Conspiracy Theory The Moon Landings were REAL okay?

[Exe Gesis]

I found it nigh impossible picking up analog tv signals from wollongong to sydney, and they managed to get crystal clear analog tv signals from 40m miles away from outer space. Neat.

 

[M Malice]

I can't come at this one, why if it was faked would they continue to push their luck and the chance of being "caught out"? There were 5 more missions.

https://www.sciencefocus.com/space/...rst-on-the-moon-who-filmed-him-on-the-ladder/


Rest assured, NASA didn’t call on Moon-dwellers to perform camera duties. They simply mounted a camera on the Descent Stage of the Lunar Module and pointed it at the steps.

 

[Procrastinator35]

I found it nigh impossible picking up analog tv signals from Wollongong to sydney, and they managed to get crystal clear analog tv signals from 40m miles away from outer space. Neat.

Next time I go to the moon, I best remember the telly remote....Nothing worse than having to get up to change the frequency.

How anyone can take that moon module seriously is beyond the pale.

 

[Present Not Past]

Here's but one photo from the brilliant Moon Landing.
Wonderful stuff.

 

[Present Not Past]

Got that sucker through the Van Allen Belts

 

[Present Not Past]

 

[Procrastinator35]

Got that sucker through the Van Allen Belts

View attachment 890245

Doubt it....He'd be fried to a crisp internally, within minutes.

 

[Present Not Past]

Doubt it....He'd be fried to a crisp internally, within minutes.

Well he looks perfectly healthy to me.
Maybe you've got the Van Allen Belts mixed up with some other phenomenon in the Universe.

 

[Procrastinator35]

Well he looks perfectly healthy to me.
Maybe you've got the Van Allen Belts mixed up with some other phenomenon in the Universe.

Look...It's A good piccy n All, but they're not beyond them, if he's still live.

 

[Quokka]

I found it nigh impossible picking up analog tv signals from wollongong to sydney, and they managed to get crystal clear analog tv signals from 40m miles away from outer space. Neat.

Did your aerial look like this?

 

[Registered User]

Capricorn One is on SBS Viceland tonight

 

[Present Not Past]

Capricorn One is about a landing on Mars

 

[Present Not Past]

I have undeniable evidence.

This module flew all the way to the moon, and supported human life on the moon for the day or so that the astronauts spent there. This photo is from the moon's surface, as you can plainly see.

Do you honestly think tv and government would lie to you? But they LOVE you

Doofus. This craft was only used to make the landing on the Moon and get them off.
It wasn't used to transport the astronauts all the way from Earth.

 

[Procrastinator35]

Doofus. This craft was only used to make the landing on the Moon and get them off.
It wasn't used to transport the astronauts all the way from Earth.

Looks like it's made out of cardboard tubes, aluminum panels, some shiny copper & gold imitation paper-mache & held together by sticky to me.

Piss-take if ever there was one.

 

[Present Not Past]

Looks like it's made out of cardboard tubes, aluminum panels, some shiny copper & gold imitation paper-mache & held together by sticky to me.

Piss-take if ever there was one.

I'll take your informed observation on board.
Nah, just kidding.

 

[Procrastinator35]

I'll take your informed observation on board.Nah, just kidding.

Seriously.....Just use the evidence of your own senses for once....Strip that picture of all context & take a bloody good look at that thing.

It belongs in a kindergarten play-room, cause it wouldn't survive a strong breeze.

 

[Wallaby]

Seriously.....Just use the evidence of your own senses for once....Strip that picture of all context & take a bloody good look at that thing.

It belongs in a kindergarten play-room, cause it wouldn't survive a strong breeze.

Just as well there aren't any strong breezes on the moon then.

 

[Present Not Past]

Seriously.....Just use the evidence of your own senses for once....Strip that picture of all context & take a bloody good look at that thing.

It belongs in a kindergarten play-room, cause it wouldn't survive a strong breeze.

All your comment demonstrates is that you know nothing about this subject area.

 

[Procrastinator35]

Just as well there aren't any strong breezes on the moon then.

Nor would it survive a take-off & landing either.....Seriously, you blokes are easily fooled by paper-mache.

Narrative given precedence over the evidence of your own senses....Well hood-winked & brain-washed the pair of you.

 

[Present Not Past]

Nor would it survive a take-off & landing either.....Seriously, you blokes are easily fooled by paper-mache.

Narrative given precedence over the evidence of your own senses....Well hood-winked & brain-washed the pair of you.

Your ignorance of the subject is glaringly obvious.

 

[Quokka]

Nor would it survive a take-off & landing either.....Seriously, you blokes are easily fooled by paper-mache.

Narrative given precedence over the evidence of your own senses....Well hood-winked & brain-washed the pair of you.

With no atmosphere to create friction the strong breeze would likely be more damaging than taking off and landing under ~1/6 Earth's gravity. The bottom half didn't even need to be designed to survive the thrust of taking off, only the upper section of the module left the moon.

That thing is a long way from paper mache and there is a strong internal skeleton under all that reflective material, don't get me wrong some sections were very thin aluminum sheeting but that's all they needed to be.

Still you seem to be a bit off on your assumptions of the forces involved. A silly example but imagine trying to catch an adult person weighing 80kg who has just fallen off a five story building.

You'd be very lucky to survive without major injury yourself and the person who fell almost certainly wouldn't.

Now imagine attempting the same thing with an adult person that weighs ~13.3kg?

Not something you would want to try but there is every chance that both of you would sustain significantly less injuries.

 

[Present Not Past]

Doubt it....He'd be fried to a crisp internally, within minutes.

Well you are smarter than all those fancy-pants science folk at NASA.
I mean why bother studying engineering and astronomy for 8 years at University when all you really have to do is spend 15 mins browsing "Natural News" for the answers?

 

[Werewolf]

Nor would it survive a take-off & landing either.....Seriously, you blokes are easily fooled by paper-mache.

Narrative given precedence over the evidence of your own senses....Well hood-winked & brain-washed the pair of you.

It could only fly in space and had to land on and take off from the moon, so it had completely different design parameters to every other machine designed by Grumman Aerospace. They had been making planes since the 1930's; the F-14 Tomcat is possibly their most well known creation:

 

[Procrastinator35]

Got a chuckle out of this one.

 

[ThunkaHunka]

Doofus. This craft was only used to make the landing on the Moon and get them off.
It wasn't used to transport the astronauts all the way from Earth.

'only used to make the landing on the moon and get them off'.
you make it sound as easy as bouncing a ball off the wall and catching it.
It purportedly remotely disengaged from its mother ship, powered its way
seamlessly and smoothly to the surface of a foreign planet, landed perfectly
on the first try, and then powered its way back to rendezvous with the orbiting mother
ship, coupling effortlessly and perfectly with said mother ship, and carrying its occupants
safely back to the home planet. All while looking like a bad elementary school 'craft' made
in the arts and crafts class.