NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

[Kurve]

Here is US Politics Pt 2

The 2024 US presidential election is on Tuesday, 5 November 2024. The winner will serve a term of four years in the White House, starting in January 2025.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Hmm. Suspicious lack of dates in that 'article' (lol) regarding when the investigations kicked off.

I guess including them may have dented its central contention that they were purely in 'retribution' for supporting Trump.

Nothing about the timing of either investigation dents that contention.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Born in 1973, started working at White House in 1995.

Massive power imbalance, sure. But she wasn’t a minor.

Started working at the White House in June 1995 which means she was 21.

 

[zill]

Compared to whom?

Tibet

 

[Malifice]

Tibet

Tibet is part of China.

If you're asserting Chinas annexation of Tibet makes them 'warlike', then what about the Americans annexation of northern Mexico, Hawaii, the Philippines (given back), all of the Western half of North America (from various Native American States) and so forth.

And don't get me started on British annexations and colonization's. They snaffled up close to half the globe (including bits of China).

Be objective about China mate. Unlike the USA and European powers, they're not about to invade and blow up anyone else any time soon.

I'm no fan of the Chinese State (and you know my views on both illiberal dictatorships, and on Socialism, both of which I despise) but China are not the bogey men people make them out to be.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Compared to whom?

The USA? The UK? Germany? Spain? Japan? Russia? The French?

They've been around in one form or another for 4,000 odd years and its been virtually all about internal issues and repelling invasions by European and Asian aggressors (the British, the Portuguese, the Mongols, the Japanese) for that entire period.

Here is the worlds per capita military spending:

View attachment 2168608

Find China in the above list.

As a hint, they're not on there because they spend 207 dollars per person on their military.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1470098/china-military-expenditure-per-capita/

We're 8th on the list per capita (and 13th on the list of total military expenditure). Would you consider Australia 'militant'?

Before you answer, consider we've deployed troops overseas in pretty much every war of the past 125 years.

China are not about to invade anyone (barring Taiwan, and again, that's a largely internal issue).

Im no fan of the Chinese government, but you're making them out to be some kind of threat that they're not.

I don't think many place much confidence in the Chinese government released figures. Many studies have given higher estimates of their actual spend.

 

[Malifice]

I don't think many place much confidence in the Chinese government released figures. Many studies have given higher estimates of their actual spend.

The estimates are not that wildly different to the offical numbers:

Unofficial estimates place the total amount of military spending for China higher than the Chinese government figures, but these calculations tend to differ between organizations.

The last year that many international institutes provided estimates of Chinese military spending in comparable terms was 2003.[citation needed] In terms of the prevailing exchange rate, SIPRI, RAND, the CIA and the DIA estimated the budget to be between US$30–65 billion. In terms of purchasing power parity, or the relative purchasing strength of the expenditure, the SIPRI estimate was as high as US$140 billion.[14] The Chinese government's published budget at that time was less than US$25 billion.

A RAND Corporation study for year 2003 estimated China's defense spending to be higher than the official number but lower than United States Department of Defense calculations. The defense spending of China was estimated, in the mid-range estimate, to be 38 billion dollars or 2.3% of China's GDP in 2003. The official figure was 22.4 billion dollars. Nevertheless, Chinese military spending doubled between 1997 and 2003, nearly reaching the level of the United Kingdom and Japan, and it continued to grow over 10% annually during 2003–2005.[15]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milit...tockholm International,2024 at US$471 billion.

They're certainly modernizing and pushing forward with a 'Blue Water' Navy, but on a per capita basis (or as a percentage of GDP) it's not a crazy amount (particularly in light of the fact their main threat is from the USA, the most warlike nation in existence currently).

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

The estimates are not that wildly different to the offical numbers:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_budget_of_China#:~:text=In 2022, the Stockholm International,2024 at US$471 billion.

They're certainly modernizing and pushing forward with a 'Blue Water' Navy, but on a per capita basis (or as a percentage of GDP) it's not a crazy amount (particularly in light of the fact their main threat is from the USA, the most warlike nation in existence currently).

Good point about their navy. They traditionally haven't spent much there in comparative terms, having the world's longest land border and only 39% of their border being coastline.

 

[zill]

Tibet is part of China.

Spoken like a true CCP stooge.

If you're getting 50c per post, it would be more financially advantageous to you to split your posts up, instead of the wall of text multiquote jobs you churn out.

 

[bourbons]

When multiple members of your own family can't support you what does that say?

More family members of VP Pick Tim Walz show support for Donald Trump

A widely circulated leaked photo shows eight of Governor Walz's distant cousins wearing "Walz for Trump" T-shirts.

www.newsweek.com

rofl

Tim Walz's Sister Doesn't Recognize People in Viral 'Nebraska Walz's for Trump' Photo: 'We Don't Know Them'

Tim Walz's sister Sandy Dietrich has said she does not recognize the people in the now-viral "Nebraska Walz's for Trump" photo shared by former President Donald Trump

people.com

"Family"

 

[bourbons]

Nothing about the timing of either investigation dents that contention.

