US Election

[1970crow]

After a long drought its been revealed the dams are empty from what I have heard.

Inexcusable. But what he is referring to is Trumps idea about water from colorado proposal. There is more chance of me riding a push bike to Australia from portugal in the time between now and Trumps previous presidency to a single pipe being laid in preperation for utilising the water.

Trump had apparently brokered a deal that just needed governor of the day signature. No doubt someone he knew would have a head start on purchasing land or other kind of rights downstream, but it sounds like it was able to get up and going.

 

[adelaidecrows]

Trump had apparently brokered a deal that just needed governor of the day signature. No doubt someone he knew would have a head start on purchasing land or other kind of rights downstream, but it sounds like it was able to get up and going.

Sure he did, but the facts dont support that it would have made a difference. Without playing politics, from what I have heard is that the fire destroyed key pipes not to mention the unprecedented demand of 3 major fires sucking water from the supply and thus it weakened the entire water system and drained the pressure. The perfect storm really. I think a lot has to be reviewed. The lack of funding from LA governments is disgraceful. The budget cuts will see heads roll and there is a lot to come out on this. I will concede Trump could end up being right. time will tell.

 

[Eagleboy2011]

No he quoted an x account telling him what to quote.
Ok to be fair he isnt a complete dribbling fool like some of his mates.

"quoted an x account telling him what to quote"

What does that even mean?

Newscum is literally lying to that distraught woman in real time. Didn't you watch the video?

He literally says to her he is talking to the president in real time.
She asks to be in on the call.
He then says he can't get onto the president, and he has tried 5 times.
Then he says he has no phone service.


How do you misunderstand that.

 

[Slippery Pete]

1. You’ve repeatedly posted debunked gibberish lauding ivermectin’s effectiveness as a treatment for COVID,

Speaking of which, I did pop my head in here the other week to see you still on the soap box wailing about ivermectin being the miracle cure for COVID.

Again, receipts? I’ve posted the exact opposite thing, dating back to 2022, to what you claimed I posted.

The issue was never that it was some miracle cure….

Nobody claimed it was a miracle cure.

Nobody including me ever said it was some proven miracle cure,

Either come up with the receipts or admit you’re a liar.

 

[Eagleboy2011]

Was Jimmy Carter a Nazi? Good question for senator Warren.

 

[Slippery Pete]

The second line of defence in the Slippery Pete ivermectin fanboi armoury has been to repeatedly reference its “Noble” [sic - ] Prize, which it won for its effectiveness as an anti-parasitic (not antiviral) drug.

You’re refuting an argument I’m not making, and never have made, because you can’t refute the actual argument.

To recap:

1. Doctors discovered early on that some of their patients got better after prescribing this drug (and others) off-label. This is not some big controversy, some people respond to treatments without significant clinical evidence. This is why doctors are able to prescribe things off-label.
2. A weapons-grade propaganda campaign by the media and the medical bureaucracy ensued to denigrate the drug (horse paste etc). This was obviously nefarious and completely unnecessary (unless you were Pfizer or AZ, then it was very necessary).
3. The TGA banned the off label prescription of the drug. You have denied this. But it is a fact.

All of this occurred for one reason and one reason only: to protect Pfizer, Moderna and AZ. There was no money to be made from off-label treatments of Covid. There were billions to be made from the heart-attack jabs.

In order to deny this is what occurred, you not only have to deny reality, but you have to defend some of the world’s most despicable creatures. Useless, pathetic politicians and bureaucrats like Brad Hazzard and Brett Sutton, and pharmaceutical megacorporations like Pfizer who made tens of billions of dollars from those jabs and never have to pay a cent for injuring and killing people.

Do pharameutical giants sometimes come up with great products that help people get better? Sure.

Should those products be mandated on people, monopolized at the expense of all other possible treatments, and given carte blanche legal immunity against injuring and killing people?

Fu*k no. Never in a million years.

This is obviously a fact, and because of your very weird compulsion to defend the world’s worst people you can’t admit it.

Sad.

 

[Eagleboy2011]

You’re refuting an argument I’m not making, and never have made, because you can’t refute the actual argument.

To recap:

1. Doctors discovered early on that some of their patients got better after prescribing this drug (and others) off-label. This is not some big controversy, some people respond to treatments without significant clinical evidence. This is why doctors are able to prescribe things off-label.
2. A weapons-grade propaganda campaign by the media and the medical bureaucracy ensued to denigrate the drug (horse paste etc). This was obviously nefarious and completely unnecessary (unless you were Pfizer or AZ, then it was very necessary).
3. The TGA banned the off label prescription of the drug. You have denied this. But it is a fact.

All of this occurred for one reason and one reason only: to protect Pfizer, Moderna and AZ. There was no money to be made from off-label treatments of Covid. There were billions to be made from the heart-attack jabs.

In order to deny this is what occurred, you not only have to deny reality, but you have to defend some of the world’s most despicable creatures. Useless, pathetic politicians and bureaucrats like Brad Hazzard and Brett Sutton, and pharmaceutical megacorporations like Pfizer who made tens of billions of dollars from those jabs and never have to pay a cent for injuring and killing people.

Do pharameutical giants sometimes come up with great products that help people get better? Sure.

Should those products be mandated on people, monopolized at the expense of all other possible treatments, and given carte blanche legal immunity against injuring and killing people?

Fu*k no. Never in a million years.

This is obviously a fact, and because of your very weird compulsion to defend the world’s worst people you can’t admit it.

Sad.

Nothing to see here.

"Mark Zuckerberg says the Biden admin called his employees and “screamed and cursed” at them to take down Covid/vaccine content. "

 

[Eagleboy2011]

Is DEI dead? How did supposed geniuses fall for this "shit" in the first place.

 

[1970crow]

No he quoted an x account telling him what to quote.
Ok to be fair he isnt a complete dribbling fool like some of his mates.

If you watch the video, what was posted was verbatim. There was no word salad. If you watch it, it’s pretty embarrassing, the governor flat out lies.