Thornton

Remove this Banner Ad

No way in hell should we trade him for Tim Boyle.

Carlton rejected it last season, and for all the right reasons too.

Injury prone, and is known to go missing during games. No, just no.
 
Not sure you will get much for him. He looked OK up forward.He also seems a good leader for the rest of the back line and Jammo Bower and Waite need someone to control their enthusiasm
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Thornton is a solid backman. I very much doubt anyone at the club (with any say) has even had the slightest thought of trading him.

*awaits wdgann's imminent outpouring of rubbish*
 
Why would you want to trade a guy who is 193cm, can kick both feet and attack from the half back line and also defend on a key big or small forward when necessary.

Gunslinger you should check your medication as there are teams out there who would be willing to depart with a fair bit to get him.
 
Why would you want to trade a guy who is 193cm, can kick both feet and attack from the half back line and also defend on a key big or small forward when necessary.

Gunslinger you should check your medication as there are teams out there who would be willing to depart with a fair bit to get him.
Perhaps but as I would prefer to hold onto him as I think he is important for us it does not matter. That was my point sorry.
What was Hawthorn offering for him last year?
 
He's in the middle of a big form slump, I think is carrying an injury and probably not pushing himself at training. People forget how good players are when they arent plaaying well.

No trade.
 
Easy trade period:


First Trade

Fisher and Pick 4 to Hawthorn for Beau Dowler

Love Fish but can't kick, he and our 4th pick may get a Dowler. This allows Hawthorn to move on a guy to give him a go and gives Carlton a potential option up front.

Second Trade

Lucky Dip

Saddington to Hawthorn in straight swap for Tim Boyle

Hawks lack another backmen, Saddington although not setting the world on fire may give them an interim option, just as much as Boyle has and not been used.

We get a potentially half descent marking option if he can stay on the park.

Third Trade

Thornton and Bentick / Carrazzo to Sydney for Ryan Okeefe

Sydney would play hardball, but Thornton and Bentick may give them something to work with and enough to trade Okeefe back to Victoria.

Carrazzo may replace Bentick.

Okeefe is in a different class but would add that grunt and class factor up front.

Depends if he wants to leave a smuch as some have subtly mentioned.

Fourth Trade

Our second pick to Fremantle for Warnock

He and Hampson can share the ruck duties.

Gives us time to develop Kreuz more.

Look, just a fly by the night options, but I don't think Kosi, Kerr or Brown would be ideal due to the work needed to get the deal done, particularly Brown and Kerr.

I do accept that it has been said that we want to keep our picks, but our first rounder will be good.

We can really make some in roads.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Easy trade period:


First Trade

Fisher and Pick 4 to Hawthorn for Beau Dowler

Love Fish but can't kick, he and our 4th pick may get a Dowler. This allows Hawthorn to move on a guy to give him a go and gives Carlton a potential option up front.

Second Trade

Lucky Dip

Saddington to Hawthorn in straight swap for Tim Boyle

Hawks lack another backmen, Saddington although not setting the world on fire may give them an interim option, just as much as Boyle has and not been used.

We get a potentially half descent marking option if he can stay on the park.

Third Trade

Thornton and Bentick / Carrazzo to Sydney for Ryan Okeefe

Sydney would play hardball, but Thornton and Bentick may give them something to work with and enough to trade Okeefe back to Victoria.

Carrazzo may replace Bentick.

Okeefe is in a different class but would add that grunt and class factor up front.

Depends if he wants to leave a smuch as some have subtly mentioned.

Fourth Trade

Our second pick to Fremantle for Warnock

He and Hampson can share the ruck duties.

Gives us time to develop Kreuz more.

Look, just a fly by the night options, but I don't think Kosi, Kerr or Brown would be ideal due to the work needed to get the deal done, particularly Brown and Kerr.

I do accept that it has been said that we want to keep our picks, but our first rounder will be good.

We can really make some in roads.


No on all of those trades!

Would love to think we could get something for Saddo, but really, he's done!
Would prefer fisher over Dowler.

We are not going to get o'keefe at that price, and i dont think we really want him.

Warnock is young and just learning the game himself and would be no short term fix!
 
Do people here actually understand that in general, we are not trading with complete idiots, and hence, we are not going to trade Saddington, who, despite being injury free, hasn't been able to crack a senior game until last week, even when our best young defender was injured?
Austin was preferred over him.

Bentick ISN'T tradable. Barely gets a game with us, and sure as shit won't get us O'Keefe......try a first round pick for ROK.......not two blokes with questionable decision making and disposal.

By Fisher and pick 4, do you mean our 4th round pick?
4th round and a bloke who can't kick for a former 1st round pick?

Yes.........it really is that easy.

While we are at it I'm sure we can convince WCE to take Ackland as a backup ruck.......for say.....Kerr........and why not throw in our 5th round pick.:cool:

Apologies to Barnsey if you were actually taking the piss.:thumbsu:
 
W D Gann is spot on with everything he has said about Stumblebutt Thornton.

There seems to be a useless dud at every club that keeps getting a game and the supporters have blind affection for (ie McManus).

Thornton, to put it bluntly, is a player of a bygone era. He is slow, he is undersize, he is indecisive and his skills are lacking. The game has passed him by.

