Recruiting Trade & Free Agency VIII

What should we do with our first round picks?

  • Take 6 & 7 to the draft

    Votes: 20 25.3%
  • Trade up the order so we can get Logan McDonald

    Votes: 21 26.6%
  • Split 7 to get the other trades done

    Votes: 27 34.2%
  • Something else...

    Votes: 11 13.9%

  • Total voters
    79

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
ATTENTION OPPOSITION POSTERS: You are on the Essendon board - not the draft board, or the main board or your club board. You are welcome to post here but you will mind your manners or you will be carded. Don't waltz in here telling the locals what's happening/not happening, what's dumb etc. By the same token sealioning will also not be tolerated so be warned. You do not have equal standing here no matter how right you think you are.

Draft Combine
Tuesday October 1 - Friday October 4

AFL Grand Final
Saturday October 24

Free Agency Window
Friday October 30 – Friday November 6


AFL Trade Period (Players and picks)
Wednesday November 4 – 7.30pm Thursday November 12


List Lodgement 1
Wednesday November 25


Delisted Free Agency Window 1
Thursday November 26 - Sunday November 29

List Lodgement 2 (Final date for primary list delistings)
Monday November 30


Delisted Free Agency Window 2
Monday November 30 - Tuesday December 1

AFL Trade Period (Picks only)
Concludes Thursday December 3

National Draft
7pm Wednesday December 9

Preseason and Rookie Drafts
12pm Thursday December 10


Final List Lodgement
Mid-December (tbc)


Pre-Season Supplemental Selection Period (SSP)
Wednesday January 6, 2021 – will conclude prior to the start of the 2021 Toyota AFL Premiership Season
Any issues with it post in this thread:

Draft discussion goes here: Draft Watch

Father/Son & NGA discussion goes here: James Hird Academy (Father/Son and Next Generation)

Poll results: Who should stay? | Which key forward do you want? | What would you give up to get Josh Dunkley?
 
Last edited:
The notion Caldwell is worth more because of the 2 years put into him is ridiculous. It’s case by case for 1st draft picks whether they have improved their value.
Say
Is dow worth more than a top 3 pick?
Is O’Brien worth more than a top 10 pick?
Is chayce jones worth a top 10 pick?

While the other way
Butters is worth more than pick 12 now imo and Duursma has held his value and you’d give up and pick in the teens for.
 
Im happy to say no for Caldwell especially when Hately gets done for a 2nd or third

At least their stance gives you a bit of an indication of who they rate more.

I’m pretty confident Caldwell is a much more talented player, just doesn’t have the heigh that Hately does.
 
At least their stance gives you a bit of an indication of who they rate more.

I’m pretty confident Caldwell is a much more talented player, just doesn’t have the heigh that Hately does.
Also has injuries compared to Hately. Hately also has leadership
 

Log in to remove this ad.

So why are we after Caldwell then?

What's the first thing Dodoro will say about him in a presser?

We think his injuries have impacted his ability but we wanted him for depth?
 
I never go anywhere else, other boards are impossible to navigate and they’ve all got 5 threads happening on the same subject.

On Wright, longer quarters favour him because he’ll run all day and continue to present and generally relies on good, smart craft than other worldly athleticism and creativity.

Eager to see what he brings to the table
Seems to me there are two Wrights; the one who can run all day and needs to develop Nick Riewoldt-like leading patterns to take advantage of that, and the one who provides no second efforts when the ball is in dispute. So, we still have a delivery problem regardless if we think we can sit it on his head inside 50.

I would still prefer McDonald. I can't see any way we acquire Dunkley and still trade up to Pick 2 unless Carlton give us their future first for Saad and the Dogs accept that.
 
If we're going after Caldwell with a 4 year deal we think he's pretty good dont we?

What exactly is the argument in response when GWS say that they want a first round pick which they only just used 2 year ago having developed him for the last 2 years?

What we're we going to trade Parish, Francis or Laverde for at the end of year 2?
I’m a proponent of looking at the contract to determine relative worth of a player. Saad is definitely worth a top 10 pick based on what Carlton are offering. Caldwell a late first based on the 4 years. Top 10 is too much, but definitely a late first for Caldwell.
 
So why are we after Caldwell then?

What's the first thing Dodoro will say about him in a presser?

We think his injuries have impacted his ability but we wanted him for depth?

history of trading suggests that if A first round pick hasn’t established themselves in best 22 after 2 years their value drops into second round and beyond.

not to say it doesn’t happen or Caldwell isn’t worth a first round pick but it’s the way it is.
 
So why are we after Caldwell then?

What's the first thing Dodoro will say about him in a presser?

We think his injuries have impacted his ability but we wanted him for depth?
No one doubts his talent and he's projected to become a good player, but potential doesn't mean his value stays the same.

They'll trade Hately (pick 14) for a second rounder, but expect one of our top 10 picks for Caldwell (pick 11)? Nah.
Hately played 18 games and Caldwell played 11 games. Doesn't add up.
 
No one doubts his talent and he's projected to become a good player, but potential doesn't mean his value stays the same.

They'll trade Hately (pick 14) for a second rounder, but expect one of our top 10 picks for Caldwell (pick 11)? Nah.
Hately played 18 games and Caldwell played 11 games. Doesn't add up.


