VAFA D1 new thread for 2007

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
He also played footy in the Diamond Valley before Euroa and actually attended Parade College which is most disappointing. Can we now get the thread back to good footy chat. Thanks to those who have offered their support, I really appreciate it. Lets have some good lively football debate and not personal comments or ridiculous accusations in regards to teams commitees.
Disappointing about what?
 
He also played footy in the Diamond Valley before Euroa and actually attended Parade College which is most disappointing. Can we now get the thread back to good footy chat. Thanks to those who have offered their support, I really appreciate it. Lets have some good lively football debate and not personal comments or ridiculous accusations in regards to teams commitees.

I think you should stop worrying about Urple mate and have a look at the thread "D grade give me something..." Your copping it there as well.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Not Jumping Ship Here At All Urple Hard To Jump From A Ship That Sunk Along Time Ago!!!!
Rumour Is Youll Be Joining Me On My New Ship The S.s Gibson. Next Year!
 
Not Jumping Ship Here At All Urple Hard To Jump From A Ship That Sunk Along Time Ago!!!!
Rumour Is Youll Be Joining Me On My New Ship The S.s Gibson. Next Year!
S.S.Gibson..... Very funny there Crazy Clint, did you think of that one while unplugging some toilet bowls this afternoon... By the way what is with you, using capitol letters at the start of every word...

Ship sunk along time ago.... Are you saying that a loyal Parade player like yourself was playing on a sinking ship and have finally jumped now that they have gone down to D grade. Surely after everyone has been bagging your skipper for allegedly jumping ship your not going to do the same....
 
URPLE stop trying to stir up trouble. That is all you have done on this site. You are alredy in enough strife over some of your alleged remarks you have made. Please leave the site and let people get back to talking about Football.
 
URPLE stop trying to stir up trouble. That is all you have done on this site. You are alredy in enough strife over some of your alleged remarks you have made. Please leave the site and let people get back to talking about Football.
Im in enough strife with who Thinker? This is a public forum and I can say what i like on it. People can still talk footy if they like, Im not stopping them.
 
Im in enough strife with who Thinker? This is a public forum and I can say what i like on it. People can still talk footy if they like, Im not stopping them.


Public forums are not a place for allegedly slanderous comments. It doesn't matter if it is a public forum or not , in the eyes of the law, it does not excuse slanderous comments. Action has been initiated.
 
Public forums are not a place for allegedly slanderous comments. It doesn't matter if it is a public forum or not , in the eyes of the law, it does not excuse slanderous comments. Action has been initiated.
Slanderous comments in regards to a clubs financial position, well if they are that worried about it. There must be some truth to it. As for action has been initiated, do really think Im worried about it. Doesnt bother me in the slightest. I think the boys at Parade spent more time worrying about their team then what is being said on a public forum, then their club wouldnt be in the situation as to what they are now, which is facing a double drop......
 
Public forums are not a place for allegedly slanderous comments. It doesn't matter if it is a public forum or not , in the eyes of the law, it does not excuse slanderous comments. Action has been initiated.

I'm no expert but I think you can only argue defamation if the said "slander" is actually not true. I think that the burden of proof of the falsity of a statement requires more than mere assertion that it's false.

In other words you can't be done for making slanderous comments if they are true... So I think I am safe with this one:

Thinker - I think you are a w @ nker!

Cheers
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Public forums are not a place for allegedly slanderous comments. It doesn't matter if it is a public forum or not , in the eyes of the law, it does not excuse slanderous comments. Action has been initiated.

Elaborate on your alleged action that has been initiated. I am interested as to what was considered slanderous....
 
Well, since slander is the spoken form of defamation, I see a fundamental flaw in your case...the legal eagles might have to hit the books a bit harder.
 
Some interesting info that has been passed around through private messages. Thanks boys. Isn't it interesting that the blokes who sit here slagging off at Parade are blokes who are low grade footballers that have nothing to do but slag their old club. Two of them who left Parade to play at lowly Ivanhoe because they could not get a game in the ones. One of them in fact struggled to get a game in the two's at Parade. I believe the boys used to call one of them Samboy behind his back because he has such a big chip on his shoulder. He strutted around like he owned the place but in fact was maybe the most overated player to play at Parade. He was a good junior footballer but couldn't cut it with the men so he ran to a lower grade where he was not exposed. The third is a hack who attended Parade and tries to build himself up by putting others down and is not well liked in any football circle. He feels the need to stir up trouble by hiding behind a key board and trying to be an assassin. Pretty tough doing that. Takes a lot of courage. We know who you all are and to be honest probably expect it from blokes who had to run and hide in a lower grade and then assinate the club you walked out on because you were not good enough to get a game. It is easy to blame a club for your own failings. Have a look at your own miserable careers and your lack of ability to face people as men. Keep running, keep hiding and keep typing rubbish. It only adds to our knowledge of what sort of insipid individuals you must be.
 
