Not Important
never test the depth of water with both feet.
- Oct 4, 2016
- 9,168
- 14,958
- AFL Club
- Tasmania
umpires who are up to the task. time dar handed in his ball counter.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Agree. Sweep shots don’t count.Less sweep shots IMO
Well it looks like it may well happen ASAPI'll tell you what cricket doesn't need: four day tests.
It's just corporates trying to force results more frequently and quicker.I'll tell you what cricket doesn't need: four day tests.
the champ was 'donning' a Grill... um barbecue... no that is just where I was sitting when I was listening to the radio...Even AB donned the Hilditch Grill when facing Ambrose, Marshall, Walsh and Bishop in 88/89.
A "global search" finds a CEO who just happens to be on the board, and it doesn't work out?Cricket Australia set to axe CEO as tensions finally hit breaking point
Cricket Australia set to axe CEO as tensions finally hit breaking pointwww.foxsports.com.au
CA needs a new CEO
I'll tell you what cricket doesn't need: four day tests.
In the spirit of the opening post, I saw some highlights of Lara’s 375 the other night. He scored his last 80 or so wearing a cap against the quicks, while little Shiv on debut sported a helmet with white ear guards that would have been lucky to turn away a decent sized blowfly, and looked like a cauldron on his golf ball sized head. Nearly brought a tear to the eye
Earl Eddings interview: 'We need 10-20 strong Test playing nations, not three or four'
The Cricket Australia chairman spoke to ESPNcricinfo about the dramas of 2020, the new ICC chair and the future of Test cricket, the BBL, succession issues and the rapidly changing media landscapewww.espncricinfo.com
while I don't disagree that we need more competitive Test nations, expecting/hoping to get between 10-20 strong playing Test nations is just not going to happen.
why do we need more test playing nations when we wouldn't even play them ?
we've played england 56 times since 2000, yet bangladesh, zimbabwe, ireland and afghanistan a total of 8 times.
having already 12 test nations and not playing them evenly simply isn't right.
i think the likes of scotland, netherlands etc have a fair way to go before applying for test status - 20/20's and odi status are probably the way to go for these nations for now still.
A few more up-to-the-standard test teams would go a long way to fixing many of the problems tbf. Playing India every few years bores me, but there's not many alternatives for a competitive series. Maybe NZ in NZ right now, but we don't get there until 23/24, so that's probably past this current peak they're at.Earl Eddings interview: 'We need 10-20 strong Test playing nations, not three or four'
The Cricket Australia chairman spoke to ESPNcricinfo about the dramas of 2020, the new ICC chair and the future of Test cricket, the BBL, succession issues and the rapidly changing media landscapewww.espncricinfo.com
while I don't disagree that we need more competitive Test nations, expecting/hoping to get between 10-20 strong playing Test nations is just not going to happen.
A few more up-to-the-standard test teams would go a long way to fixing many of the problems tbf. Playing India every few years bores me, but there's not many alternatives for a competitive series. Maybe NZ in NZ right now, but we don't get there until 23/24, so that's probably past this current peak they're at.
The Ashes obviously goes without saying. Even if we are pummeling them it's greatly satisfying, and vice versa for them. So it still draws.
Bullying the likes of Sri Lanka or the West Indies just feels a bit mean after a while and you can see why it doesn't draw a crowd.
As I was typing it I was trying to recall some away series in my head as I thought we lost a couple. Vs Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh did come to mind, though it's been so long I wasn't completely sure.HERE there are not many alternatives for a competitive series, but if Australia catches a plane, they will get a competitive series.
Their most recent trip, and the result:
Sri Lanka - Loss
Bangladesh - Draw
Pakistan - Loss
SA - Loss
England - Draw
India - Loss
West Indies - Win
NZ - Win
I would back NZ in NZ to beat them right now and on the right tracks I'd even give the West Indies a chance of at least making the batsmen struggle, even if they were getting castled for 200 themselves.
The Ashes has been good recently because the teams have been evenly matched but it was ****ing boring for about 25 years before that.A few more up-to-the-standard test teams would go a long way to fixing many of the problems tbf. Playing India every few years bores me, but there's not many alternatives for a competitive series. Maybe NZ in NZ right now, but we don't get there until 23/24, so that's probably past this current peak they're at.
The Ashes obviously goes without saying. Even if we are pummeling them it's greatly satisfying, and vice versa for them. So it still draws.
Bullying the likes of Sri Lanka or the West Indies just feels a bit mean after a while and you can see why it doesn't draw a crowd.