- Banned
- #26
Think quite a few on this thread have hit the nail on the head. Do you go for Dal Santo - because Ling is more likely to cut out his effectiveness, or Hayes, who is, IMO, going to be harder to tag and lessen his impact on the game ?
Hayes has more grunt and Dal Santo is the better deliverer of the ball into forward line.
It will be easier, I would think, for Ling to tag someone on a very wet day. Is the importance of a real up and under player like Hayes more important on a rain soaked field - or will Dal Santos possessions hurt more if they start hitting Riewoldt's or Kosi's chest ?
Its is a line ball call. Go conservative and tag Dal Santo - who Ling has done well on, or be a bit different and put him Hayes ?
I was initially going for the Hayes tag - but after reading all the posts - I am undecided. I just hope if one of them get off the leash Thompson will be willing to change the original tag/game plan. Hayes in the last quarter, with Riewoldt, got them over the line against the Doggies.
Hayes has more grunt and Dal Santo is the better deliverer of the ball into forward line.
It will be easier, I would think, for Ling to tag someone on a very wet day. Is the importance of a real up and under player like Hayes more important on a rain soaked field - or will Dal Santos possessions hurt more if they start hitting Riewoldt's or Kosi's chest ?
Its is a line ball call. Go conservative and tag Dal Santo - who Ling has done well on, or be a bit different and put him Hayes ?
I was initially going for the Hayes tag - but after reading all the posts - I am undecided. I just hope if one of them get off the leash Thompson will be willing to change the original tag/game plan. Hayes in the last quarter, with Riewoldt, got them over the line against the Doggies.