NO club would trade a thing for him. We missed our chance with Hawthorn all because of that goat Smorgon and his board playing political games with our playing list.
 
Do people here actually understand that in general, we are not trading with complete idiots, and hence, we are not going to trade Saddington, who, despite being injury free, hasn't been able to crack a senior game until last week, even when our best young defender was injured?
Austin was preferred over him.

Bentick ISN'T tradable. Barely gets a game with us, and sure as shit won't get us O'Keefe......try a first round pick for ROK.......not two blokes with questionable decision making and disposal.

By Fisher and pick 4, do you mean our 4th round pick?
4th round and a bloke who can't kick for a former 1st round pick?

Yes.........it really is that easy.

While we are at it I'm sure we can convince WCE to take Ackland as a backup ruck.......for say.....Kerr........and why not throw in our 5th round pick.:cool:

Apologies to Barnsey if you were actually taking the piss.:thumbsu:
I agree with your comments. The only players we may need to get rid of and who may be tradeable are: Fisher, Thornton, Backwell, Bentick and Jackson. I'm not sure if we could get much more than a 3rd round pick for either of them unless we did a "multi" trade.
The delistee's are Ackland, Saddington,
 
W D Gann is spot on with everything he has said about Stumblebutt Thornton.

There seems to be a useless dud at every club that keeps getting a game and the supporters have blind affection for (ie McManus).

Thornton, to put it bluntly, is a player of a bygone era. He is slow, he is undersize, he is indecisive and his skills are lacking. The game has passed him by.

NO club would trade a thing for him. We missed our chance with Hawthorn all because of that goat Smorgon and his board playing political games with our playing list.

I guess you missed his game on Brett Ebert at the weekend. I suggest you keep an eye on the B & F count at the end of this season. He will be up there in the top 10, indicating that the club value his contribution, even if you don't.

I don't know if T-Bird stole your girlfriend or something similar, but your disdain for him ranks right up there with other Carlton supporters of similar ilk who look for the negative in Fev, Carrazzo, Cloke etc. I guess this explains why your opinion only finds its way onto an internet forum & is not keenly sought by the Carlton Football Club.
 
MS, we wouldn't get one bite if we put Thornton up for trade at the end of the year.

He is deficient in all areas of the modern game. FFS Brett Ebert hasn't got a sniff all year. He did nothing and Thornton did nothing. No run off him...nothing.

He's not up to it and won't , or shouldn't get a game when Bower returns next year.

Bower, Waite and Jamo are streets ahead of him as players of similar build. Hopefully Austin will be the bigger bodied defender in a year or two time. Heater,Grigg,Browne and others are our rebounders.

I'm not sure why it is so hard for some supporters to admit one of their players is not good enough. i just don't get it. it's not being disloyal, just realistic.
 
Is it just me or does anyone else really hate it when fellow supporters bag out carlton players?

Thornton pissed me off with that whole wanting to leave for the hawks thing but sheesh.

He's done enough this year to warrant a spot in the 22. Had a few really good games (without starring) IMO.

Im just really sick of threads bagging (in a personal and underhanded way) half the team - Russell, Thornton, Fisher, Saddingtton, Ackland, Bentick, Wiggins (ffs the man has more courage and passion than many at our lub), Simpson etc etc etc...

Who do we think we are... Richmond?

An honest discussion about percieved weaknesses (with facts to back it up) and an honest assesment of where a player is at (and where they fit into the team structure) is one thing, but personal attacks of carlton players really... shits me.
 
should we trade him to say hawthorn for boyle or trade himto another team for a pick or should we keep him?

thoughts

???

Our backline has performed fantastic this year and you want to get rid of one of the generals who has been pretty good for us this year and for the past 5 years IMO.

We finally have a decent backline, leave it be.
 
Do people here actually understand that in general, we are not trading with complete idiots, and hence, we are not going to trade Saddington, who, despite being injury free, hasn't been able to crack a senior game until last week, even when our best young defender was injured?
Austin was preferred over him.

Bentick ISN'T tradable. Barely gets a game with us, and sure as shit won't get us O'Keefe......try a first round pick for ROK.......not two blokes with questionable decision making and disposal.

By Fisher and pick 4, do you mean our 4th round pick?
4th round and a bloke who can't kick for a former 1st round pick?

Yes.........it really is that easy.

While we are at it I'm sure we can convince WCE to take Ackland as a backup ruck.......for say.....Kerr........and why not throw in our 5th round pick.:cool:

Apologies to Barnsey if you were actually taking the piss.:thumbsu:


Blue Bear, i'm 110% with you on this.

Its like people are trying to trade a Datsun 180B for a VE Holden Commodore and still get change back. :rolleyes:

If people start threads and want fruitfull discussion, then throw up something realistic.

If we were to trade Thronton (and i say 'if' becuase I dont know why we would want to) then something more realistic i.e. Thornton for Thorpe/Dowler + maybe draft pick thrown in there is more realistic and then maybe we can all have some sort of positive discussion as to why it would or wouldnt work.

IMO if we were to trade for a top line player, i.e. ROK, Brown, Kozi etc etc we would just about have to part with a 1st pick. Because we are winning games doesnt mean all of our players have currency.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Thornton

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top