US Election

Is this the best thread ever and the other poxy international thread should be closed

  • Yes because I’m a winner

  • No because I’m a loser


Results are only viewable after voting.

Remove this Banner Ad

I imagine shit like this will stop once the adults take charge on 20 January 2025. Espionage should come with very very harsh penalties


The Secret Service allowed a drone to fly over Trumps rally a Butler without question.
Maybe just another practice run before the next attempt :think:
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

That so accurately describes every single bog-standard health bureaucrat in charge of this nation’s Covid response.

My main contention is it is not accurate to call yourself silenced while meeting with government officials like Alex Azar, being brought on board to advise Ron DeSantis, and having yourself and your ideas funded and pushed by wealthy backers.

There are people that are actually silenced but it's not the guys you see going on Joe Rogan and Fox news to complain about it.
 
Why would the Crooked Joe Biden Team need to spend so much ?

Biden spent big to fight contrary narratives; ‘misinformation’ on virus, climate​

The massive 'misinformation' effort by the Biden-Harris White House was worse than most people realize. It reached throughout the administration and cost at least $267 million.

OpenTheBooks examined spending dating back to fiscal 2017, which roughly coincides with the start of Mr. Trump’s first term in office.

Misinformation spending soared in 2021, when Mr. Biden took office, with $126 million spent — chiefly on pandemic-related projects. It has steadily dropped but totaled $18 million in the just-ended fiscal 2024.

Most of the COVID-19 spending went to Health and Human Services Department projects to boost vaccine use and other government-urged measures for racial and ethnic minorities. That includes “evidence-based interventions to address vaccine misinformation.”

HHS also authorized grants that paid for outfits to monitor social media for vaccine and other medical information contradicting the department’s preferred narratives.



 
And also they were just wrong about their claims and ideas, especially herd immunity when natural infection did not provide long lasting protection against reinfection.



The immunity generated from an infection was found to be “at least as high, if not higher” than that provided by two doses of an mRNA vaccine.

Immunity acquired from a Covid infection provides strong, lasting protection against the most severe outcomes of the illness, according to research published Thursday in The Lancet — protection, experts say, that’s on par with what’s provided through two doses of an mRNA vaccine
 


The immunity generated from an infection was found to be “at least as high, if not higher” than that provided by two doses of an mRNA vaccine.

Immunity acquired from a Covid infection provides strong, lasting protection against the most severe outcomes of the illness, according to research published Thursday in The Lancet — protection, experts say, that’s on par with what’s provided through two doses of an mRNA vaccine

Yes it provided protection, not enough for herd immunity even with vaccines, as seen by the fact that nowhere achieved herd immunity despite these people claiming it had been achieved or was just around the corner.

 
My main contention is it is not accurate to call yourself silenced while meeting with government officials like Alex Azar, being brought on board to advise Ron DeSantis, and having yourself and your ideas funded and pushed by wealthy backers.

There are people that are actually silenced but it's not the guys you see going on Joe Rogan and Fox news to complain about it.

Please. Of course they were silenced.

If those voices were cutting through, these things would’ve been addressed as they were happening. But they weren’t.

The few brave experts who were pointing out these things were dismissed, ridiculed and labelled conspiracy theorists.


The most disturbing finding from the year-long COVID inquiry released on Tuesday is that trust among the Australian community has been eroded.

It is so broken that the inquiry’s surveys, from June this year, found one in five people would not get a vaccine offered by the government in a future health emergency. Only three in 10 had high trust in the federal government to have done the right thing at the height of the pandemic.

This will be its most damaging legacy.

Transparency is another: when asking people to accept significant curbs to their freedom, finances, social lives and mental health, governments must publish their reasons and supporting advice.

Responses should also evolve according to evidence. Instead, some measures were as blunt and restrictive 18 months after their initial implementation.

The next government to face a major health crisis will inherit a difficult predicament. “Many of the measures taken during COVID‑19 are unlikely to be accepted by the population again,” the report found.
 
Yes it provided protection, not enough for herd immunity even with vaccines, as seen by the fact that nowhere achieved herd immunity despite these people claiming it had been achieved or was just around the corner.

One thing that I don't recall being reported were the mass deaths (in the context of deaths per capita of population) in places like India, Pakistan, African nations etc where there would have been no social distancing, masking (or very little) and access to vaccines was few and far between.

How could that possibly be if there was not herd immunity?

India for example has a population closing in on 2 Billion people and yet had 500K deaths - 379/million population in an overcrowded majority 3rd world country.

