Tribunal owes an apology to these men

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

TheReason said:
Gardiner
Matera
Gehrig

P.S. Cloke and Rocca as well



The tribunal admitted it got it wrong in the first half of the year. Anything like Halls lately hasnt even come up. Hall was harshly dealt by to even cope a fine.

Cloke and Rocca were desperate thugs doing thuggy things. Irrelevant to Halls case.
 
TheWhiteRhino said:
Do u Eagles supporters ever stop crying?

Shouldn't you be more worried about Gaspar.
Do Sydney supporters ever stop crying? How much crying has been done over the umpiring today?
What if Hall was suspended? We wouldnt be hearing the end of it.
Its great, 1 less excuse if beat you.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Barry Schneider said:
Don't forget Darren Jolly.The most ridiculous suspension this year.
How did Hunter not get suspended for punching a bloke in the testicles?

Ray Hall's would be as bad as any I have seen earlier this year,missed the Jolly one but agree with Hunter that was a joke.
 
again the tribunal fails...

Two different rules. One for Sydney, the rest for the others. Lets just change the rules even when the season isnt over.

The pure and simple fact, he punched someone when he was nowhere near the ball. Apparently the AFL endorse this...?

Good luck to barry of the w/e but i hope someone does it back to him, might as well, apparently its legal.

Im going for the eagles.
 
section8 said:
The umpire and the tribunal have eyes everywhere. They're referred to as "television cameras".

Cameras don't always catch every bit of footage. ;) But most times it would.
Anyways hall's punch only look bad because of maguire. If maguire had of got up straight away the punch would have been seen as just a tap and hall wouldn't of had to face the tribunal. Gardiner took a full swing.
 
Pickett?? 6 weeks for an indescretion that was repeated a few times during the season, and never met with as much severity.

Mark Williams got punched in the gonads once by Hunter, and because he plays for the lovechild of the afl, hunter got away wtih it
 
What gets me is why they only discussed it for 4 minutes. Biggest decision of the year and they discuss it for only 4 minutes before clearing him.
 
licuria4life said:
Wat about Didak this year, was very stiff if Barry Hall can get off this.

How could the Didak case be ruled as in play, the ball was being taken back to the centre square. Besides that the points Hall got were exactly the same as Didak.

So moral of the story is if you are going to give someone a love tap make sure the ball is in play and that you at least considered to be in play under the current AFL rules.

DST
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Tribunal owes an apology to these men

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top