It doesn't matter what Gil says, that's not going to stop players suing if that's what the advice they get from their legals.There could be a number of reasons for Gil saying what he did. I'm going to go with protecting the AFL.
"How can the players sue us… they were duped by others. If they were duped and were right in amongst it how is the AFL in any position to do anything about what happened at arms length".
I also think if the players were duped that they would have a better case.
But for mine the only way they were duped if they were told thay were getting something different than they signed for.
So the EFC better have something to show for the thymosin they signed for