The states where everything was shut down, masking was everywhere, social distancing was everywhere and access to vaccines was as good as any country in the world had 3642 deaths / million people - close to 10 x the deaths per capita as India

 
If those voices were cutting through

Is your argument that they were silenced or that they weren't given enough power? I would argue they had too much power and the people that dismissed them turned out to be correct.

Obviously the pandemic could have been handled better, transparency is always good, public messaging was confusing at times, responses should be evidence based, all good. And I'm fine with people being politically against prevention measures like the lockdowns or school closures. They have negative impacts, they infringe on civil liberties. It's fine to say you're against these things.

I think you just don't get to live in a fantasy where we could have just done nothing and everything turned out to be ok, if you want to argue those measures should not have been in place you have to also accept the large number of preventable deaths that would have come with that, including deaths of children.

I'd also suggest some of the loss of confidence in government and vaccines comes from the people spreading anti-vaccine and COVID minimising information which turned out to be incorrect but many bought into. People like Bhattacharya for example.
 
I think you just don't get to live in a fantasy where we could have just done nothing and everything turned out to be ok, if you want to argue those measures should not have been in place you have to also accept the large number of preventable deaths that would have come with that, including deaths of children.

Yeah look I just can’t take this conversation seriously when you live in this sort of alternate reality.

The physical and mental health & wellbeing of children was sacrificed en masse during Covid to protect 80 year olds.

That was one of the specific points of feedback that came out of the inquiry.

And it was a point that was obvious all the way through, to anyone with two brain cells to rub together.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Yeah look I just can’t take this conversation seriously when you live in this sort of alternate reality.

The physical and mental health & wellbeing of children was sacrificed en masse during Covid to protect 80 year olds.

That was one of the specific points of feedback that came out of the inquiry.

And it was a point that was obvious all the way through, to anyone with two brain cells to rub together.

When this type of thinking was put into action however

 
When this type of thinking was put into action however


Yeah, we know how those “statistics” work.

Go to hospital with a major illness or injury. Test positive for Covid….

The reality is the number of those kids that actually died because of Covid would be close to zero.

I’m not reading that rubbish article but I bet somewhere in there it says those kids had serious illnesses.

We knew from the very beginning that this disease was less dangerous to kids than the flu. At worst on a par.

There was no reason to destroy two years of their education, mask them, lock them inside and force an experimental jab on them. None whatsoever.
 
Yeah, we know how those “statistics” work.

Go to hospital with a major illness or injury. Test positive for Covid….

The reality is the number of those kids that actually died because of Covid would be close to zero.

I’m not reading that rubbish article but I bet somewhere in there it says those kids had serious illnesses.

We knew from the very beginning that this disease was less dangerous to kids than the flu. At worst on a par.

There was no reason to destroy two years of their education, mask them, lock them inside and force an experimental jab on them. None whatsoever.
It does mention this, one of the most common underlying medical conditions being obesity. Most obese children are unlikely to pass away anytime soon unless something like COVID contributes to it. Plenty may be classified as vulnerable or with another underlying condition but this does not mean they are likely to die any time soon unless something like COVID comes along as well.

COVID is more dangerous to children than flu.


I also think it is bad for children's development when their teachers die.




Or when their parents or grandparents die from COVID.



Or when they are impacted by non-death related impacts of Covid.

 
Last edited:
How is this demented woke **** still in power.
Well, come October 2025 he'll be out on his ar$e, and in a big way, according to the polls. It is a mystery how he has survived this long, I don't know enough about Canuck politics to know how much of that is down to a poor quality opposition.
 


It went bluer?

Obviously not very good at maths.

2020 Biden 55.40% Trump 41.90% Difference 13.5%
2024 Harris 54.16% Trump 43.17% Difference 10.99%

Think a reduction of 2.51% suggests it got a bit redder, not much, but it didn’t get bluer.

More misinformation - how surprising 🤪🤪🤪.

And you accept anything without bothering to check.
 
It does mention this, one of the most common underlying medical conditions being obesity. Most obese children are unlikely to pass away anytime soon unless something like COVID contributes to it. Plenty may be classified as vulnerable or with another underlying condition but this does not mean they are likely to die any time soon unless something like COVID comes along as well.

COVID is more dangerous to children than flu.


I also think it is bad for children's development when their teachers die.




Or when their parents or grandparents die from COVID.



Or when they are impacted by non-death related impacts of Covid.

And all those children orphaned by covid 19 ☹️
 

Remove this Banner Ad

US Election

Back
Top