We need a review into WA Footy to ensure it’s sustainability for 2021 and into lthe future.
Like the international economy, reforming our game should know no bounds. Like many, I believe 18 players is too many on the field and a cull is very achievable. Abolishing one or two half-flankers will reduce two to four players. This will also allow the argument for reduction in club (across all tiers) list sizes, at least in the short-term.
Most state leagues are in a fairly dire position. The WAFL is no exception to this rule. The WAFL’s evolution and purpose has changed since it commenced in 1885 - over 130 years ago. The league has gone from being highly competitive and one of the sport’s premier competitions to being effectively a reserves competition to West Coast and Fremantle. That mere fact will never change.
Given the league’s purpose has changed and the need to cut costs, there is no alternative but to abolish the WAFL reserves. When there was no national competition and WAFL was a premier league, the reserves were necessary. It’s purpose, in my view, upon the birth of the Eagles in a national competition, then changed. The game needs the WAFL colts and the league, but the reserves appears to be an unnecessary burden to WAFL clubs’ bottom line. WAFL clubs, like their AFL counterparts, could reduce their list sizes greatly, and it would go a long way to reducing match-day expenses. Those players would then filter back to the Perth Football League (and country footy), bolstering community footy.
Early days but we “can’t waste a crisis” and this is a seemingly obvious reform in my opinion.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Like the international economy, reforming our game should know no bounds. Like many, I believe 18 players is too many on the field and a cull is very achievable. Abolishing one or two half-flankers will reduce two to four players. This will also allow the argument for reduction in club (across all tiers) list sizes, at least in the short-term.
Most state leagues are in a fairly dire position. The WAFL is no exception to this rule. The WAFL’s evolution and purpose has changed since it commenced in 1885 - over 130 years ago. The league has gone from being highly competitive and one of the sport’s premier competitions to being effectively a reserves competition to West Coast and Fremantle. That mere fact will never change.
Given the league’s purpose has changed and the need to cut costs, there is no alternative but to abolish the WAFL reserves. When there was no national competition and WAFL was a premier league, the reserves were necessary. It’s purpose, in my view, upon the birth of the Eagles in a national competition, then changed. The game needs the WAFL colts and the league, but the reserves appears to be an unnecessary burden to WAFL clubs’ bottom line. WAFL clubs, like their AFL counterparts, could reduce their list sizes greatly, and it would go a long way to reducing match-day expenses. Those players would then filter back to the Perth Football League (and country footy), bolstering community footy.
Early days but we “can’t waste a crisis” and this is a seemingly obvious reform in my opinion.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com