I think the answer is NO, No.
There are none in the west. They are feasible.
Can we use a different term for the west , since australia is in a similar plane to Vladivostak and much of China?
The Nuclear debate
- Thread starter nut
- Start date
- Tagged users None
I think the answer is NO, No.
There are none in the west. They are feasible.
Can we use a different term for the west , since australia is in a similar plane to Vladivostak and much of China?
I wonder what the odds are of us building one within 20 years thenI think the answer is NO, No.
There are none in the west. They are feasible.
Can we use a different term for the west , since australia is in a similar plane to Vladivostak and much of China?
Small modular reactor - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I wonder what the odds are of us building one within 20 years then
We'd be better off getting it built in China and importing it in a Shipping Container, its what we're good at .
Even our gas fields did that. I saw them on the docks at Brisbane, they looked something like the below.
Our local expertise seems to consist of unloading them, sticking a gasket in the joints and bolting the flanges together.
Yep, we are zero chance of building nuclear. Finland, who already have a strong industry went well over budget and years over time just to add to existing plants.We'd be better off getting it built in China and importing it in a Shipping Container, its what we're good at .
Even our gas fields did that. I saw them on the docks at Brisbane, they looked something like the below.
Our local expertise seems to consist of unloading them, sticking a gasket in the joints and bolting the flanges together.
ZeroI wonder what the odds are of us building one within 20 years then
Which is the clear underlying intent of the Coalitions policy
