What would a Dutton Liberal leadership mean for the Liberals and the country?

Remove this Banner Ad

Which gets to the other side of the housing affordability crisis - the spiralling cost of rentals fuelled by the need for those with large residential housing investment portfolios to get a set ROI on their investments when the value of that portfolio is rapidly increasing.

Question: Under what circumstances does it make sense for taxpayers to subsidise this property speculation bubble to the detriment of the public good?

Answer - when the majority of State and Federal MPs are owners of residential property portfolios themselves and have an active and ongoing personal interest in maintaining the ponzi scheme.

Nearly 70 per cent of federal politicians own two or more properties, and a third own at least three, making MPs some of the country’s most prolific investors and much more likely to be a landlord than the average voter. Former SA Liberal Opposition Leader David Speirs, since resigned and facing drug supply charges, had a 13 property portfolio when in State Parliament , most of which were listed for short term lease on Airbnb.

Didn’t most of them have canberra property? Which they rented to each other in some nice cosy deal. Bipartisanship at **** finest
 
Which is precisely how the Libs want to play it. If they announced what they'd really planned on doing in office they'd never get close to it.

Morrison went full on ‘don’t mess with our super’ to get re elected…then put in much more ‘reform’ in that space then Chalmers is still trying to implement

So let’s not get too excited about labor scare campaigns

I’m not saying all morrison govt super reforms were a bad thing
 
18 May 2019 was one of the worst days in recent decades in Australia. It was the election that killed bold policy platforms for what I think will be a long time. And I should say that house prices would be at least 10% lower today - if not a lot more - had Labor won.
And today we learn this.


Better economic managers my fine trim arse.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Persisting with the referendum when it was DOA 2 months before the vote took place.

Too busy "rescuing" the Bali cohort rather than solving the cost of living crisis. Sure Albo can say he did rebates, but prices still rose to offset those rebates.

He'll claim that HE fixed inflation, when the RBA naturally decides to lower interest rates.


It's going to be single term Albo before long and that's what the inept politician deserves.

Cost of living or households not managing debt? Half this ****ing country is living beyond their means and somehow it's a government problem?!
 
Cost of living or households not managing debt? Half this ****ing country is living beyond their means and somehow it's a government problem?!
But why are they living beyond thier means?

House prices and rents are the problem
 
But why are they living beyond thier means?

House prices and rents are the problem
Yep unaffordable housing is a massive issue

10k people a month are becoming homeless right now I reckon that's something the government needs to take responsibility for
 
Name a couple
failing to (magically) fix the cost of living crisis and the housing issues - never mind that the issues are structural and product of years of poor taxation policy - and the LP complicit media quite happy to pile it on as all ALP fault (and conveniently omit that the LNP both contributed to it and also have NFI how to solve it)
 
Yep unaffordable housing is a massive issue

10k people a month are becoming homeless right now I reckon that's something the government needs to take responsibility for
well, i can tell you that the health system will not take responsibility for it. I see people who express mental health distress etc because they have no housing. THe only response I have is "sorry, cannot help you". The hospital system cannot be a housing of last resort - no matter what those who might call it an "extended duty of care" would say.
 
well, i can tell you that the health system will not take responsibility for it. I see people who express mental health distress etc because they have no housing. THe only response I have is "sorry, cannot help you". The hospital system cannot be a housing of last resort - no matter what those who might call it an "extended duty of care" would say.
Ok bro I don't remember asking you to fix it though
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

And in many ways the proposals weren't bold at all - the changes to negative gearing and capital gains taxes were not going to be retrospective and so the impact on existing home owners would be zero. But that is not the way it was painted in the press.

And don't get me started on the BS front page scare campaign over proposed changes resource royalties and to franking credits to fund increased funding to public education, welfare and a future NDIS:

View attachment 2196064
I thought they were not going to grandfather existing investment properties and the non retrospectiveness was just that they would not pursue retrospective tax debts for previous sales... SO it would encourage people to sell up during the period before laws were changed - in effect creating a buyers market and lowering prices
 
Perhaps the only way is to enact reform in office without announcing during an election campaign

While you could argue it's somewhat deceptive to the public, it can be a way of getting around Murdoch


Remember the front page attack ads when the Government amended the Stage 3 tax cuts after saying they wouldn't in the election campaign? No one gives a toss now because it was recognised as good policy but at the time it very nearly didn't happen.

The new real politik sees Murdoch and Stokes SevenWest media sending reporters to election press conferences armed to the teeth with coalition designed gotcha one liner questions that are designed to tie up any future Labor government with do nothing agendas. Ministers/Shadow Ministers refusing to give explicit answers to questions about what they will do in major policy areas immediately becomes a front page scare headline...e.g.:

'Minister X refuses to rule out scrapping/changing tax benefits for housing if re-elected - Millions of homeowners likely to lose hundreds of thousands off their home value'.

