NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

How long before Musk & Trump have a major rift?

  • Under one month

  • Under six months

  • Under one year

  • Under two years

  • Not happening, never!

  • Not until Musk is ready to seize the Presidency


Results are only viewable after voting.

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is US Politics Pt 2

Donald Trump was sworn in as president of the United States on Monday 20th January, 2025 in Washington DC.

Take Note

Anti-trans commentary will be deleted and warnings issued, that includes mockery and trying to pass it off as a joke.

Play nice, please.
 
Last edited:
Ari, no such thing as containment lines when strong winds can carry embers like fireballs for kilometres.

Agreed. There's some very confusing and conflicting info on just how far though.

“Winds to this degree can easily carry embers a mile downwind, which means they can drop into vegetation and spark a new fire away from where fire resources are in place fighting, ” Margaret Stewart, Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) public information officer, told NewsNation on Wednesday.

Whereas UNSW says embers can travel up to 20km and Vic Emergency says 40.


 
Have you ever lived in the country? Had to rely on the land for a living and know how to maintain it? Im guessing not.
It is you who has zero idea but that has always been obvious.

Lmao. I’m sure you have a great view of Australia from your window in the UK.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I do think its rather ironic that I have a signature bet on me wanting a war to end and another user wanting/expecting a war to continue
Umm you appear to have forgotten what the bet was about.

It is in regards to Trump deporting people - you have him to do 7 million, I have him to do 1 million. Closest gets to write the other's sig for a month, and you'll apparently give me $100 to boot.

Not that I'm expecting any of that to actually happen when I win of course. If history is any guide, Trump could deport less than Biden did and you'll be all like "its kind of what I said would happen" :tearsofjoy:

I think its a good summary of where we all stand
Yes mate.

As we've just confirmed, if there is anyone qualified to give a good summary of where we all stand, its definitely you :tearsofjoy:
 
Agreed. There's some very confusing and conflicting info on just how far though.



Whereas UNSW says embers can travel up to 20km and Vic Emergency says 40.



As the fireball flies or road kilometres?

If a high wind pushes an ember on the mountain down to Malibu and it lands on someone's roof or in a tree that's overhanging the house for example, it might only have to travel 8kms, through the air.
 
As the fireball flies or road kilometres?

If a high wind pushes an ember on the mountain down to Malibu and it lands on someone's roof or in a tree that's overhanging the house for example, it might only have to travel 8kms, through the air.

None of them stipulate. I read a comment on a firefighters forum that they travel further in a "plume dominated fire than wind driven. Its also going to depend on fuel type, you need something light enough to get airborne, but with enough mass to burn for a long time. Pinecones are great."

Another comment from another firefighter "in Eastern New Mexico, think scrubby grassland with 25mph winds on a calm day. The farthest I have seen an spot fire that was caused for sure by an ember was about 100 yards. Then again, we saw a rabbit(yes, a rabbit) spread the fire about 250 yards before it finally succumbed to the flames.

The crazy thing about extreme winds in my experience, is the harder the wind is blowing, the less likely it is to get a spot fire. In my limited(50-60 fires), with winds over 40 knots(about 48 mph IRC), the fire just stays hugging the ground, and outruns any embers that could cause a spot fire. I was also in a very flat area so mileage may vary."
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Agreed. There's some very confusing and conflicting info on just how far though.



Whereas UNSW says embers can travel up to 20km and Vic Emergency says 40.



It's almost entirely incomprehensible to me that I'm reading 1000+ homeowners impacted recently had their insurance cancelled, signalling a real risk and that strong counter measures etc don't appear to have been taken.
 
None of them stipulate. I read a comment on a firefighters forum that they travel further in a "plume dominated fire than wind driven. Its also going to depend on fuel type, you need something light enough to get airborne, but with enough mass to burn for a long time. Pinecones are great."

Another comment from another firefighter "in Eastern New Mexico, think scrubby grassland with 25mph winds on a calm day. The farthest I have seen an spot fire that was caused for sure by an ember was about 100 yards. Then again, we saw a rabbit(yes, a rabbit) spread the fire about 250 yards before it finally succumbed to the flames.

