NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

[Kurve]

Here is US Politics Pt 2

The 2024 US presidential election is on Tuesday, 5 November 2024. The winner will serve a term of four years in the White House, starting in January 2025.

 

[Bostonian]

Why are we talking about that shit stain Andrews in the US politics thread?

 

[Malifice]

I bet you can't find an article stating that Andrews remained on the scene until emergency services arrived.

I don't have to find an article saying Andrews and his Wife remained on the scene after the crash, you have to find one where it claims they did not remain on the scene.

You're the one making the claim (unsupported) that it was a Hit and Run. Ergo, it's your job to prove it.

What we do know is Andrews immediately called 000 after the crash, and the police who attended the site got in trouble for failing to breathalyze the people present.

So ****ing someone was there for them to forget to breathalyze, and sure as shit if Dan Andrews wife (who was driving) had done a runner, they would have charged her with 'Failing to stop and render assistance after a crash'.

There are literally zero articles (including from Sky News) making any claims that Andrews (or his wife) did a runner.

Answer honestly, where are you getting the 'hit and run' angle from?

 

[Malifice]

Here is an article with a diagram of where the accident happened.

https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/politics/the-2013-car-crash-that-will-not-go-away-for-daniel-andrews-and-his-family/news-story/e03203fa63417c912b6727b945015726

There is no diagram in that article.

Just some cooker trying to claim that 'Andrews must have been traveling at speed, because the Kid was badly injured and the car windshield was caved in' with where he says the car was hit (it looks futher back to my eyes from the photograph, likely just in front of the right-side drivers front door pillar)

What a ****ing idiot. Even if Andrews car was at a full stop, a 100kg (rider plus bike) object hitting the side of a stationary car at 30 odd kph is going to do some serious damage to both themselves and the car.

The only way Andrews wife (who was driving) commits an offence is if she:

1. Drove off without rendering assistance (the cops would have been all over that, she was there when they got there but they failed to breathalyze her, so unless you can prove otherwise, this did not happen).
2. Cut across a bicycle lane without giving way causing the cyclist to impact the side of her car at right angles. (Possible given where the impact took place, but surely the cops would have been all over that as well)
3. She was drunk (possible, but the Cops did not breathalyze her so we'll never know).
4. She was otherwise driving recklessly or dangerously (and there is no evidence to suggest this).

What evidence do you have of her doing any of the above 4 things?

 

[Malifice]

Here is a video with a statement from the cyclists father.

Hearsay. The father was not a witness. He was not there. He's only going on (at best) what his son told him, and we already know (from the Police investigation) that the Andrews family was there, because the Cops failed to breathalyze them (and did not charge them with Failing to Render assistance, which they would have done if Andrews was stupid enough to call the cops, tell them what happened, and then do a runner anyway)

Find me some actual evidence please.

 

[zill]

I don't have to find an article saying Andrews and his Wife remained on the scene after the crash, you have to find one where it claims they did not remain on the scene.

You're the one making the claim (unsupported) that it was a Hit and Run. Ergo, it's your job to prove it.

What we do know is Andrews immediately called 000 after the crash, and the police who attended the site got in trouble for failing to breathalyze the people present.

So ****ing someone was there for them to forget to breathalyze, and sure as shit if Dan Andrews wife (who was driving) had done a runner, they would have charged her with 'Failing to stop and render assistance after a crash'.

There are literally zero articles (including from Sky News) making any claims that Andrews (or his wife) did a runner.

Answer honestly, where are you getting the 'hit and run' angle from?

I provided a video from the victims father indicating that he didn't remain on the scene.

I called it a hit and run because it was:
A hit and run occurs when a person involved in a vehicle accident leaves the scene without stopping to fulfill their legal obligations

The police went to the home they were renting to fail to breathalyse them. The officers were also not punished in any way.

 

[zill]

Why are we talking about that shit stain Andrews in the US politics thread?

Responding to claims that the Australian justice system isn't two-tier like it is in America.

 

[zill]

There is no diagram in that article.

Just some cooker trying to claim that 'Andrews must have been traveling at speed, because the Kid was badly injured and the car windshield was caved in' with where he says the car was hit (it looks futher back to my eyes from the photograph, likely just in front of the right-side drivers front door pillar)

What a ****ing idiot. Even if Andrews car was at a full stop, a 100kg (rider plus bike) object hitting the side of a stationary car at 30 odd kph is going to do some serious damage to both themselves and the car.

The only way Andrews wife (who was driving) commits an offence is if she:

1. Drove off without rendering assistance (the cops would have been all over that, she was there when they got there but they failed to breathalyze her, so unless you can prove otherwise, this did not happen).
2. Cut across a bicycle lane without giving way causing the cyclist to impact the side of her car at right angles. (Possible given where the impact took place, but surely the cops would have been all over that as well)
3. She was drunk (possible, but the Cops did not breathalyze her so we'll never know).
4. She was otherwise driving recklessly or dangerously (and there is no evidence to suggest this).

What evidence do you have of her doing any of the above 4 things?

You are such a clown. The victim didn't even have a statement taken from him by the police.

The article does have a diagram of where it occured, as well a photo of the area. As well as experts claiming it couldn't have happened as the Andrews said it did.

My claim is that the justice system here is as corrupt as the US system, you are arguing that because they weren't found at fault, all is good. I am claiming corruption. The police recording Andrews wife under her maiden name is also dodgy as **** and no reason it should have occured except as part of a cover up.

 

[Balls In]

The whining over Trumps picks is laughable. When will the democrats and their media understand they are irrelevant? Trump said exactly what he intended, that's what people wanted and that's what he's doing.