Kynge of Begrem
Norm Smith Medallist
- Thread starter
- #26
Much better week only spoiled by Geelong covering the line
-37.65u
-37.65u
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I was worried you were going to run out of weeks but it now seems a fait accompli. Well done on the week.Much better week only spoiled by Geelong covering the line
-37.65u
Have you seen my index? I know I haven't reached the dizzying lows that you achieved, albeit without even trying, but I WILL beat your -87 per cent.You will not lose your money significantly beyond what a coin flip would do for you, as that would require real edge.
Have you seen my index? I know I haven't reached the dizzying lows that you achieved, albeit without even trying, but I WILL beat your -87 per cent.
And you claim to be a statistical geniusAnyone would flipping enough coins over time
And you claim to be a statistical genius
And you claim to be a statistical genius
Given that you did significantly worse ie you lost 87 per cent of your money, what does that say about this 'edge' you speak of?I don't think you fully comprehend what I'm saying.
Keep a win % logged here, you'll find you wont do significantly worse than 50% ATS.
Given that you did significantly worse ie you lost 87 per cent of your money, what does that say about this 'edge' you speak of?
You don't understand what 'significantly worse' means in a statistical context. Losing 87% is not (statistically) significantly worse than a 50% ATS record.
As to my current edge, i'm 56% for 411 plays this season, and all released to the public. Depending on whether I move from my current tout mob or not (pending a new deal), I'll let you know where you could find them.
Have you run into any problems with limitations at certain books yet?
You don't understand what 'significantly worse' means in a statistical context. Losing 87% is not (statistically) significantly worse than a 50% ATS record.
As to my current edge, i'm 56% for 411 plays this season, and all released to the public. Depending on whether I move from my current tout mob or not (pending a new deal), I'll let you know where you could find them.
My current edge is 59% over 1,271 plays, if you want any help feel free to inbox me
What sports?
Predominantly Tennis, AFL, NRL, NFL
Predominantly Tennis, AFL, NRL, NFL
Geez mate, 59% ATS over 1200 plays in those liquid markets would take a $10K roll and turn it into single digit millions even at 1/3 Kelly! I have no doubt we'll be hearing more about your betting exploits in the media sooner rather than later. And this is even with you mixing up the differing concepts of edge and ATS win %!
Screw this, I don't want to follow Billy W's 57% ATS lifetime or Dr Bob's 55% lifetime, Burdgundy's the new ATS king on the block!
Geez mate, 59% ATS over 1200 plays in those liquid markets would take a $10K roll and turn it into single digit millions even at 1/3 Kelly! I have no doubt we'll be hearing more about your betting exploits in the media sooner rather than later. And this is even with you mixing up the differing concepts of edge and ATS win %!
Screw this, I don't want to follow Billy W's 57% ATS lifetime or Dr Bob's 55% lifetime, Burdgundy's the new ATS king on the block!