Which is worse? Carlton's new marketing campaing or iSnack 2.0?

Which is worse?

  • Carlton's new marketing campaign

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • iSnack 2.0

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Remove this Banner Ad

Jan 7, 2005
61,871
70,282
Down the rabbit hole
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Fatebringer
pretty simple one really.

I thought iSnack 2.0 was easily the worst marketing decision ever made, but now I'm not so sure.

I really can't decide. Can you help me?

Which is the worse marketing decision? This:

mship-f-cover-246-2.jpg


Or this:

420isnack-420x0.jpg


???
 
It's smells shithouse whatever the Carltank are cooking....
..and fancy putting a dirty eye gouging prick on the front of your poster. Way to sell the club :rolleyes:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

At least Kraft had the good sense to realise iSnack 2.0 was a shithouse idea and abandon it.

Carlton will no doubt stick with their debacle of a campaign, as they did last year when it was obvious to everyone else they'd come far too early.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Hahaha.. Carltons is much worse.. seeing as the Vegemite isnack was probably the best marketing decision in the last 5 years. Wether they meant it or not. The sheer stupidity of the name gave them 10mil of free advertising, and its selling by the truckloads.

So yeah.. carlton:thumbsu:
 
I picked isnack 2.0 as it's the worst name in the history of food.
Carlton's may be lame but at least it's different.

Different how? Because ripping off a decade old pro wrestling catchphrase is different (better) than ripping off a current and relevant trademark?
 
WTF does that even mean?


They are "cooking up" a Magpie and a Bombre.

Maybe they should set their sights a little higher than their "traditional rivals".
 
haha i thought it was the actual poster.

well done.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Which is worse? Carlton's new marketing campaing or iSnack 2.0?

Back
Top