Votes for Round 19 V Melbourne

[DaBigC]

5....... A Mackie
4....... J Corey
3....... J Selwood
2....... C Ling
1....... M Blake

 

[GeeCats07]

5. Mackie
4. Selwood
3. Scarlett
2. Corey
1. Blake

 

[buzz123]

5. selwood
4. mackie
3. prismall
2. blake
1. harley

 

[Dez!]

It'd be easier to list the players you wouldn't give votes too.



Only be S.Johnson, C.Mooney and S.Byrnes from what I saw (which sadly was all of it).

 

[Tristagi]

ummm... wow it gets harder each week...

5 - Corey
4 - Selwood
3 - Enright
2 - Mackie
1 - Prismall

 

[canny30]

5 - Selwood
4 - Enright
3 - Scarlett
2 - Bartel
1 - Prismall

 

[crosby123]

5. Selwood
4. Mackie
3. Scarlett
2. Enright
1. Blake

Unlucky: Prismall, Corey, Kelly, Stokes

 

[Last Line Hero]

5. Selwood
4. Enright
3. Scarlett
2. Mackie
1. Corey

** Only gave Mackie the 2 votes because I hought his game was made great by the complete lack of opposition. Andrew played very well no doubt, but he zoned off a lot and pushed a kick ahead of the play regularly, I thought he sacrificed accountability a little bit and got away with it because the Dees were hopeless. Credit to him though, he capitalized and had a damaging night.

** The rucks were utterly dominant. I haven't seen them manhandle their opposition to that degree ever. Well done Otto and Blakey.

 

[FinalFive]

5: Mackie
4: Selwood
3: Enright
2: Scarlett
1: Stokes

 

[forrrestGump]

5. blake
4. byrnes
3. prismall
2. gamble
1. ling

 

[Gordons Cats]

5 J Corey
4 A Mackie
3 J Selwood
2 M Stokes
1 T Harley

 

[BigBadCam]

5. Blake
4. Byrnes
3. Prismall
2. Gamble
1. Ling

:d:d:d

 

[timmyhass]

5. Corey
4. Selwood
3. Mackie
2. Enright
1. Prismall

 

[noclashjumpers]

5. Mackie
4. Selwood
3. Ling
2. Enright
1. Prismall

 

[sarah.13]

5. Selwood
4. Enright
3. Mackie
2. Ling
1, Stokes.

 

[stokes_magic]

5. A, Mackie
4. J, Selwood
3. C, Enright
2. J, Corey
1.C, Ling