 

[bourbons]

Nah, Trump has nothing to do with Project 2025, doesn't even know who they are lol

The FCC is an independent agency that is overseen by Congress, but Trump has suggested he wanted to bring it under tighter White House control, in part to use the agency to punish TV networks that cover him in a way he doesn’t like.

Carr has of late embraced Trump’s ideas about social media and tech. Carr wrote a section devoted to the FCC in “ Project 2025,” a sweeping blueprint for gutting the federal workforce and dismantling federal agencies in a second Trump administration produced by the conservative Heritage Foundation.

Trump names Brendan Carr, senior GOP leader at FCC, to lead the agency

Carr is a longtime member of the commission and served previously as the FCC’s general counsel.

apnews.com

 

[Bostonian]

There's some decent CCP bootlicking going on here.

He's definitely voted Labor in his voting history.

 

[bourbons]

There's some decent CCP bootlicking going on here.

He's definitely voted Labor in his voting history.

You guys are so allergic to facts, its hilarious.

Here's some info about Stokey's ridiculous claim that you can steal under $1k worth of stuff in the US and face no consequences at all = OHMYGOD yOu pUt CriMiNalS aBoVE cITiZenS aNd SupPPorT sTeALinG!!!1

Here's some info about China = OHMYGOD CCP BoOtLiCKeR cOnFiRmeD!!1

Shrill, hysterical and deranged stuff

 

[Mofra]

"Pro-life" should rebrand as "pro-death".

Analysis Suggests 2021 Texas Abortion Ban Resulted in Increase in Infant Deaths in State in Year After Law Went into Effect | Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Researchers use statistical modeling to estimate infant deaths expected if one of the country’s most stringent state abortion laws had not been enacted.

publichealth.jhu.edu

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

rofl

Tim Walz's Sister Doesn't Recognize People in Viral 'Nebraska Walz's for Trump' Photo: 'We Don't Know Them'

Tim Walz's sister Sandy Dietrich has said she does not recognize the people in the now-viral "Nebraska Walz's for Trump" photo shared by former President Donald Trump

people.com

"Family"

The main point about posting that article wasn't focused on the people in the photo who are related through Walz's grandfather but the unearthed Facebook comments from Walz's older brother. Did you not see that part? You might note that the publishing date for my Newsweek article is later than your People magazine ( ) article. When the Newsweek article was published it was old news that the people pictured in the photo weren't close relatives. The subheading even says distant cousins. Walz's brother though should be a close enough family member for you.

Jeff Walz, Tim Walz's older brother, has made a series of public comments that further highlighted the family divide. Jeff, a resident of Florida, posted on Facebook that he is "100% opposed" to his brother's political views. "Not the type of character you want making decisions about your future," Jeff Walz wrote, referring to his brother.

 

[bourbons]

The main point about posting that article wasn't focused on the people in the photo who are related through Walz's grandfather but the unearthed Facebook comments from Walz's older brother. Did you not see that part? You might note that the publishing date for my Newsweek article is later than your People magazine ( ) article. When the Newsweek article was published it was old news that the people pictured in the photo weren't close relatives. The subheading even says distant cousins. Walz's brother though should be a close enough family member for you.

Ha, nice try

When multiple members of your own family can't support you what does that say?

So no, as confirmed by your own post, the main point of the original article was most definitely a large group of Walz's "family" members are supporting Trump, and you fell for it. 1 brother is clearly not "multiple members".

Its ok, it happens. You can acknowledge when you get something wrong, its fine. I just did it regarding my misreading of a graphic.

 

[EasternTiger]

There's some decent CCP bootlicking going on here.

He's definitely voted Labor in his voting history.

Our resident lawyer has openly admitted to voting One Nation.

We have a real cross section of people here from many many different professions, ideologies, made up work history, and several lunatic asylums.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Ha, nice try



So no, as confirmed by your own post, the main point of the original article was most definitely a large group of Walz's "family" members are supporting Trump, and you fell for it. 1 brother is clearly not "multiple members".

Its ok, it happens. You can acknowledge when you get something wrong, its fine. I just did it regarding my misreading of a graphic.

You've misunderstood me. Hopefully unintentionally.

I wasn't talking about why Newsweek published the article but why I posted it. It was the only article I came across that while featuring the picture of his cousins, talked about his brother's Facebook comments. That was my focus because I knew if I posted just the picture itself (which I had seen in numerous Twitter posts) I would get feedback precisely such as you have given. Give me some credit, seriously.