Kurve
Moderator
- Dec 27, 2016
- 32,695
- 66,381
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
-
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 2
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Round 1 Winner: dreamkillers
NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 4
- Thread starter Werewolf
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Once again I have no ****ing idea what you're talking about but yes, please go ahead
Keep going and I'll PM everybody the proof if you like.
Who is 'everybody' by the way? Is everybody in the room with you right now?
That’s fine. If it’s a conflict of interest I agree he shouldn’t be involved but now do Elon.
Jbudds04v2
Debutant
- Dec 7, 2023
- 102
- 151
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
You can have a conflict of interest, it just needs to be managed. And managed in an independent way. For example, Elon managing his own conflicts of interest is in itself a conflict of interest.
So I thought I would give AI an opportunity to look at this based on what Laura has pointed out.
The claim of a conflict of interest here hinges on whether Judge James Boasberg’s ruling is improperly influenced by his daughter's work at Partners For Justice (PFJ).
Key Considerations in Conflict of Interest Analysis:
- Direct vs. Indirect Conflict:
- A direct conflict would exist if Judge Boasberg had a personal stake in the case’s outcome (e.g., financial gain, personal involvement).
- An indirect conflict could arise if his daughter's work at PFJ had a clear connection to the case he ruled on, but only if her employer (PFJ) was a party or had an explicit role in the litigation.
- Does PFJ Represent the Parties in the Case?
- If Partners For Justice (PFJ) was involved in the litigation before Judge Boasberg (e.g., representing or advocating for the deportees), that would create at least an appearance of a conflict.
- If PFJ has no direct involvement in the case and his daughter merely works there, that does not meet the threshold for conflict of interest under judicial ethics standards.
- Judicial Code of Conduct:
- The Code of Conduct for United States Judges (Canon 3C) states a judge should disqualify themselves if their impartiality might reasonably be questioned due to a close relative’s direct interest in a case.
- However, a judge is not automatically required to recuse because a family member works at an organization that is not directly involved in the case.
- Katharine Boasberg’s Social Media Deletion:
- The deletion of social media accounts may suggest an attempt to avoid scrutiny, but it does not in itself prove a conflict of interest or any wrongdoing by the judge.
- Without more evidence linking her work at PFJ to this specific case, her employment is not enough to justify claims of bias.
Conclusion:
Based on the information provided, there is no clear-cut conflict of interest unless:
- PFJ was involved in the case before Judge Boasberg.
- Katharine Boasberg had a direct role in advocacy related to the specific ruling.
A motion for recusal could be filed, but it is unlikely to succeed unless stronger evidence emerges. The standard for recusal is whether a reasonable person would believe the judge's impartiality is compromised. Simply having a daughter working at a legal nonprofit is generally not enough under judicial ethics rules.
MAGA gearing up for TRUMP 2028.
Plan B is the great man will be veep to Vance.
Plan A will make your head explode.
Plan B is the great man will be veep to Vance.
Plan A will make your head explode.
DOGE - Estimated Savings so far. $115B
Please come to Australia.
Please come to Australia.
It's a long process to be a Federal judge. No way should Musk hear that matter.
- Mar 19, 2020
- 18,460
- 49,120
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Dems have been looking for a song since the election to compete with Donald Trumps YMCA and they finnaly found it
My point is you are accusing someone of conflict of interest but somehow Musk being involved in finances or red tape to do with his business isn’t.
- Mar 19, 2020
- 18,460
- 49,120
- AFL Club
- West Coast
They are all involed in conflicts of interest. Its your lot who are pretending that Obama appointed judges have no conflicts of interest...
Just call it out for what it is instead of passing the buck man. It’s alright to admit there’s issues in it while also still supporting Musk.
- Mar 19, 2020
- 18,460
- 49,120
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Everyone admits it? Who doesnt think Musk is having fun running DOGE and the like?
I can find many people saying Obama appointed judges are only doing whats right by America and have zero alignment to the Democrat party though... They can admit its a biased agenda controlling them and not their brave decisions....
