dogs105
Sweet Kennels Proprietor
It was a great effort from Weatherald to finish the catch after Laughlin's superb work too.Anyway kids... about that Tippet bloke. Sad to see. Seemed like a good guy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was a great effort from Weatherald to finish the catch after Laughlin's superb work too.Anyway kids... about that Tippet bloke. Sad to see. Seemed like a good guy.
lelThis is bizarre.
There is no evidence on who proposed the dodgy Tippett clause
Some random claims to have had it confirmed that the bad guys were all on the other side, despite the other side alleging the same thing in reverse
Said random struggles to understand why that’s not confirmation
And now we have an equally random parachuter from the sky (or a late night bar) contributing even less coherent drivel without even pretending to follow thread or understand issues
The off-season sucks
lel
i'm a random. excellent
lay off the ice dudeIntoxicated random. Do try to follow
It wasn't meant to be. I am legitimately curious.It wasn’t funny the first time.
I'm afraid you're wrong on this one. When a club acts within the rules but in a manner the AFL frowns upon, the AFL has the power to intervene. They've done this in the past. It all depends on whether they're sufficiently motivated to do so.Kane, the AFL can publicly spruik what they like .....but the AFL rules ultimately are what's applied .....can you imagine the outrage if clubs saw "tailored" rules for certain clubs