CheapCharlie
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jun 12, 2015
- 6,416
- 7,992
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Thread starter
- #76
Why not separate it out to individual issues?
1. Roberts Smith wins a VC. DID he deserve it? Did he perform an act of valor?
There is no evidence to the contrary. The VC should be recognised for the rare award that it is.
2. War in Afghanistan and Iraq and war in general.
Opposition to war and Afghanistan and Iraq is fine, but it doesn't negate that the act of valor was committed and deserved.
3. Did Roberts Smith commit a crime of some type unrelated to his VC?
Quite possibly. No reason to lose the VC though as that action was seperate. If he did some crime there can be consequences for that.
4. Was he a suitable ambassador for some social issues?
In hindsight... maybe not
5. Did he enjoy the media attention and see a role for himself in the public sphere?
Yeah maybe. Nothing wrong with that. Plenty of military people mark out a public career after they leave the forces.
6. Has the government used him for PR reasons
Yes of course. It always happens.
7. Are the VC and other gallantry awards tainted or part of a military propaganda machine to garner support for conflicts?
They have been a well used tool in propaganda for a hundred years. Scrutiny is higher than ever now though... and there is always people looking for cracks in a story. Governments and military will spin what they can to win public support.
That still doesn't take away from acts of valor performed in war. You can have performed genuine bravery and deserve recognition... but the government can also seek to use that award as PR
1. Roberts Smith wins a VC. DID he deserve it? Did he perform an act of valor?
There is no evidence to the contrary. The VC should be recognised for the rare award that it is.
2. War in Afghanistan and Iraq and war in general.
Opposition to war and Afghanistan and Iraq is fine, but it doesn't negate that the act of valor was committed and deserved.
3. Did Roberts Smith commit a crime of some type unrelated to his VC?
Quite possibly. No reason to lose the VC though as that action was seperate. If he did some crime there can be consequences for that.
4. Was he a suitable ambassador for some social issues?
In hindsight... maybe not
5. Did he enjoy the media attention and see a role for himself in the public sphere?
Yeah maybe. Nothing wrong with that. Plenty of military people mark out a public career after they leave the forces.
6. Has the government used him for PR reasons
Yes of course. It always happens.
7. Are the VC and other gallantry awards tainted or part of a military propaganda machine to garner support for conflicts?
They have been a well used tool in propaganda for a hundred years. Scrutiny is higher than ever now though... and there is always people looking for cracks in a story. Governments and military will spin what they can to win public support.
That still doesn't take away from acts of valor performed in war. You can have performed genuine bravery and deserve recognition... but the government can also seek to use that award as PR