- Dec 27, 2016
- 29,503
- 62,010
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Moderator
- #99
Here is US Politics Pt 2
-
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
-
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Round SF Winner: And_ROOS
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3
- Thread starter Werewolf
- Start date
- Tagged users None
The days when he was Democrat Don.
Epstein, Weinstein, Diddy.
Democrats donors each and every one.
- Moderator
- #477
Yes, because it had all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation.
When they found out the laptop actually existed (and it wasnt Kremlin disinfo), the ban by Meta etc was lifted.
What do you think this 'proves' exactly, other than the existence of Russian disinformation?
- Oct 21, 2011
- 2,156
- 8,192
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
You can't seem to put 2 and 2 together, somehow.
"Russian disinformation" was a nebulous threat, put out there by the FBI, and used to censor a story in the lead up to the election.
What this "proves", is that claims of russian disinformation are very likely to be BS, not the existence of it.
Kamala too scared to debate on Fox.
Coward.
Coward.
- Moderator
- #482
So you're saying this is not true:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_disinformation
Read that entire article, and tell me 'There is no Russian disinformation' again.
36,000 bots on Twitter spreading disinformation (some of which have been shared on here, by you cookers). Over 100 million exposed to Russian disinfo, on Facebook, alone.
Keep spruiking whatever the Russians are telling you, and keep on deflecting for them all you want, but their campaigns are real, you've been exposed to them, and they've altered the way you think and what you believe.
Just let her go around the country taking to Oprah and her other Hollywood pals.
We really want to know what your plan is to lower the cost of living?
Kamala: Yeah. First of all thank you both for being here. And your is a story I hear around the country as I travel and in terms of both rightly having the right to have aspirations and dreams and ambitions for your family and working hard and finding that the American dream is for this generation and for so many recently far more elusive than it's been.
- Oct 21, 2011
- 2,156
- 8,192
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
How much kool-aid did you drink? 4 years ago the FBI put out a vague "Russian disinformation " threat alert that led to a legit story being censored. The fact you are still here simping for the man shows how cooked you are. Why should anyone trust claims of "Russian disinformation " after that?
- Moderator
- #485
Yes, I know. Because the story in question had all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation.
When proof came out the story was real, Meta lifted the ban.
The story got caught up in tens of thousands (millions including reposts and shares etc) of fake stories put onto Meta (and other social media and 'alt news' sites) by the Russians.
What do you think this proves exactly?
WikiMal gets it wrong again.
FBI authenticated Hunter's laptop was his and the contents were verified in December 2019 around 10 months before the election. The timing is also confirmed in Court documents from when Hunter sued the Computer shop owner.
It was not Russian Disinformation or had the "hallmarks of Russian Disinformation".
Even as Twitter and Facebook, in collusion with the FBI, censored the Post and the mainstream media collectively looked the other way, the Biden campaign knew that the sheer weight of the evidence would eventually be impossible to ignore.
Blinken’s solution was to set in motion one of the most brazen dirty tricks in US electoral history. Using the intelligence community to sound the false alarm of “Russian disinformation,” ground already prepared by corrupt elements inside the FBI, he set out to discredit the whole laptop story.
A phony call away
First, he phoned CIA veteran Mike Morell for advice on combating The Post’s reporting. Morell, 62, was thrilled the campaign was asking him for help. After more than 30 years of loyal service to the CIA, he’d never made it to the top. He’d come close — serving as acting director twice.The boyish, bespectacled, Ohio-born son of an autoworker and a homemaker quit the CIA in 2013 after being passed over for the top job. But he hadn’t given up hope of fulfilling his life’s ambition. When he got a call from Blinken, he saw his chance, at last, to be CIA director in a Biden administration.
Morell could not have been more eager to please. He would later testify to Congress that Blinken’s phone call prompted him to organize 50 intelligence colleagues to sign a letter falsely insinuating that the damning material from Hunter's laptop published by The Post was Russian disinformation.
The Dirty 51 letter, as it came to be known, was timed to appear on the eve of the final presidential debate, to maximize its benefit to Joe, by giving him a “talking point to push back on [President] Trump on this issue,” as Morell put it.
Blinken followed up his call a few hours later, emailing Morell a new, anonymously sourced, thinly reported — but conveniently timed — USA Today article claiming that the FBI was examining whether Hunter’s laptop was part of a “smoke bomb of disinformation pushed by Russia” to damage Biden.
At the bottom of Blinken’s email was the signature block of Andrew Bates, the Biden campaign’s director of rapid response. The Biden campaign was orchestrating the Dirty 51 letter. This was the real disinformation operation — 51 of the most powerful people in the intelligence world were uniting to deceive the American people and help Joe win the 2020 election.
How a circle of spies, Blinken covered up Biden scandals: Miranda Devine’s new book exclusive
Miranda Devine, who exposed many of Hunter’s secrets in her book “Laptop from Hell,” returns with “The Big Guy,” the story of how the FBI, the CIA, the State Department, the IRS and the DOJ conspir…
nypost.com
Kamala and Obama as well.
