meto
Norm Smith Medallist
Schroder had 14 tackles to go with the 26 touches too. Fair effort I would have thought.
Bloody heck!....if that's not good enough you've got to ask "whatever will be"?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Schroder had 14 tackles to go with the 26 touches too. Fair effort I would have thought.
We should always drop players who kick 2 goals, get 16 possessions and use the ball at 92%DE. After a game like that we should actually break their legs.
The thing that intrigues me is that the arguments put forward are as at home with him now as they were in 2007. That is as damning about some posters (both sides of the argument) as it is about the player! People seem so slow to adjust their opinions/perspectives/expectations about players no matter how long they observe a set of facts that don't match their view. In some cases, it seems, people never adjust!There's no middle ground with Varcoe, is there?
People on either side of the argument seem to engage in almost every logical fallacy going.
And the Selective Observation each side uses seems to make it absolutely impossible to ever reach any consensus about what he actually does, let alone what he should be doing, or what the MC expects him to do.
At the end of the day, the important thing is that he continues to get a game, and there is no sign of this changing, so the whole argument really becomes moot.
There's no middle ground with Varcoe, is there?
People on either side of the argument seem to engage in almost every logical fallacy going.
And the Selective Observation each side uses seems to make it absolutely impossible to ever reach any consensus about what he actually does, let alone what he should be doing, or what the MC expects him to do.
At the end of the day, the important thing is that he continues to get a game, and there is no sign of this changing, so the whole argument really becomes moot.
By the way, despite efforts by some to describe their own view as "middle ground", the most likely moderate view of Varcoe is the one held by the people who have the most insight to the situation; the most knowledge about personalities, fitness and injury; and the most expertise.
(I'm tipping they ain't got time for BigFooty )
What does that even mean??Disagree entirely that their view is moderate. They seem him train and probably dazzle everyone. They're as biased as everyone else.
At the end of the day, the important thing is that he continues to get a game, and there is no sign of this changing, so the whole argument really becomes moot.
If Blicavs was out of the side then Varcoe can do his job on the wing running to space and avoiding contact. A job he does much better than Blicavs.
We have no way near the depth to drop the guy. Yeah it's disappointing that someone with his talent isn't an A grader but he still does enough to get a game.
Classic situation of one set of rules for one bloke and another set for everyone else. I know they're concerned about his state of mind and confidence if dropped to VFL. Ridiculous!! The guy is a professional on a big salary... It's truly bad for him, bad for club fabric and culture, not to mention team performance.
Maybe we'll turn the switch this week, bring our pressured game / intensity and he'll look good again? If not... same old shit. Downhill skier.
Wouldn't you love to get half a dozen VFL guys to have a few beers and then ask their opinions on Varcoe. Make for interesting listening.
Remember they tried their best to keep Horlin-Smith in the VFL but he's smashed the door down. Hopefully Schroder and a few others can join him.
Wouldn't you love to get half a dozen VFL guys to have a few beers and then ask their opinions on Varcoe. Make for interesting listening.
Remember they tried their best to keep Horlin-Smith in the VFL but he's smashed the door down. Hopefully Schroder and a few others can join him.
I'd keep Varcoe out of that room after they had a few, that's for sure!
Tip: use the ignore function and it gets you halfway there!So now we just take cheap pot shots at our own players on this board?
Are there any grown up cats forums on the net these days?
I've defended Varcoe for years... He's had good patches.
He has had some injuries and it takes time to get back into it after injuries. But he has had the time.
I'm done with him now. Doesn't seem to want the ball. Doesn't have any intensity. Seems lazy and completely disinterested.
We've been patiently waiting for 12mths for him to turn the so called corner CE, when is enough enough!
We're getting that soft reputation all over again, Freo know we're easy and so do others!
He's just not worthy of a senior game.
Stop the BS pal, it was 14 and none in the first quarter, the only reason he got the 14 is our guys were so under the pump they had to use the outside option all day, this also happened against Port when our dependables were under the pump.
Both goals were outside legacy of the hard work of others, especially the first which TH was making sure of rather than taking the kick himself.
But don't go artificially pumping this blokes tyres pal, there's enough BS written about him on here as it is.
The way this board is these days i might aswell just ignore the whole site.
Love to see how far and hard TV ran to get on the end of that hard work from others, even when he works hard, you'd like to say he hasn't. He's an outside player, get over it.
He's also 3rd in our team for tackles.
So in effect you want to drop our 3rd best goal kicker (offence) and 3rd best tackler (defence and pressure)...
Tip: use the ignore function and it gets you halfway there!
Lol - i do this, i go away for what feels like weeks at a time then come back and find the same negative rubbish from mostly the same people.