Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Source on this? My understanding has always been that it’s a bent knee impact injury primarily. I know hyperextension can cause it, as well as twisting - but that’s more likely to cause the dreaded ACL, see Judd’s below:I don't think there is a problem.
There is a bigger issue of players being tackled from behind and sustaining a syndesmosis injury - we aren't looking at changing the rules because a very important Victorian player was injured.
I don't think anyone realizes that the PCL is just as vulnerable in a straight leg jump landing as it is with a shin collision. And what do we think would happen if they jump chest to chest, will we will see rucks landing with a straight leg after being off balance in the contact? Then we will see PCL injuries.
Welcome to the nature of contact sport.
Its an example on how to mitigate pcl injuries from AFL centre bounce ruck contests.
Basically taking out knees up in ruck contests just like they took out studs up in marking contests.
You would still get a contest in our game as opposed to the other suggestion of one side just being gifted free possession in the middle after every goal. The centre bounce becomes a wrestling ruck contest, not running at each other with knees up.
Im pretty bloody certain It wouldnt be ceremonial in our game now would it? Especially when it happens to start quarters and after every goal.
What would you prefer if something was changed?
Source on this? My understanding has always been that it’s a bent knee impact injury primarily. I know hyperextension can cause it, as well as twisting - but that’s more likely to cause the dreaded ACL, see Judd’s below:
Or Tex Walker:
Versus Jack Riewoldt, with a PCL occurring from bent knee contact:
Or Wells with his PCL, from bent knee contact to the turf as well:
You said it wasn't 'fair' if they share possessions back and forth. When it kinda literally is fair.
I don't really care if they remove the bounce and just throw it up, it indirectly benefits the quality of umpires by removing a skill barrier for entry that has nothing to do with adjudication of the rules, which is what the umpires are actually there to do.
There's really only one logical and simple solution, but the purists won't like it.
Get rid of the bounce and get rid of the run up. That's it.
Ball gets thrown up at every ruck contest and the rucks start closer together and come off only 1-2 steps.
As for those knee pads that some have posted...fck no! Us rucks (the good ones) have pride. We understand the risks. We know it's a physical position. We are taught how to jump into, how to position oneself, how to angle ourselves etc... Failure to do so can lead to injury. So be it.
I’d like your source on these claims as this just seems to be the subject of your interpretation of PCL injuries and associated consequences rather than an understanding of the mechanism of injury.You're right, allow me to fill in a scary added blank. Most PCL injuries come with another ligament injury, half of these are ACLs.
So do we want to increase the risk of a 12 month injury with straight leg jumps or do we want to wear the reality that some players might get a 12 week injury?
I’d like your source on these claims as this just seems to be the subject of your interpretation of PCL injuries and associated consequences rather than an understanding of the mechanism of injury.
Quick google suggests it’s pretty rare to happen simultaneously.
View attachment 1385850
I’m not sure a rule change for straight leg jumping is required but perhaps at the very least protecting the knees with gel padding as proposed by multiple posters is necessary.
So you admit it's a coincidence?Yes but in previous years there hasn't been many Injuries to those rucks. Last year 2 went down with ACL (Witts, Naismith) with a dozen short term injures. This year has a whole host of Long term injuries.
You’re reading it backwardsIsolated posterior cruciate ligament tears: an update of management - PMC
Isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears are much less frequent than anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Abrupt posterior tibial translation (such as dashboard impact), falls in hyperflexion and direct hyperextension trauma are the most ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Looking through purple coloured glasses here.
Kane is onto it. Must be true.....lol.
Go ask little billy a 5 footy 6 player if he wants to ruck against a 6 foot 5 player. His first reaction will be **** no I'll get injured.This isn't a problem that need a resolution.
Go ask little billy a 5 footy 6 player if he wants to ruck against a 6 foot 5 player. His first reaction will be fu** no I'll get injured.
See when a player is too scared to ruck because of high risk of injury you know you got an issue.
Maybe we should ask people who have rucked before at a local level or afl level. Because to little billy it seems pretty barbaric the idea of two people jumping up and kneeing each other. Lets not kid ourselves ruckman's mindset is lets go out there and smash into them with our knees and win the centre bounce.
Go ask little billy a 5 footy 6 player if he wants to ruck against a 6 foot 5 player. His first reaction will be fu** no I'll get injured.
See when a player is too scared to ruck because of high risk of injury you know you got an issue.
Maybe we should ask people who have rucked before at a local level or afl level. Because to little billy it seems pretty barbaric the idea of two people jumping up and kneeing each other. Lets not kid ourselves ruckman's mindset is lets go out there and smash into them with our knees and win the centre bounce.
Well at local level there are not much tall people. Even at wafl level most players are <200 cm. There is major height and weight disparity.The more important question here should be who gave the idea to little Billy here that he could/should be a ruck man?
Well at local level there are not much tall people. Even at wafl level most players are <200 cm. There is major height and weight disparity.
So the idea of a 185cm ruckman at local level vs 195 cm 120kg ruck isn't that odd
Not at all, would be defending Pittonet if it was reversed.
Take rucking against Nic Nat for example.
If you don’t watch him before the ball, he could step you and grab it out the air. You need opponent awareness to ruck.
All rucks watch their opponent.