I think Obama is the only one powerful enough to give the go for this takedown. I'm not even sure how strong the case is, until they get alleged underage victims or how many other perps there are in the entertainment industry.
The FBI had that laptop for 12 months before that bullshit misinformation letter and the 10,000 touch points within it including dates, times, people and all associated transactions tgat prove its Hunter Biden's. Every touchpoint checks out because it's his. The deep state "former intelligence" spooks intervened in an election end of.WikiMal gets it wrong again.
FBI authenticated Hunter's laptop was his and the contents were verified in December 2019 around 10 months before the election. The timing is also confirmed in Court documents from when Hunter sued the Computer shop owner.
It was not Russian Disinformation or had the "hallmarks of Russian Disinformation".
Even as Twitter and Facebook, in collusion with the FBI, censored the Post and the mainstream media collectively looked the other way, the Biden campaign knew that the sheer weight of the evidence would eventually be impossible to ignore.
Blinken’s solution was to set in motion one of the most brazen dirty tricks in US electoral history. Using the intelligence community to sound the false alarm of “Russian disinformation,” ground already prepared by corrupt elements inside the FBI, he set out to discredit the whole laptop story.
A phony call away
First, he phoned CIA veteran Mike Morell for advice on combating The Post’s reporting. Morell, 62, was thrilled the campaign was asking him for help. After more than 30 years of loyal service to the CIA, he’d never made it to the top. He’d come close — serving as acting director twice.
The boyish, bespectacled, Ohio-born son of an autoworker and a homemaker quit the CIA in 2013 after being passed over for the top job. But he hadn’t given up hope of fulfilling his life’s ambition. When he got a call from Blinken, he saw his chance, at last, to be CIA director in a Biden administration.
Morell could not have been more eager to please. He would later testify to Congress that Blinken’s phone call prompted him to organize 50 intelligence colleagues to sign a letter falsely insinuating that the damning material from Hunter's laptop published by The Post was Russian disinformation.
The Dirty 51 letter, as it came to be known, was timed to appear on the eve of the final presidential debate, to maximize its benefit to Joe, by giving him a “talking point to push back on [President] Trump on this issue,” as Morell put it.
Blinken followed up his call a few hours later, emailing Morell a new, anonymously sourced, thinly reported — but conveniently timed — USA Today article claiming that the FBI was examining whether Hunter’s laptop was part of a “smoke bomb of disinformation pushed by Russia” to damage Biden.
At the bottom of Blinken’s email was the signature block of Andrew Bates, the Biden campaign’s director of rapid response. The Biden campaign was orchestrating the Dirty 51 letter. This was the real disinformation operation — 51 of the most powerful people in the intelligence world were uniting to deceive the American people and help Joe win the 2020 election.
How a circle of spies, Blinken covered up Biden scandals: Miranda Devine’s new book exclusive
Miranda Devine, who exposed many of Hunter’s secrets in her book “Laptop from Hell,” returns with “The Big Guy,” the story of how the FBI, the CIA, the State Department, the IRS and the DOJ conspir…
Last edited:
- Oct 20, 2014
- 18,965
- 20,332
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
I don’t care as long as it comes out. We still haven’t seen shit from Epstein Island.
- Moderator
- #490
Oh, so 10 months before the election, the FBI had verified there was nothing on the laptop?
So why the **** would Joe Biden want to cover it up then? It was a non-Government laptop, with zero incriminating contents on it for Biden (less so for his son Huner), that got lost years before the election and was verified to contain nothing 10 months before the election.
Not the sort of thing that the American public are going to care one iota about.
Learn to read.
I never said it was Russian disinformation (although a significant number of the tens of thousands of tweets, posts, likes and stories about it are Russian disinfo, or spread by Russian bots).
The laptop existed. The story however had all the hallmarks of Russian disinfo, and was trending in the same cooker spaces (and was being parrotted by the same cookers and the bots they follow) as Russian disinfo.
It proves nothing other than Russian disinformation. There is nothing on the ****ing computer. It's a non story.
- Oct 20, 2014
- 18,965
- 20,332
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
Maybe, but we’ll probably never ever know.
Go for it.
Couldn't give a ****.
It's good for everyone to see though how pointing out all these horrid shitlords were Democrat donors has triggered you.
You're more worried about the Democrats name being linked to all these people than what they actually did.
Telling.
- Dec 27, 2016
- 29,503
- 62,010
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Moderator
- #494
STAY ON TOPIC.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Trump too scared to debate on Fox as well - unless its moderated by his cheering section of course
Really struggles when removed from his echo chamber and he knows it.
Yep. And Trump's DoJ did not a single thing with it during those 10 to 12 months.
Weird isn't it, considering all the obvious evidence of corruption that you guys still think was on there
That's not what I said and another strawman argument and part of your denial process.
Wow only in the space of a few sentences you say "Learn to read. I never said it was Russian disinformation". Then two sentences later, "It proves nothing other than Russian disinformation."
It was not Russian Disinformation or had the "hallmarks of Russian Disinformation", it was a brazen Biden, Blinken, Morell, dirty trick campaign to influence the 2020 election as shown by access to documents, emails and congressional hearings.