And it gets even worse on social media platforms - Facts and the Truth has no role to play in this stuff.

And NO Government is going to be elected with a majority in both houses in the near future. Heck the likelihood of a minority government is a strong likelihood in 2025 meaning any policy change requiring legislation will have to be negotiated with a swathe of independents with vastly differing policy perspectives. For every Pocock wanting to talk sense there's a Babet wanting to cause mayhem.
 
Remember the front page attack ads when the Government amended the Stage 3 tax cuts after saying they wouldn't in the election campaign? No one gives a toss now because it was recognised as good policy but at the time it very nearly didn't happen.

The new real politik sees Murdoch and Stokes SevenWest media sending reporters to election press conferences armed to the teeth with coalition designed gotcha one liner questions that are designed to tie up any future Labor government with do nothing agendas. Ministers/Shadow Ministers refusing to give explicit answers to questions about what they will do in major policy areas immediately becomes a front page scare headline...e.g.:

'Minister X refuses to rule out scrapping/changing tax benefits for housing if re-elected - Millions of homeowners likely to lose hundreds of thousands off their home value'.

And it gets even worse on social media platforms - Facts and the Truth has no role to play in this stuff.

And NO Government is going to be elected with a majority in both houses in the near future. Heck the likelihood of a minority government is a strong likelihood in 2025 meaning any policy change requiring legislation will have to be negotiated with a swathe of independents with vastly differing policy perspectives. For every Pocock wanting to talk sense there's a Babet wanting to cause mayhem.
As an aside, after seeing some of the dreadful behaviour of certain "journalists" at Albos press conferences at the last election, it wouldn't surprise if their brief involves causing disruption to give impression of chaos in the ALP camp v the respectful calmness of the LnP
 
As an aside, after seeing some of the dreadful behaviour of certain "journalists" at Albos press conferences at the last election, it wouldn't surprise if their brief involves causing disruption to give impression of chaos in the ALP camp v the respectful calmness of the LnP
Former Sky News and later Ten News political reporter Stela Todorovic instantly became the cover girl for every aspiring tabloid columnist in the country when she asked Albanese that gotcha question about the cash rate during the 2022 election campaign.

This is what we call good political 'journalism' in the 2020s and there will be more of it to come in this years election campaign.

But imho it's on political leaders to be able to be clear and consistent about what they stand for and to have the wit and passion to bat off such inane questions with ease by calling out the empty BS questions and getting the subject back on track to what matters.

Since becoming Opposition Leader in 2022, Dutton has only released details on ONE of his policy platforms - nuclear energy- and he has been absolutely destroyed by all but the Murdoch and Seven media outlets for its lack of accuracy and misleading statements. No chance he will make that mistake in coming months. It will be back to his identity politics and rhetoric. Let's see if the press hold him (and Albo) to account or go back to their old game playing gotcha nothingness.
 
Last edited:
Remember the front page attack ads when the Government amended the Stage 3 tax cuts after saying they wouldn't in the election campaign? No one gives a toss now because it was recognised as good policy but at the time it very nearly didn't happen.

The new real politik sees Murdoch and Stokes SevenWest media sending reporters to election press conferences armed to the teeth with coalition designed gotcha one liner questions that are designed to tie up any future Labor government with do nothing agendas. Ministers/Shadow Ministers refusing to give explicit answers to questions about what they will do in major policy areas immediately becomes a front page scare headline...e.g.:

'Minister X refuses to rule out scrapping/changing tax benefits for housing if re-elected - Millions of homeowners likely to lose hundreds of thousands off their home value'.

And it gets even worse on social media platforms - Facts and the Truth has no role to play in this stuff.

And NO Government is going to be elected with a majority in both houses in the near future. Heck the likelihood of a minority government is a strong likelihood in 2025 meaning any policy change requiring legislation will have to be negotiated with a swathe of independents with vastly differing policy perspectives. For every Pocock wanting to talk sense there's a Babet wanting to cause mayhem.


They want one term labor govts who do nothing but take all the blame for policy failure by conservatives over decades
 
They want one term labor govts who do nothing but take all the blame for policy failure by conservatives over decades
It's almost like some people in power (often the ones with umpteen flags behind them and their hands on their hearts) don't actually want a better Australia for the greatest number of Australians.
 
It's almost like some people in power (often the ones with umpteen flags behind them and their hands on their hearts) don't actually want a better Australia for the greatest number of Australians.
well, umpteen minus 2 (the ATSI flags)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

What would a Dutton Liberal leadership mean for the Liberals and the country?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top