Trade possibilities??

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

How about Bullen + pick 55 for pick 46. Sounds like both clubs would be happy that way, Port get a bloke they say that they want and we upgrade our 4th pick to a late third rounder.
 
:thumbsdown: YOU'RE INSANE BUDDY !! McPhee got to Essendon 2 years ago via Fremantle. . . What makes you think he would want to go to a team that's on its way back down the ladder ??? The Dons would be crazy to give up a future Brownlow medallist. Cant wait till he hits his peak and starts tearing up the opposition (especially Port)
 
Supajimmy said:
:thumbsdown: YOU'RE INSANE BUDDY !! McPhee got to Essendon 2 years ago via Fremantle. . . What makes you think he would want to go to a team that's on its way back down the ladder ??? The Dons would be crazy to give up a future Brownlow medallist. Cant wait till he hits his peak and starts tearing up the opposition (especially Port)
Settle down champ, and re-read the thread. You'll find the "McPhee for Cochrane" suggestion was a joke. Nice first post btw, really energetic, perfect for BigFooty.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

waspy said:
Whether he is worth it or not, we will get more than that for him. Hopefully an early 2nd rounder.....there are plenty of clubs interested in him so that should drive the price up.

How about Richards plus our 4th round pick to sydney for Mcveigh? Our 4th rounder would be close to their 3rd rounder.
Would be a win win. Sydney get a tall backman with potential and a upgraded pick. Essendon get the bother of Mark whom can add more pace in the midfield. An inside player we need.
 
TeeBee said:
How about Richards plus our 4th round pick to sydney for Mcveigh? Our 4th rounder would be close to their 3rd rounder.
Would be a win win. Sydney get a tall backman with potential and a upgraded pick. Essendon get the bother of Mark whom can add more pace in the midfield. An inside player we need.

we'd be more likely to send our mcveigh north to sydney than the other way around. how about sending down o'keefe, instead?
 
waspy said:
How about Bullen + pick 55 for pick 46. Sounds like both clubs would be happy that way, Port get a bloke they say that they want and we upgrade our 4th pick to a late third rounder.

I think this will happen, as much as I don’t want Bullen at Port I think were not giving up much.
 
AirportWest #17 said:
Heard on SEN this morning.

Scott Camporeale -> Essendon
Mark Bolton -> Carlton

Thoughts?

I don't want Camporeale. But if we got rid of Bolton I'd do it in a flash.

Camporeale would have a lot more to offer us than Mark Bolton.
 
campo is finished why do we want carlton dscards they are mortal enemy no. 1. then again we are giving mark bolton to them hopefully we can do it soon then on trade campo. then we will get a win win stuff carlton up whilst not having any carlton trash. Id prefer we give richards (dont want to lose to guy) and bolton as a package do get an elite mifielder, somehow. If all the talk is about richards then its all good for us i think.
 
AirportWest #17 said:
Heard on SEN this morning.

Scott Camporeale -> Essendon
Mark Bolton -> Carlton

Thoughts?
finally, we get to poison Carlton.

Campo - enjoy the trip to Bendigo, we need a few good midfielder for Bendi next year - given the kids stepping up and the trash being moved on.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Trade possibilities??

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top