Chad WinGOAT
Senior List
A mandated vaccine, which people were required to receive to restore their basic human rights has been removed from global use for being unsafe. If you think just AstraZenica was unsafe but the others were perfectly fine, then I have a vaccine I'd like to sell you. The mental gymnastics defending something that was objectively wrong is quite remarkable.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/busines...ne-worldwide-citing-surplus-of-newer-vaccines
Per the CDC website "Vaccine development often takes 10-15 years of laboratory research, usually at a company in private industry, but often involves collaboration with researchers at a university." But these took 6 months. By definition they were unsafe. The COVID-19 vaccines highlighted to many the shortcuts on safety that the medical industry take. When you mess up this big, it is standard practice to have industry or organisation level audits to understand what went wrong. How something so wrong was allowed to happen in the first place. During these audits, uncomfortable truths are discovered.
Source: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/basics...ten takes 10,with researchers at a university.
Forcing everyone to take an experimental treatment (yes, you were the experiment since it wasn't fully tested yet) is not justifiable when the primary risk target were the elderly. The median age for those who died from COVID-19 was 85.5 years. In 2022, the average life expectancy of Australians was 83.20 years.
Source: https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/cov... aged under 80 years,, 87.5 years for females).
If the vaccines were required to reduce emergency room intakes, then why have emergency room intakes increased since the introduction of the vaccine? Over time, the numbers have increased from 8.2 million in 2019–20 to 9.0 million in 2023–24. This isn't just from population increases either. Presentation rates per 1,000 population have also grown in this period – from 320 presentations per 1,000 people in 2019–20 to 333 presentations in 2023–24.
Source: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/myhospitals/intersection/activity/ed
It's worth noting, all of my sources are well established institutions, not crackpot theory underground banned websites.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/busines...ne-worldwide-citing-surplus-of-newer-vaccines
Per the CDC website "Vaccine development often takes 10-15 years of laboratory research, usually at a company in private industry, but often involves collaboration with researchers at a university." But these took 6 months. By definition they were unsafe. The COVID-19 vaccines highlighted to many the shortcuts on safety that the medical industry take. When you mess up this big, it is standard practice to have industry or organisation level audits to understand what went wrong. How something so wrong was allowed to happen in the first place. During these audits, uncomfortable truths are discovered.
Source: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/basics...ten takes 10,with researchers at a university.
Forcing everyone to take an experimental treatment (yes, you were the experiment since it wasn't fully tested yet) is not justifiable when the primary risk target were the elderly. The median age for those who died from COVID-19 was 85.5 years. In 2022, the average life expectancy of Australians was 83.20 years.
Source: https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/cov... aged under 80 years,, 87.5 years for females).
If the vaccines were required to reduce emergency room intakes, then why have emergency room intakes increased since the introduction of the vaccine? Over time, the numbers have increased from 8.2 million in 2019–20 to 9.0 million in 2023–24. This isn't just from population increases either. Presentation rates per 1,000 population have also grown in this period – from 320 presentations per 1,000 people in 2019–20 to 333 presentations in 2023–24.
Source: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/myhospitals/intersection/activity/ed
It's worth noting, all of my sources are well established institutions, not crackpot theory underground banned websites.
