The Warlord
RuSsIa iS BaD
- Aug 21, 2018
- 32,470
- 81,790
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Thread starter
- #4,426
We sometimes forget just how insanely brutal the war in Ireland was.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
"But Russia isn't flattening cities like Israel is in Gaza"
Yes, they are. And both are as bad as each other.
View attachment 2136835
View attachment 2136837
No sorry Chadwiko you don't get to disagree emoji on this.
What you posted is disgusting genocide denial every bit as bad as Holocaust denial.
LOL I absolutely do, and I'll tell you why;
You sitting there and calling anyone else "disingenuous" on the topic of Russia's invasion of Ukraine is hilarious hypocrisy.
You shift the goalposts and contort yourself in mental gymnastics endlessly in transparent efforts to position yourself as "correct" on all matters of Russia, despite the readily apparent evidence.
First it was "Russia isn't going to invade!", then it was "Well, Russia will be in Kyiv within two weeks", then it was "Well, Russia is winning anyway without Kyiv, this will be over soon", then it was "America and Europe will be withdrawing support", then it was "Russia is winning the war of attrition", then it was "Ukraine will never take Russian territory", then it was "Russia is definitely winning, despite still being in Ukraine two years later!" then it was "Russia's economy is absolutely fine and the sanctions have failed", then it was "Russia doesn't need external troops or military support", then it was "actually it's good that Russia is using North Korean military resources", then it was "Ukraine are definitely losing"... etc etc.
You declaring a victory for Russia is a fortnightly occurrence these days. You can set your watch to it.
(And before you do what you always do and try and derail an argument that you know you're losing by bogging it down in semantics and distractions - the above are examples of paraphrasing. I'm not saying those are direct quotes).
And part of your ongoing campaign of disingenuous bullshit is the notion all along that Russia's invasion has been restrained, and moderate, and downright 'civilised'. Russia are the good guys, and they'd never flatten cities! Which has been absolute nonsense right from the beginning of this conflict and what we saw in Mariupol, but was worth repeating in here today with those photos I shared from Vovchansk.
You sit there and you try and position yourself as this champion of the downtrodden and the victims of the war crimes Israel is committing against Gaza, but do so in the context of not only constantly excusing but actively cheerleading Russia doing similar things in Ukraine.
This notion that Ukraine "choose to fight in cities" and that "Ukrainian weapons have contributed to the destruction!" is laughably pathetic in terms of an attempted justification. You're utterly incapable of ever holding Russia accountable for the atrocities that are happening in this conflict, and it's patently obvious for everyone to see any time they come into this thread. Your name is literally a joke on this website because of it (well, that, and because of how thoroughly you embarrassed yourself under previous usernames, necessitating the constant changes so you don't get laughed out of every conversation you try and insert yourself into).
No, it's not. And you of all people don't get to sit there and act the virtuous champion of what is and isn't 'okay' in these regards. Nice try, but absolutely not.
Come on mate.
You know the Warlord is the moral leader of the world.
LOL I absolutely do, and I'll tell you why;
You sitting there and calling anyone else "disingenuous" on the topic of Russia's invasion of Ukraine is hilarious hypocrisy.
You shift the goalposts and contort yourself in mental gymnastics endlessly in transparent efforts to position yourself as "correct" on all matters of Russia, despite the readily apparent evidence.
First it was "Russia isn't going to invade!", then it was "Well, Russia will be in Kyiv within two weeks", then it was "Well, Russia is winning anyway without Kyiv, this will be over soon", then it was "America and Europe will be withdrawing support", then it was "Russia is winning the war of attrition", then it was "Ukraine will never take Russian territory", then it was "Russia is definitely winning, despite still being in Ukraine two years later!" then it was "Russia's economy is absolutely fine and the sanctions have failed", then it was "Russia doesn't need external troops or military support", then it was "actually it's good that Russia is using North Korean military resources", then it was "Ukraine are definitely losing"... etc etc.
You declaring a victory for Russia is a fortnightly occurrence these days. You can set your watch to it.
(And before you do what you always do and try and derail an argument that you know you're losing by bogging it down in semantics and distractions - the above are examples of paraphrasing. I'm not saying those are direct quotes).
And part of your ongoing campaign of disingenuous bullshit is the notion all along that Russia's invasion has been restrained, and moderate, and downright 'civilised'. Russia are the good guys, and they'd never flatten cities! Which has been absolute nonsense right from the beginning of this conflict and what we saw in Mariupol, but was worth repeating in here today with those photos I shared from Vovchansk.
You sit there and you try and position yourself as this champion of the downtrodden and the victims of the war crimes Israel is committing against Gaza, but do so in the context of not only constantly excusing but actively cheerleading Russia doing similar things in Ukraine.
This notion that Ukraine "choose to fight in cities" and that "Ukrainian weapons have contributed to the destruction!" is laughably pathetic in terms of an attempted justification. You're utterly incapable of ever holding Russia accountable for the atrocities that are happening in this conflict, and it's patently obvious for everyone to see any time they come into this thread. Your name is literally a joke on this website because of it (well, that, and because of how thoroughly you embarrassed yourself under previous usernames, necessitating the constant changes so you don't get laughed out of every conversation you try and insert yourself into).
No, it's not. And you of all people don't get to sit there and act the virtuous champion of what is and isn't 'okay' in these regards. Nice try, but absolutely not.