The Swans Blog

[The Swans Blog]

Match Report

 

[The Swans Blog]

Player ratings:

 

[Grand Uncle Horace]

Good write up. Particularly enjoyed the Campaignard rating. Has there been a more finger pointing, team mate abusing player since Buckley?

 

[The Swans Blog]

NEAFL write ups

 

[The Swans Blog]

Kurtly? Naismith? Sinclair?

 

[Mick Oxlong]

44 Hitouts and you're calling it 'regularly beaten'? You're ****ing kidding right?

 

[swansfan51]

Every single player in the team had an above average game huh? That's astonishing, especially as we lost. And the comments for guys like Johnson, Wicks, Ronke etc certainly don't support them getting above average ratings, but they still did.

 

[The King!]

Might be time to write a review of the blog

 

[The Swans Blog]

I've already explained my ratings before. Everyone starts at 6.
<6 is below average to very poor
6 is average, not good, not bad
6.5 is a pass
7 is a decent game
7.5 is a good game
8 is a very good game
8.5 is great
9 is amazing
10 is franklin/godly

 

[Mick Oxlong]

I've already explained my ratings before. Everyone starts at 6.
<6 is below average to very poor
6 is average, not good, not bad
6.5 is a pass
7 is a decent game
7.5 is a good game
8 is a very good game
8.5 is great
9 is amazing
10 is franklin/godly

Well that's a ****ing awesome system...so Lloyd could possibly get another 6 for being concussed in the early minutes of a game again? If 6 is average, Swans Blog gets a 6?

 

[The Swans Blog]

Well that's a ******* awesome system...so Lloyd could possibly get another 6 for being concussed in the early minutes of a game again? If 6 is average, Swans Blog gets a 6?

You can rate it whatever you want. It's based on soccer scoring - which I used while coaching soccer - because it's a fairer scoring system. It means poor performances don't necessarily receive scathing reviews and there's more latitude to express it.

Make up your own scale if you want, I sure won't be using the AFL or SEN ratings.

Lloyd would also get an NA. At least a reasonable amount of time has to pass for a player to get a rating.

 

[The Swans Blog]

Latest podcast is up!

#SwansCast Episode 15 - Is Towers our Mr September?

 

[The Swans Blog]

Captain Kennedy 10 votes!

 

[The Swans Blog]

Today's press conference - Longmire backs in midfield against Danger-wood pair

 

[The Swans Blog]

The #SwansCast will be recording a LIVE Podcast after the end of the season, regardless of result!
Details to come...

Let us know if you'll be joining in, asking us questions or willing to jump in for an interview!

 

[The Swans Blog]

Better late than never!

 

[The Swans Blog]

Better late than never!

 

[Mick Oxlong]

I'll beat you to the ratings Chumpy...everyone gets a 6, which in reality is a pass! Above average, yet below average! Swans Blog over!

 

[The Swans Blog]

Match Report - Blimey

Player ratings - Bugger off!

 

[Mick Oxlong]

OMG...what a joke those ratings are!

 

[scaryness]

How does Sinclair get a higher rating than 5 other players? Your 2.5 rating is a higher number than the amount of ball he had and he was in the ruck for a fair chunk in the second half.

 

[scaryness]

Will chuck in some of my own for discussions sake.

5:
Jack
McVeigh
Hewett
Heeney
Jones

4:
Towers
Lloyd
Mills

3:
Smith
Kennedy
Papley
Newman
Parker

2:
Reid
Grundy
Rampe

1:
Rohan
Franklin
Cunningham
Naismith
Sinclair

 

[swansfan51]

Will chuck in some of my own for discussions sake.

3:
Papley

1:
Rohan
Sinclair

Generous

 

[The Swans Blog]

How does Sinclair get a higher rating than 5 other players? Your 2.5 rating is a higher number than the amount of ball he had and he was in the ruck for a fair chunk in the second half.

Forward delivery was shocking while he played forward and couldn't get near it let alone any of our forwards. Never going to outruck Smith and Stanley.

Still tried so ge gets a rating for that.

 

[The Swans Blog]