DeepThroat007
Team Captain
- Jul 1, 2006
- 391
- 0
- AFL Club
- Richmond
You have a mate?
I knew everything after that would be a lie as well.
Pissa ^
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
You have a mate?
I knew everything after that would be a lie as well.
Vickery smashed NicNat in the Under 18 Grand Final also. This kid will be a gun in time. Quickest over 20m at the draft camp that year out of everyone too, not bad for a 200cm ruckman
Vickery smashed NicNat in the Under 18 Grand Final also. This kid will be a gun in time. Quickest over 20m at the draft camp that year out of everyone too, not bad for a 200cm ruckman
Not quite, he had a good time of 2.94 seconds which was equal 12th at draft camp that year. Still a pretty quick time for a big bloke, pace and agility is certainly not a weakness.
Rhys Stanley seems to have similar abilities, though the Saints wouldn't play him in the ruck in a fit at the moment. ( We didn't use an early pick on him either ).
but you did on kosi !!
True, we could have gotten Alan Didak, but then again we could have gotten Luke Livingstone.
I wasn't picking on Vickery too much though.
As I said earlier, If you look at what Saints first round pick from the year before, Ben McEvoy, thats the level you should be expecting Vickery to be playing next year.
The only question is whether its better to "blood" your young ruckman, or let them develop in the VFL a bit longer.
I guess the Tigers were probably hoping Simmonds would last a bit longer, because you aren't really in a good positon to rest Vickery if he comes up sore or slightly injured. We've seen other young rucks ( McIntosh , Lleunberger ) have the develpment prolonged due to early injuries.
Perfect timing too, That when richmond will hopefully be a contender for the flag.Around 22, 23 he'll come good.
Around 22, 23 he'll come good.
que Jack Watts-esque criticism of a young KPP....
Vickery Round 1 Pick #8
Watts Round 1 Pick #1
difference = 7 picks
age
Watts = 19, 2 months
Vickery = 20
whats your point?
Point is your club had a chance to take, Naitanui, Stephen Hill, Michael Hurley and even Jack Ziebell who has all shown more then Watts.
Yes i know hes young and is a KPP, but the fact is he is soft and hasn't shown much in his time playing at the top level.
The Saints bid for Ayce Cordy with their first round pick.Rhys Stanley seems to have similar abilities, though the Saints wouldn't play him in the ruck in a fit at the moment. ( We didn't use an early pick on him either ).
Ok, buddy.watts has played 8 games
vickery has shown less than watts
yes all those players have shown much more than watts, tbh that doesnt concern me with watts' limited afl exposure
if next year he is still performing similarly, then i will be worried
watts has played 8 games
vickery has shown less than watts
yes all those players have shown much more than watts, tbh that doesnt concern me with watts' limited afl exposure
if next year he is still performing similarly, then i will be worried
Put a c*ck in it mate!
Your bias is getting annoying!
gb
to be honest thats what i think every time you sign off..... with gb
... he has shown less than watts,
not that watts has shown much at all, just that vickery has shown less (albeit not much less)... i am happy to be proven wrong if you can show me evidence that vickery has done more
its ironic that so many richmond supporters are willing to dish it out to other young KPPs but are prepared to grant their own much more time (not just referring to this thread) i think vickery will be a good player, and as a KPP should be given time to mature
regardless of the fact that watts was taken at no.1, vickery was at no.8 which is still a very high draft pick and needs to start performing to it (although nowhere near as much as watts does)
tpm
Vickery plays ruck... surely that is a harder position as a 1st/2nd year player than playing as a third tall??