Confirmed Tom Barrass & 2025 F4 (WCE) traded to Hawthorn for 2025 F1, F2 & F3 (all Haw)

[Hawks_Footy]

So neither hawthorn or west coast officials have publically come out and made a definitive statement on what the cost of the trade will be...

 

[Hawker399]

If Frost ends up leaving to a club they hope it's Sydney. Trade 30, 74 and Frost for 19.
Give 13 & 19 to Sydney for Barrass & F3

More like pick 19 only.

 

[Sherriff Incorporated]

More like pick 19 only.

Yeah that ain't happening.

 

[Obeanie1]

More like pick 19 only.

School holidays already?

 

[Hawks_Footy]

Frost isn't worth a first rounder & I highly doubt we'd consider trading him.

13 and a bit more will be the deal.. Listening to Matt Clarke on gettable the Eagles really really like this draft so i'd suggest another asset in this draft along with 13 is the deal they want.

 

[TazHawk15]

So neither hawthorn or west coast officials have publically come out and made a definitive statement on what the cost of the trade will be...

It will be our first then a swap of picks, everyone knows this including the WCE supporters in here who think Barass is some kind of C.Langford.

 

[TylerDurden]

13 will be an elite player anyway. I don't get the greed here.
Bloke is 29, 2 years younger than Frost - who had a top year.

 

[stallon]

So neither hawthorn or west coast officials have publically come out and made a definitive statement on what the cost of the trade will be...

Clubs generally do it through the media, which is reporting west coast want 2 firsts and the hawks dont wanna do that

 

[stallon]

13 will be an elite player anyway. I don't get the greed here.
Bloke is 29, 2 years younger than Frost - who had a top year.

Its not greed to not want to get shafted

 

[Hawks_Footy]

Its not greed to not want to get shafted

So you think pick 13 for Barrass is being shafted?

 

[I got the outside word]

Its not greed to not want to get shafted

This would make sense if the topic wasn’t a 29 year old defender with back issues.

I rate Tom as a defender but two firsts for him is a bit greedy. I mean, if you don’t want to get shafted and receive two firsts why would we want to get shafted and give two firsts up?

 

[Philhawk]

 

[bzparkes]

So neither hawthorn or west coast officials have publically come out and made a definitive statement on what the cost of the trade will be...

Why would they? Trade period is weeks away.

 

[Barrybran]

So you think pick 13 for Barrass is being shafted?

Ideally we would receive a top 10 pick for a player of Barrass' calibre. That's not likely to happen via the Hawks so we ask for a pick swap involving Hawthorn's 2025 first.

 

[The Golden Glenferrie]

Ideally we would receive a top 10 pick for a player of Barrass' calibre. That's not likely to happen via the Hawks so we ask for a pick swap involving Hawthorn's 2025 first.

 

[THE_GUN]

Ideally we would receive a top 10 pick for a player of Barrass' calibre. That's not likely to happen via the Hawks so we ask for a pick swap involving Hawthorn's 2025 first.

value #10 (in your opinion)
Hawks have #13

Close enough is good enough so lets throw in a F3 to get it done

 

[CatToTheFuture]

Any legitimate source on the 2 x 1st rounders or just media speculation?

They would never not ask for it. Getting it is substantially a different conversation

 

[Obeanie1]

13 will be an elite player anyway. I don't get the greed here.
Bloke is 29, 2 years younger than Frost - who had a top year.

You don't understand why a club at the bottom of the ladder would want top dollar at the trade table for a top shelf 29 year old fullback with 3 years remaining on their contract?

After a club has chased said player whilst under contract and offered them 4 to 5 years on $800k plus.

 

[Dewwwww]

Eagles have 2 years to hit the draft hard before it becomes compromised due to Tasmania entering the comp

They want this deal done as much as Hawthorn does.

Forget 2x first rounders. It will be pick 13 plus a late 2nd / early 3rd or player etc. A 3rd club may get involved to get the deal done.

We will give you 3x first rounders next year when we come hunting for Harley

 

[Obeanie1]

Eagles have 2 years to hit the draft hard before it becomes compromised due to Tasmania entering the comp

They want this deal done as much as Hawthorn does.

Forget 2x first rounders. It will be pick 13 plus a late 2nd / early 3rd or player etc. A 3rd club may get involved to get the deal done.

We will give you 3x first rounders next year when we come hunting for Harley

If you are going to dream.

Dream big.

 

[stallon]

This would make sense if the topic wasn’t a 29 year old defender with back issues.

I rate Tom as a defender but two firsts for him is a bit greedy. I mean, if you don’t want to get shafted and receive two firsts why would we want to get shafted and give two firsts up?

nobody in here is saying the trade is 2 firsts though. 13+ a pick that falls in the mid to late teen with a very early 2nd going back is not the same as 2 firsts.

Its a bit dishonest to call it just 2 firsts

 

[stallon]

So you think pick 13 for Barrass is being shafted?

Yes

 

[CaptainWorpedo]

You don't understand why a club at the bottom of the ladder would want top dollar at the trade table for a top shelf 29 year old fullback with 3 years remaining on their contract?

After a club has chased said player whilst under contract and offered them 4 to 5 years on $800k plus.

Just Because we want something, doesn’t mean it is the true value of an asset.

I’d like the eagles to give us two first round picks for DGB, does that mean you should?

Hawks are still developing as well and we haven’t been gifted draft picks or even our original first round selected we should have had before a compromised draft.

 

[Hawks_Footy]

nobody in here is saying the trade is 2 firsts though. 13+ a pick that falls in the mid to late teen with a very early 2nd going back is not the same as 2 firsts.

Its a bit dishonest to call it just 2 firsts

"Nobody is saying the trade is 2 firsts".. but give us pick 13 + another pick that falls in the mid teens.. that's 2 first rounders if i'm not mistaken?

 

[stallon]

"Nobody is saying the trade is 2 firsts".. but give us pick 13 + another pick that falls in the mid teens.. that's 2 first rounders if i'm not mistaken?

Its not just 2 first rounders though is it? The trade is for substantially less value than 2 first rounders.
A late first for an early 2nd isnt that big of a leap