The crazy thing about extreme winds in my experience, is the harder the wind is blowing, the less likely it is to get a spot fire. In my limited(50-60 fires), with winds over 40 knots(about 48 mph IRC), the fire just stays hugging the ground, and outruns any embers that could cause a spot fire. I was also in a very flat area so mileage may vary."

There are also some birds that spread fire. Firehawk for example.
 
None of them stipulate. I read a comment on a firefighters forum that they travel further in a "plume dominated fire than wind driven. Its also going to depend on fuel type, you need something light enough to get airborne, but with enough mass to burn for a long time. Pinecones are great."

Another comment from another firefighter "in Eastern New Mexico, think scrubby grassland with 25mph winds on a calm day. The farthest I have seen an spot fire that was caused for sure by an ember was about 100 yards. Then again, we saw a rabbit(yes, a rabbit) spread the fire about 250 yards before it finally succumbed to the flames.

The crazy thing about extreme winds in my experience, is the harder the wind is blowing, the less likely it is to get a spot fire. In my limited(50-60 fires), with winds over 40 knots(about 48 mph IRC), the fire just stays hugging the ground, and outruns any embers that could cause a spot fire. I was also in a very flat area so mileage may vary."

Some seem to think the forests shouldn't be touched because of the wildlife but it's the wildlife that suffers most through fires.

Clearing makes sense, wildlife will build their houses with what they find.

I've watched fire go over a mountain, eucalypts explode at the top then the wind picks a ball of it up and carries it to the top of another one a km away, which then explodes and on it goes.
 
I haven't seen Swift trying to meddle to the extent of Musk, for example.

No idea what you are on about with Soros. I honestly thought you guys had flipped on the Jewish conspiracies once you realised that Israel was a fascist apartheid state and that Trump/Musk supported them.
The Zionists don’t speak for the Jews who have no voice.
 
As the fireball flies or road kilometres?

If a high wind pushes an ember on the mountain down to Malibu and it lands on someone's roof or in a tree that's overhanging the house for example, it might only have to travel 8kms, through the air.
IIRC That's how fire conditions are often measured in Australia - by how far embers travel ahead of the fire front.
The black Saturday bushfires had embers travelling kilometers ahead of the front over and above the rating for catastrophic.
The 8km you mentioned earlier is likely to be well within the range of these disastrous fires in LA.

And yes, the 'whiplash' effect does make conditions harder to combat: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0ewe4p9128o

"It's clear from the devastation caused by the current wildfires in LA that rapid changes in the volatility of precipitation and evaporation can have a large impact," said Prof Sir Brian Hoskins, Chair of the Grantham Institute for Climate Change at Imperial College London.

"It's also interesting to see the paper's findings that climate models likely under-estimate the changes seen so far, but even those models suggest a doubling of the volatility for a global temperature warming of 3C – now looking increasingly likely we'll reach."

The new study adds to the growing body of evidence that a warmer climate has altered the background conditions to the raging wildfires currently burning around Los Angeles.

Much of the Western US including California experienced a decades-long drought that ended just two years ago.

The resulting wet conditions since then have seen the rapid growth of shrubs, grasses and trees, the perfect fuel for fires.

However, last summer was very hot and was followed by dry autumn and winter season with almost no rain - downtown Los Angeles has only received 0.16 inches of rain since October, more than four inches below average.

Researchers believe that a warming world is increasing the conditions that are conducive to wildland fire, including low relative humidity.
 
I did?

Well, don't keep us in suspense - of all your insane predictions I've bookmarked or taken note of over the journey, you have to have gotten 1 of them right once? Surely? :tearsofjoy:
That Hunter wouldn’t be pardoned by Sleepy Joe. You’re either lying that you didn’t know what I was referring to or you post so much crap that you don’t even believe it!
 
It's almost entirely incomprehensible to me that I'm reading 1000+ homeowners impacted recently had their insurance cancelled, signalling a real risk and that strong counter measures etc don't appear to have been taken.
It probably suggests that the insurance companies knew what was coming either because this whole disaster was planned or they knew the proper fire prevention procedures weren’t being followed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top