphi Teen Murders - Video of killer found in Libby's phone * TRIAL

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top