- Jun 19, 2016
- 21,198
- 41,001
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
You’d have the Geelong pick in the 30s as well.I doubt it.
We have 5 open list spots.
That would leave us with 1,20,72,77 +RD pick 1.
We would be better of keeping the 40s picks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
You’d have the Geelong pick in the 30s as well.I doubt it.
We have 5 open list spots.
That would leave us with 1,20,72,77 +RD pick 1.
We would be better of keeping the 40s picks.
Oh I thought you meant North got Geelong's f2nd.You’d have the Geelong pick in the 30s as well.
Nah we get that.Oh I thought you meant North got Geelong's f2nd.
The 30s pick would be great for us.
Only problem is that I think we can only use 5 picks to match and that would leave us a bit short might need to be a bit more shuffling.The trade would be
Geelong 30 + F2 > 23
North 42 + 47 > 30
WB 23 > F2 + 42 + 47
Is that true? My understanding is that the rule only limits how many live picks you can take to the draft. After that you can trade in and match with as picks as you want.Only problem is that I think we can only use 5 picks to match and that would leave us a bit short might need to be a bit more shuffling.
That was my understanding.Is that true? My understanding is that the rule only limits how many live picks you can take to the draft. After that you can trade in and match with as picks as you want.
You may be correct, like most AFL rules a clear explanation of how the bid matching process works is hard to find.That was my understanding.
Essentially North has paid the open list spot price for those picks.
So they are active.
this has most things. Its a confusing read though.You may be correct, like most AFL rules a clear explanation of how the bid matching process works is hard to find.
Maybe but seems like ridiculous overs for mine from a cats point of view. Trading up 7 spots in an even draft and throwing in our future 2nd which most likely is about 28-30 next year. We have a number of retirements next year and contract expires so doesn’t make sense to only have 1 pick before the mid 40s in 2022.The trade would be
Geelong 30 + F2 > 23
North 42 + 47 > 30
WB 23 > F2 + 42 + 47
I'd suggest 34 is more likely on the table than 30.Maybe but seems like ridiculous overs for mine from a cats point of view. Trading up 7 spots in an even draft and throwing in our future 2nd which most likely is about 28-30 next year. We have a number of retirements next year and contract expires so doesn’t make sense to only have 1 pick before the mid 40s in 2022.
More likely Carl’s future 3rd round pick which we hold
There's a sticky thread on the trade board called the FAQs and resources thread.You may be correct, like most AFL rules a clear explanation of how the bid matching process works is hard to find.
Most of the posts in that thread I mentioned are actually a combination of various AFL rules and parts of the CBA that relate to particular topics, which is supposed to make it easier to find what you want to know and less confusing too btw. Taylor and I went through it all a few years ago and we just keep updating and adding to it now to keep it current.this has most things. Its a confusing read though.
Yeah, probably. How about we split the difference and say 32.I'd suggest 34 is more likely on the table than 30.
View attachment 1286220
My best guess.
In that scenario.Geelong will give 32 and 34 not 30 and 34 but the rest is right.
Dogs might want roos future 3rd not 47 so they can use it to trade back in post bid.
If North are putting that much on the table we would be wanting 23.Geel Out: Pick 32(34) + Pick 34 (36)
Geel In: Pick 23(25) (WBD)
WBD Out: Pick 23(25)
WBD In: Pick 42 (North), Pick 47 (North), F3 (North)
North Out: Pick 42, Pick 47, F3
North In: Pick 32(34) + Pick 34(36)
Does this make sense
and 23 = 32 + 34If North are putting that much on the table we would be wanting 23.
We would just do the trade without Geelong.
42+47+f3.
=
23
The reason Geelong will be involved is because WB want their F2. If they were happy with our F3 they would just deal with us and cut out the Cats.and 23 = 32 + 34
Geelong are widely known to be getting 23 i understand... Not North
Geel Out: Pick 32(34) + Pick 34 (36)
Geel In: Pick 23(25) (WBD)
WBD Out: Pick 23(25)
WBD In: Pick 42 (North), Pick 47 (North), F3 (North)
North Out: Pick 42, Pick 47, F3
North In: Pick 32(34) + Pick 34(36)
Does this make sense
So what is the trade then?The reason Geelong will be involved is because WB want their F2. If they were happy with our F3 they would just deal with us and cut out the Cats.
North huge winners from this.Geel Out: Pick 32(34) + Pick 34 (36)
Geel In: Pick 23(25) (WBD)
WBD Out: Pick 23(25)
WBD In: Pick 42 (North), Pick 47 (North), F3 (North)
North Out: Pick 42, Pick 47, F3
North In: Pick 32(34) + Pick 34(36)
Does this make sense
North have already traded out our f2.So what is the trade then?
Geelong want dogs pick 23
North want to move up from 47 and 42
Geelongs F2 and Norths F3 in respect probably isnt seen that far off (Even though i personally see geelong falling and North Climbing so think it could potentially be upto 10 spots different
So what is the trade then?
Geelong want dogs pick 23
North want to move up from 47 and 42
Geelongs F2 and Norths F3 in respect probably isnt seen that far off (Even though i personally see geelong falling and North Climbing so think it could potentially be upto 10 spots different
So what is the trade then?
Geelong want dogs pick 23
North want to move up from 47 and 42
Geelongs F2 and Norths F3 in respect probably isnt seen that far off (Even though i personally see geelong falling and North Climbing so think it could potentially be upto 10 spots different