MRP / Trib. The MRP chook lotto

[Nunez]

We have given the Tribunal more than enough of a rationale to at the very least downgrade this to careless if not to get him off altogether.

Absolutely.

This absolutely has to be downgraded.

 

[Elixuh]

We have basically backed the Tribunal into a corner. If they uphold the ban based on a single angle video which does not objectively show where Berry is looking, it sets us up for an appeal on grounds of unreasonableness at a minimum.

 

[Hollow Knight]

"Ignore everything they've said, he clearly did it on purpose because I said so".

Basically the legalese translation of “yeah… nah I don’t reckon…”

 

[M Malice]

Pane (AFL): The speed in which the contact happened here is very different to Sloane's. Sloane had a limited view of the face, while Berry had a full view of Oliver's face.

 

[haystark]

Pane (AFL): Oliver was on top of Berry, but this does not excuse the action, which was unreasonable and unnecessary ... the vision provides enough evidence to disregard Berry's evidence that he was unaware of Oliver's eyes.

Rigged from the start then. Was never going to get a fair go.

 

[pulpdriver]

Pane (AFL): The speed in which the contact happened here is very different to Sloane's. Sloane had a limited view of the face, while Berry had a full view of Oliver's face.

lol, got eyes in the side of his head, does he?

 

[Elixuh]

Pane (AFL): The speed in which the contact happened here is very different to Sloane's. Sloane had a limited view of the face, while Berry had a full view of Oliver's face.

Booo get off the stage

 

[Hollow Knight]

Rigged from the start then. Was never going to get a fair go.

That is the AFL counsel’s prosecution argument. It isn’t the view of the Tribunal.

 

[FLVanLandingham]

lets disregard the former player, but listen to a prime minister.

 

[Elixuh]

So long as Lingy or Paul Chapman

Paul Chapman

Age

43

Ht

179cm

Wt

87kg

Pos.

Fwd

Career

Season

Last 5

D

19.7

5star

K

12.8

5star

HB

6.9

4star

M

4.7

4star

T

3.5

5star

G

1.3

5star

No current season stats available

D

6.6

2star

K

4.0

2star

HB

2.6

3star

M

1.0

1star

T

1.8

4star

G

0.2

3star

aren't sitting on the Tribunal tonight we should be ok

 

[M Malice]

Pane (AFL): An AFL footballer of any experience is aware there is no explanation for a raking motion across the eye region.

 

[Nunez]

So long as Lingy or Paul Chapman aren't sitting on the Tribunal tonight we should be ok

Brad Scott, Stevie J and Paul Chapman.

 

[Hollow Knight]

Pane (AFL): An AFL footballer of any experience is aware there is no explanation for a raking motion across the eye region.

Except he literally provided an explanation, supported by medical evidence.

 

[Nunez]

Pane (AFL): An AFL footballer of any experience is aware there is no explanation for a raking motion across the eye region.

Despite the explanation from a medical professional moments ago.

 

[Lets Roar like '44]

The fact our lawyer doesn’t even know his clients first name doesn’t hold me in great comfort.

 

[Kevvo]

Resorting to those sorts of generalities shouldn’t auger well for the argument

 

[M Malice]

Pane (AFL): When one looks at the footage and takes into account the range of actions that were available to Berry ... choosing to make a raking action with his left hand across the player's eye region is unreasonable in the circumstances.

 

[Toffee Lion]

'Pane also says the evidence of Luke Hodge should be given very little weight. – Michael Whiting'

Well that's just rude.

 

[Elixuh]

The fact our lawyer doesn’t even know his clients first name doesn’t hold me in great comfort.

It is a failsafe tactic of last resort. If we can convince the Tribunal that Jarrod Berry doesn't exist but that Jacob Berry has committed this sick act, then Jarrod will be free to play.

 

[FLVanLandingham]

the "raking" motion is such an annoyance.

you say raking, I say lateral movement.

you say intended and unreasonable act, I say look at Oliver you utter flog.

 

[M Malice]

Pane (AFL): The fact that it's not in the eye is not to the point - it's in the eye region.

 

[paulige]

Pane (AFL): The speed in which the contact happened here is very different to Sloane's. Sloane had a limited view of the face, while Berry had a full view of Oliver's face.

If Berry had that close-up a view of Oliver’s face, he would’ve gouged his own eyes out.

 

[martinson]

The fact our lawyer doesn’t even know his clients first name doesn’t hold me in great comfort.

He's no Einstein we know.

Bez has no form for any of this. He's under total duress. Nothing happened anyway.

He has to get off.

 

[Toffee Lion]

Pane (AFL): The fact that it's not in the eye is not to the point - it's in the eye region.

When I have a son and play "gotcha nose", am I going to be rubbed out for a week because it's in the eye region?

 

[Nunez]

Pane (AFL): When one looks at the footage and takes into account the range of actions that were available to Berry ... choosing to make a raking action with his left hand across the player's eye region is unreasonable in the circumstances.

Raking action and grabbing action are literally the same action. He was so obviously going for the jumper.