Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: GWS Giants v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 65% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
And it's a draw...Kick off on our first game
![]()
Chess: RMuhlberger vs chessyboi93
RMuhlberger (1349) vs chessyboi93 (1431). Game drawn by agreement in 31 moves over 17 hours. Click to review the game, move by move.www.chess.com
Kick off on our first game
![]()
Chess: RMuhlberger vs chessyboi93
RMuhlberger (1349) vs chessyboi93 (1431). Game drawn by agreement in 31 moves over 17 hours. Click to review the game, move by move.www.chess.com
Yes, it's interesting cause Magnus isn't there to stomp his opponent hahaHas anyone been keeping an eye on Ian vs Ding? This is one of the most entertaining WCC in recent memory. I have been watching intently most nights.
Yes, it's interesting cause Magnus isn't there to stomp his opponent haha
Hard to get interested when we all know they're playing for the title of second best player in the world.
They've been great games!Has anyone been keeping an eye on Ian vs Ding? This is one of the most entertaining WCC in recent memory. I have been watching intently most nights.
Think the whole world minus Russia and Belarus are backing Ding here.
I think the eval bar showing Nepo as an almost clear win was a bit misleading, with the engine's plan being pretty obscure for humans, even players like Nepo. But Nepo's, and Ding's, fast play there for a bit leading to those (x) moves was crazy to watch! (And made me feel better about my play)
yes, they showed that when Ian was +2.5 or something that it was only because of a single computer line that you had to see +10 moves in advance where a pawn got through to queening, in every other the way the position was even, but the eval bar shows +2.5 because of that one line.As someone who regularly evals and realises I lost a position from +2, +3 etc, while it’s definitely a big gap at that level, this match has proved a computer win is never that easy to spot as a human.
yes, they showed that when Ian was +2.5 or something that it was only because of a single computer line that you had to see +10 moves in advance where a pawn got through to queening, in every other the way the position was even, but the eval bar shows +2.5 because of that one line.
I called it - tiebreaks here we come! Ding to win 2.5-1.5![]()