Thats two of the Ivanhoe boys and our country assassin. Tomorrow we will discuss the Diamond Valley connection
 
Well, since slander is the spoken form of defamation, I see a fundamental flaw in your case...the legal eagles might have to hit the books a bit harder.


You just worry about Yarra Valley and don't involve yourself in others issues.
 
Well, since slander is the spoken form of defamation, I see a fundamental flaw in your case...the legal eagles might have to hit the books a bit harder.


I suggest you update your law my friend. Changes to the law in 2006 abolished the difference between libel and slander. I really suggest you stay out of this one.

The general law has divided defamation into two categories - libel and slander. Libel is the publication of defamatory matter in permanent form, while slander is the publication of defamatory matter in non-permanent form. Something defamatory that is printed in a newspaper or book is libel, but the same thing, if spoken, is slander.

Since the introduction of the Defamation Act on 1st January 2006, the distinction between slander and libel is abolished and the publication of defamatory matter of any kind is actionable without proof of special damage.
 
I'm no expert but I think you can only argue defamation if the said "slander" is actually not true. I think that the burden of proof of the falsity of a statement requires more than mere assertion that it's false.

In other words you can't be done for making slanderous comments if they are true... So I think I am safe with this one:

Thinker - I think you are a w @ nker!


I look forward to catching up with you at Montmorency. You have never changed. It was once said about you that a Leopard doesn't change its spots. They were right. And please do us all a favour and don't think.
 
thank god someone got this thred back on track. Ugly was losing interest.

2007 will end up something like this:

Prahran 14/4 156.23%
BT 14/4 156.22%
hampton 12/6 122.33
oakleigh 10/8 111.21
Old ment 10/8 111.20 (missed finals by .01%)
Old Geelong 9/9
Peninsula 6/12
Therry 6/12
parade 3/13 and 2 draws
yarra 0/16 and 2 draws

Reasons - Love the Bullants and things shoud be ok there after a reasonable year last season (including beating all teams).
prahran, bloody lucky not to drop a grade WILL restock their list and with some handy players due back from OS will make for a powerful team. (and as much as I hate to admit it - a decent group of blokes both on and off the field)
hampton - havent seen since 2001 when they smashed us on the way to winning the C grade flag - 6 years is not enough time to have passed for them not to be a force in D1
Oakliegh - know nothing - but premier team generally has some momentum (Rupo)
Old mentone - get feel - will depend on VFL blokes. could make a run
Old Geelong - 50/50 here. could dominate or could struggle. depends on the snow
Peninsula - know nothing
Therry - if they win the close ones this year they will be in the ball game. seem to drop off a lot beyond best dozen of so
parade - no nothing - but hated them when I played against them in the early '90's in B grage- so why change now. (Bundy would be a very ordinary bloke to depart under these circumstances)
Yarra - rely very heavily on too few. depth a huge problem that I can't see being rectified. hope I am proved wrong here.

Dermot Dermot Dermot
why don't you stop sitting on the fence & actually make a prediction?
once again you've added nothing to the thread. hahaha
well done son. DG would have been proud to put Geeves' name to your post.
you got those beers on ice yet? I'm getting thirsty.
 
I'm no expert but I think you can only argue defamation if the said "slander" is actually not true. I think that the burden of proof of the falsity of a statement requires more than mere assertion that it's false.

In other words you can't be done for making slanderous comments if they are true... So I think I am safe with this one:

Thinker - I think you are a w @ nker!


I look forward to catching up with you at Montmorency. You have never changed. It was once said about you that a Leopard doesn't change its spots. They were right. And please do us all a favour and don't think.

Yes... that's right I'm like a Leopard.... I never change :confused:

I've always called w@ nkers what they are.

Look forward to the catch up too w @ nk ... I mean Thinker
 
This thread has about 1% of the class of last years. Geeves will not even log on he is that upset. Good luck to Parade in 07 i say. My spies have a different Spin "oso" on things down there. Numbers and talented youth are plentiful. The Raiders will not be doing any double drop.
Had a coffee this morning with an ex BT President and believe that they are a little worried about who will finally show and play. As neighbouring clubs are offering the dollars, there is a little bit of nervousness in regards to just whom will stay loyal. The next few weeks will be critical.

DG
 
spot on DG MAN, thread turned to crap with the addition of Parade people on it, and you not running the set up dosen't help either,

I am very confident you are winding up the BT people with your statement about who will turn up for the ants in 2007, it is well know that you don't like the ants and the ants dont like carey, but all in good fun.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top