- Banned
- #1
What would be more beneficial;
Doing weights for 20min 3 times a day or 1 hour session??
Hopefully someone can tell me. Thanks
Doing weights for 20min 3 times a day or 1 hour session??
Hopefully someone can tell me. Thanks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
What would be more beneficial;
Doing weights for 20min 3 times a day or 1 hour session??
Hopefully someone can tell me. Thanks
I think its more to do with the intensity of your work out than the time taken.
Yeah intensity can be important, if you are just trying to bulk up though you don't really have to be intense, just have to lift heavy weights. Intensity is more important in fitness training, whether that be cardio or muscle.
There is no way you will get much out of a 20 minute weight session though.
Roddy's post is extremely valid.
I've been bulking up considerably over the last two months or so, but I've been doing weights almost daily, one day of heavy weights, one day of a crap load of lighter weights until my arms literally can't do anymore, then repeat.
But I feel like I'm plateauing, I'm not noticing any extra definition really, nor any extra bulk - advice?
Some people reckon that getting enough sleep and rest away from the gym is as important as how hard you work out.
I do 3x50 min sessions a week....intensity is the keyI reckon if you put on 20 odd kilos and just walk around with it that should be enough of a work out
Sabre's right.
You've got to leave a day or so between each work out.
This is the time in which the muscle will build.
Not 100% true. Having adequate rest is important, but if you do your chest and triceps today, why not do your shoulders and legs tomorrow?