- Sep 15, 2011
- 5,623
- 9,371
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Liverpool FC, Lakers, Longhorns
I think its pretty obvious that the AFL including the new CEO had some pretty clear views on how this should be cleaned up prior to a proper investigation being conducted. These coincided with the ALP's view to clean the mess up quickly. EFC initially wanted the mess cleaned up but have gone ape when the SC were issued.
EFC/HIRD have gone after the organisation that has played as straight a bat as it could given the national impact of the investigation. ASADA has not played ball by sticking to its remit that it has focused not on pleasing the AFL or the government or doing deals but has instead in the long term focussed on the alleged PED taking by EFC players.
Hird would have had a strong case to take the AFL to court to avoid the penalties but chose not to. His testimony seemed to be all about damaging the AFL, revenge has been his primary focus.
The new AFL CEO should step down given the admitted role he has played, unfortunately you can't fire Vlad.
EFC/HIRD have gone after the organisation that has played as straight a bat as it could given the national impact of the investigation. ASADA has not played ball by sticking to its remit that it has focused not on pleasing the AFL or the government or doing deals but has instead in the long term focussed on the alleged PED taking by EFC players.
Hird would have had a strong case to take the AFL to court to avoid the penalties but chose not to. His testimony seemed to be all about damaging the AFL, revenge has been his primary focus.
The new AFL CEO should step down given the admitted role he has played, unfortunately you can't fire Vlad.