Having fun? I’m talking about the clear conflict of interest his involvement is. If you’re gonna call out others, look in your own backyard first.
- Mar 19, 2020
- 18,460
- 49,120
- AFL Club
- West Coast
He has a conflict of interest... Heck the entire point of politics is a conflict of interest. Nancy Peolosis stock portfolio can show that
Its just at what level is that conflict and the meaning behind it
Is the guy tanking his net worth the bad guy?.... or is the lady whose built up a 250 million dollar stock portfolio from a senator job the person most likely to be the bad guy here?
Musk isn't a federal judge so what is his relevance to the case.
But
If you haven't noticed the entire US system of law and governance is one big conflict of interest. Federal judges are appointed along party lines, contracts are given to mates, relatives, donors etc sometimes for things that don't exist, there are trillions of dollars that can't be traced or accounted for (not necessarily stolen). There are billion dollar businesses being run out of post boxes. There are hidden files and cover ups of murder, pedophilia, topics that can't be named on this forum, that will never be released to the public or acted upon. Wars are started based on lies, for the benefit of those mates, relatives, donors etc. People are being pardoned just in case they get caught for something they did or didn't do. People on politicians wages are walking away as multi millionaires. The list is endless and all this has been going on for years.
But lets all cry democracy is dead and conflict of interest.
A. doesn't exist and
B. is the entire system
Australia is slightly less than the US but not by much.
End rant.
I agree. I’m with AOC. Politicians shouldn’t be able to trade on the stock market.
Because the complaint is about people with conflict of interest. You can’t be ok with it one aspect but be up in arms with another.
magpie_marty
Norm Smith Medallist
- Apr 30, 2017
- 7,519
- 8,984
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Wow I can finally semi agree with you regarding Judges appointed via an administration in charge,
Whats more corrupt tho the Supreme Court?
Apparently Amy Barret is a traitor ?
Wish I knew how Australia works in regards to appointing Judges perhaps you could inform us if you get time.
And last but not least should a sitting President have full immunity if any crimes are committed?
Last edited:
As you were then. My reading of this was about a judge with a COI. The person you mentioned has no relevance to that judge or ruling in any way whatsoever.
- Mar 19, 2020
- 18,460
- 49,120
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Australia is hilariously corrupt.
Westerrn Australia actually has the longest divorce settlement on record of 23 years and counting. Its at a point where they now have to fly in a judge from Queensland to make a decision because basically all the other judges keep getting paid off by lawyers and simply wont make a final decision. Lawyer fees in the 3+ mill range over 23 years. The W.A govt knows for fact the lawyers are paying off the judges but they dont/cant do anything about it because well you cant sack the entire judicial arm all at once which is what you would need to do...
I know of cases where a woman was told that she needs to "get over it" when it comes to domesrtic violence and then ruled in favour of the husband, a man who was not only convicted of domestic violence but also convicted of attacking a nurse in hospital....
Corrupt judges knows no borders im afraid
magpie_marty
Norm Smith Medallist
- Apr 30, 2017
- 7,519
- 8,984
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Thanks for your reply sir,
Just wondering should a president or a Prime Minster have total immunity?
- Mar 19, 2020
- 18,460
- 49,120
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Depends on the system. In US yes, in Australia no
US kind of lost the right to talk about immunity when they gave the right to Presidents to pardon people from any future crime they choose to commit
Stokey
Norm Smith Medallist
- Dec 20, 2021
- 8,081
- 21,205
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Arsenal
Lol at you trying to pretend it doesn't trigger you.From the bloke with a dancing Trump avatar
Stokey delivers again, absolute ****ing gold old son
But then again what doesn't.
Stokey
Norm Smith Medallist
- Dec 20, 2021
- 8,081
- 21,205
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Arsenal
Stokey
Norm Smith Medallist
- Dec 20, 2021
- 8,081
- 21,205
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Arsenal
AOC probably thinks the stock market is about trading cows and she's against it because cows fart too much.
- Mar 19, 2020
- 18,460
- 49,120
- AFL Club
- West Coast