So it's entirely impossible that GWS rates Caldwell higher?

GWS basically said nothing about losing Hately.

When St Kilda was leading the running for Caldwell there were quotes from GWS people to the effect that there should be increased mandatory contracts for first round picks because Jye, like others, is perfectly happy until someone gets in his ear.

For what it's worth i wouldn't give up a top 20 pick for Caldwell. I just dont follow the criticism of the Giants' position. You keep losing first round picks for significantly discounted value and the arse falls out pretty quickly.
 
Last edited:
No one doubts his talent and he's projected to become a good player, but potential doesn't mean his value stays the same.

They'll trade Hately (pick 14) for a second rounder, but expect one of our top 10 picks for Caldwell (pick 11)? Nah.
Hately played 18 games and Caldwell played 11 games. Doesn't add up.
Going on Davis’ comments they definitely rate him very high internally, just the way we rated Ridley very high internally and he popped this year. Does that mean Caldwell is worth a top 10 pick - no.
 
So it's entirely impossible that GWS 4ates Caldwell higher?

GWS basically said nothing about losing Hately.

When St Kilda was leading the running for Caldwell there were quotes from GWS people to tge effect that there should be increased mandatory contracts for first round picks because Jye, like others, is perfectly happy until someone gets in his ear.

For what it's worth i wouldn't give up a top 20 pick for Caldwell. I just dont follow the criticism of the Giants' position. You keep losing first round pick for significantly discounted value and the arse falls out pretty quickly.
GWS are full of first round picks. I have little sympathy for a team that plays in a grand final and then recruits Tom Green the same year. They literally cannot fit Caldwell into their midfield next year because they have a potential brownlow medalist in Green ready to break out.

GWS know they cannot provide Caldwell with what he wants so blaming it on us or St Kilda is deflecting.
At the end of the day, GWS can say whatever they want. They're not going to get one of our top 10 picks. Early second or late first is the most they'll get.
They'll have to accept that their team full of first-round talent will shed some talented players for a discounted price due to limited available spots.
 
So it's entirely impossible that GWS rates Caldwell higher?

GWS basically said nothing about losing Hately.

When St Kilda was leading the running for Caldwell there were quotes from GWS people to the effect that there should be increased mandatory contracts for first round picks because Jye, like others, is perfectly happy until someone gets in his ear.

For what it's worth i wouldn't give up a top 20 pick for Caldwell. I just dont follow the criticism of the Giants' position. You keep losing first round picks for significantly discounted value and the arse falls out pretty quickly.
FWIW I think he’s worth a late first round pick, our 2021 second round selection is likely to be not far behind that in a stronger draft but they rejected it. Fair enough but in the end it may be close to that.

Right now it makes sense for them to hold their ground and push Essendon for more. If we split a first with Brisbane or Geelong then one of them (not 13) would be fair.

However there is no doubt in my mind McCartney is still upset over Stringer and that is part of it.
 
So why are we after Caldwell then?

What's the first thing Dodoro will say about him in a presser?

We think his injuries have impacted his ability but we wanted him for depth?
Great young kid, barracked for Essendon growing up*, wonderful athlete, works hard, might’ve grown 2cm since he was drafted, versatile, has played mostly forward but he can have an impact through the midfield as well and will be a great player for us.

Did I miss anything?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Great young kid, barracked for St Kilda growing up*, wonderful athlete, works hard, might’ve grown 2cm since he was drafted, versatile, has played mostly forward but he can have an impact through the midfield as well and will be a great player for us.

Did I miss anything?
FTFY
 
Great young kid, barracked for Essendon growing up*, wonderful athlete, works hard, might’ve grown 2cm since he was drafted, versatile, has played mostly forward but he can have an impact through the midfield as well and will be a great player for us.

Did I miss anything?


Former first round pick. We rated him as one of the top players in the draft.
 
Suspect I've got the late news at 10 but Ryley Stoddart, quick small defender from the Swans has been de-listed.

That provably simplifies things.

From here I want:

-Wright
-Ronke
-Dunkley (no more than 1× fiinst and 1 x second round picks)
-Stoddart DFA
-Laverde 1 year
-Crauford 1 year
-2x first round 2020
-Eyre
-Brand
 
Suspect I've got the late news at 10 but Ryley Stoddart, quick small defender from the Swans has been de-listed.

That provably simplifies things.

From here I want:

-Wright
-Ronke
-Dunkley (no more than 1× fiinst and 1 x second round picks)
-Stoddart DFA
-Laverde 1 year
-Crauford 1 year
-2x first round 2020
-Eyre
-Brand
Yeah he was cut in October
 
Great young kid, barracked for Essendon growing up*, wonderful athlete, works hard, might’ve grown 2cm since he was drafted, versatile, has played mostly forward but he can have an impact through the midfield as well and will be a great player for us.

Did I miss anything?
No
i think you have hit the nail on the head
only the top 5 you would draft in from of him
i think perhaps we trade 7 for two Geelong or two Brisbane picks and give one to gws
i watched him a fair bit for bendigo and Geelong grammar and when his body allowed him to lose the shackles he was super impressive as an inside/ outside midfielder
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top