Spot on Knuckles. Exactly what I've been saying for years.Originally posted by knuckles
Wrong. 96-97 was a legacy of the coach who was supposed to be a coach forever - Matthews. 98 was his own, and in '99 he fell on his sword the whole year by leaving more experienced, but no future, players in the seconds, and trying young players all year. If he was greedy enough, he could have mustered enough wins to finish 12-14.....nobody would have won with this finish. Shaw's support network was so bad that even MM admitted so by ONLY joining if Ed was in charge and some changes were made. Shaw had faults, and wasn't the coach you would hope for, but calling those years the Shaw years is too simplistic.
FWIW I think Shaw was better than history will judge him or has judged him. Early on he was attacking and we were doing well. When we lost he had no counter plan and lacked cattle to do anything anyway. In the end he lost all confidence and was a shell of his playing self. He was no super coach but he wasn't the worst we ever had either.