Moved Thread Which 3... ?

Which three?

  • Hird-Voss-Buckley

    Votes: 80 74.8%
  • GABlett-Fyfe-Danger

    Votes: 27 25.2%

  • Total voters
    107

Remove this Banner Ad

Voss a better clearance player than all of them and one of the best leaders you will see play the game.
Hird was one of the more supremely skilled players i've seen
I always think Bucks belongs in a different group with Ricciutto and Harvey.
Carey should be included with Voss and Hird.

Anyways, i'd take the older trio.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Gets me thinking of the best 3 of the 90s before the hbv rise.
Williams - Harvey - Kelly ? Myb Hocking or Platten ?
 
Strange trio - Ablett isnt really the same generation hes 7-8 years older than the other two, why the comparison?

The first trio had constant comparisons throughout their careers bc they were all peaking at the same time. The 2nd trio dont really have a comparison rivalry as such

Agree about the generation, you could almost argue a third set of three to make it more about generation:

Hird, Voss, Buckley

Judd, Goodes, GAJ

Fyfe, Danger, Dusty

In that split i'd probably take the middle generation just slightly before the older guys.
The young group still have time to catch up though.
 
90's Trio: Hird, Voss, Buckley

00's Trio: Judd, Goodes, Ablett

10's Trio: Fyfe, Dangerfield, Martin

Not very good OP, this should be the discussion.

Would be interested to hear your reasoning for Goodes over Swan?

Particularly in a thread that is talking about midfield trio's.
This is not a discussion about the best footballers in each generation, otherwise Carey, Buddy, Pavlich and N. Riewoldt would all deserve mentions.
As an overall player, Goodes was clearly more versatile than Swan, but as a pure midfielder, I would take Swanny every day of the week.
 
90's Trio: Hird, Voss, Buckley

00's Trio: Judd, Goodes, Ablett

10's Trio: Fyfe, Dangerfield, Martin

Not very good OP, this should be the discussion.
I'd have Buddy ahead of Goodes
Every bit as good as Judd and Ablett in full flight.

I also think Carey should be in with Hird and Voss.
Bucks was consistently good, and he was a good game breaker at times. But i don't think he was on the level of Voss and Hird, whereas Carey was dominant during a similar period, and arguably ahead of both.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I'd have Buddy ahead of Goodes
Every bit as good as Judd and Ablett in full flight.

I also think Carey should be in with Hird and Voss.
Bucks was consistently good, and he was a good game breaker at times. But i don't think he was on the level of Voss and Hird, whereas Carey was dominant during a similar period, and arguably ahead of both.
Fair enough, was just picking the 3 dominant midfielders.

Even so, Bud sort of was accross the eras. He was great in the tail end of the 00's, and it just extended to now lol.
 
Would be interested to hear your reasoning for Goodes over Swan?

Particularly in a thread that is talking about midfield trio's.
This is not a discussion about the best footballers in each generation, otherwise Carey, Buddy, Pavlich and N. Riewoldt would all deserve mentions.
As an overall player, Goodes was clearly more versatile than Swan, but as a pure midfielder, I would take Swanny every day of the week.
Swan a gun too and you're right he's a more pure midfielder than Goodes. Just picked Goodes as he fit the 00's better.

Swan's best years were in the 10's (only made AA once in the 00's)
 
I'm happy to admit I never rated Hird.

Wasn't quick, wasn't big (he was tall for a midfielder back then), used to kick mung punts all the time, certainly wasn't a beautiful kick.

He had intangibles to be sure, could play multiple positions, was big in big games.

However, pure footballing ability, I think someone like Nathan Fyfe is well ahead of him. Athletically there is no comparison, I think if Fyfe played in the early 90's he's a CHF in the ilk of Carey.


I think Buckley is servery underrated in these comparisons, he played in truly shit sides for 80% of his career, was an offensive juggernaut for most of his career. Quick, powerful and one of the best kicks of all time, routinely destroyed teams with very little support.


I'm surprised Riccuito isn't in here, go back and watch his state games from the early 90's when he was a pup. Hard as nails, used to serve it right up to some absolute greats like Williams etc
 
I'm happy to admit I never rated Hird.

Wasn't quick, wasn't big (he was tall for a midfielder back then), used to kick mung punts all the time, certainly wasn't a beautiful kick.

He had intangibles to be sure, could play multiple positions, was big in big games.

However, pure footballing ability, I think someone like Nathan Fyfe is well ahead of him.


I think Buckley is servery underrated in these comparisons, he played in truly shit sides for 80% of his career, was an offensive juggernaut for most of his career. Quick, powerful and one of the best kicks of all time, routinely destroyed teams with very little support.
????
Baffling.
 
????
Baffling.

Is it?

I watched his career from start to finish, he certainly isn't in Buckley or GAJ's class by foot from within these lists.

He's much more in the Fyfe/Dangerfield level imo.
 
OP should put down the pipe, Mark Ricciuto comes before Hird in that era and Nat Fyfe is out of his depth too.

Should be
Ricciuto/Buckley/Voss
V
Ablett//Danger/Martin

And i'd take Roo/Bucks and Vossy over the other three purely because a midield matchup would see the second trio carried off on stretchers.
 
never rated hird either. found him to be overrated and a guy who spent a lot of time forward of centre cherry picking.

also agree on his kicking being sub-par. had a high ball drop which went to shit sometimes.
 
We love a comparison:

Hird-Voss-Buckley

vs

GABlett-Fyfe-Danger

Would would you pick and why?

as players

Hird, Voss and Buckley could all kick straight. I love danger and Fyfe but their kicking let's them down

as coaches

Although untried, Ablett, Fyfe and danger couldn't possibly do a worse job than the old guard. Thus they would get the nod.
 
For all the Hird haters, who do you have in front of him from that era?

I'm not a hater, I just don't think he's in the top 2-3 midfielders of the last 30 years like some are proclaiming in here.

I have Robert Harvey in front of him as well, Harvey was ****ing untouchable in 97 & 98. He was the best midfielder in the game in the late 90's, so overlooked because of his lower profile, hated the media etc.

I have Hird more in the Crawford level personally, which I know most will disagree with. Just my personal opinion.

Hird had an incredible support cast for most of his career. Misiti and Johnson did most of the heavy lifting in the later teams.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Moved Thread Which 3... ?

Back
Top