Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice WADA v Essendon 34: Guilty, 2 Yr Susp. (backdated to Mar 2015). Affects 17 current AFL plyrs.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

But why is he supporting Dank!

When this entire episode began, two members of the media were very quick to jump to the defence of Stephen Dank. One was Sam Newman, the other Graham Cornes, both men desperate to hang onto their long since gone youth, and people being supplied anti-ageing products from Dank.
 
So what's this thing about Bock.
Is it that Dank said they were hypocrites for not prosecuting him , because Dank knows he took it , even though ASADA in this case don't have enough evidence and Dank refuses to give any?
There's a thread on it with lots of info.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice WADA v Essendon 34: Guilty, 2 Yr Susp. (backdated to Mar 2015). Affects 17 current AFL plyrs.


Write your reply...

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top