Society/Culture Why are young males now more right wing then older males?

Remove this Banner Ad

I watched a Bee Gees documentary recently and thought of Joe Rogan and this thread.

The woke sux movement is really similar to the disco sux movement of the late 70s.

A Chicago DJ called Steve Dahl helped to whip people up into rebelling against Disco culture to favour the more traditional masculinity of rock, which didn't have the same connections with blacks and homosexuality. Lots of other conservative morality groups were rising at the same time.

"Reverend Jerry Falwell founded the Moral Majority, a conservative evangelical lobbying group. "White males, eighteen to thirty-four are the most likely to see disco as the product of homosexuals, blacks, and Latins," Marsh wrote, "and therefore they're the most likely to respond to appeals to wipe out such threats to their security."

 
Last edited:
The left especially in Melbourne are insufferable

Hating everything especially your country is “cool”

People are over it. The world’s a worse place because of woke lefties.
As far as social harmony goes, all us lefties want is a world where everyone is respected regardless. Your skin colour is not an issue. Your beliefs, providing they are not detrimental to others, are not an issue. Your perception of sex and gender are not an issue. How you dress and what music you listen to are not an issue.

Once you stop caring about these current points of division, you will find a great many societal issues will just cease to exist.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The fringe left you're talking about are very very minuscule in number.
At the last state election 15% of the population voted for the greens, socialst party and other fringe left parties.

That is before you look at other populations of society that engage in voilence during their protests.

1/6th of the population cannot be considering minuscule.
 
At the last state election 15% of the population voted for the greens, socialst party and other fringe left parties.

That is before you look at other populations of society that engage in voilence during their protests.

1/6th of the population cannot be considering minuscule.
Yes. It's important to understand that every greens voter is a hated filled woke trying to encourage our kids to identify as cats. And every liberal voter is a white supremacist wanting to bring back gay bashing. I can send you a heap of links that proves it.
 
Last edited:
As far as social harmony goes, all us lefties want is a world where everyone is respected regardless. Your skin colour is not an issue. Your beliefs, providing they are not detrimental to others, are not an issue. Your perception of sex and gender are not an issue. How you dress and what music you listen to are not an issue.

Once you stop caring about these current points of division, you will find a great many societal issues will just cease to exist.
Impressive you’ve achieved the opposite.
 
Australian politics are at an all time low. Dutton and Albo are the worst candidates I think we have ever had.

Certainly no Dutton fan.
I can't see why you wouldn't support Dutton tbh, most of your positions align pretty closely to what he's offering.
 
The left especially in Melbourne are insufferable

Hating everything especially your country is “cool”

People are over it. The world’s a worse place because of woke lefties.
What, specifically, have the woke lefties done to make the world a worse place in an objective sense?
 
It's pretty wild to me for anyone to suggest that grown adults act in any matter just so they appear "cool". I don't know a single grown friggen adult who gives a shit about being "cool".

It's such a lazy, reductive argument typically made by people too lazy or stupid to understand the issues.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Have you tasted soy milk?

Plus there's the huge numbers who identify as cats and crap in kitty litter. I personally know 8,763 kitty litter crappers.
I'm not going to tell you to stop it so much as I'm going to ask you to refrain until 10571z answers.

Give them the chance to support their argument with something they consider rational. It's only worthy of dismissal if they can't do it.

The floor's yours, 10571z. In what way have woke lefties made the world a worse place, objectively?
 
I'm not going to tell you to stop it so much as I'm going to ask you to refrain until 10571z answers.

Give them the chance to support their argument with something they consider rational. It's only worthy of dismissal if they can't do it.

The floor's yours, 10571z. In what way have woke lefties made the world a worse place, objectively?
Division, over sensitivity and censorship, cancel culture, Identity politics, victim mentality, soft stances on crime..

Why do you think right wing politics are making comebacks around the world?
 
Why do you think right wing politics are making comebacks around the world?

What do you think the last 32 pages of discussion have been about you flog?
 
Yes. It's important to understand that every greens voter is a hated filled woke trying to encourage our kids to identify as cats. And every liberal voter is a white supremacist wanting to bring back gay bashing. I can send you a heap of links that proves it.
You are very confused about your politics.

The greens are a far left party that have talked about their policy desires to defund financial institutions unless they they agree uniformly with their policies. In other words no business gets a loan unless the greens party approve you.

Their policy on their website to name one of hundreds of extremist policies is:
Elections of boards of publicly listed companies are to be conducted by an independent statutory body.
The independant statutory body is required to independently audit the company and publicly report their performance against economic, environmental and social criteria on an annual basis.

layman's terms: Any corporation that is publicly listed must appoint directors/executives that align with the greens party's policies or you will be defunded. Ofcourse when your hierarchical structure is appointed aligning with their world views, then no employee would be employed unless they simialarly held those views.

The liberal party in Australia is a centre right party.
A liberal voter in any other country is centre left.
A typical liberal voter in the united states would be: a supporter of policies that are socially progressive and promote social welfare.

You should read my post on the page 31 that talks about extremism in both the left and right of politics.
Liberal voters in Australia or around the world (despite their counter views) are not the problem.

The greens parties around the world are a problem because their agenda is nothing to do with climate change and more about ensuring everyone "shares" their world view or be defunded.
 
... is a subjective characterisation, that doesn't hold up any real weight when assessed objectively.
over sensitivity and censorship
Are behaviours exhibited by both the left and right, which can be demonstrated factually.
cancel culture
... is an urge old as time, and is not a behaviour isolated to the left, either.
Identity politics
This one's a joke.

The right have eternally been about identity; who you are, where you sit within hierarchies seen as natural. The right created hierarchies of races to justify their treatment of non-whites (and other groups, in non white parts of the world); created hierarchies of class seen as natural, with the king and aristocracy at the apex. The way the right treats the wealthy classes - obsequiously - based entirely on who they are; the way the right treats people seen as lower on the hierarchies - such as how they treat unions - when they seek and achieve political power.

The right have always played identity politics. They're only getting a bit up and angsty about it because progressives are shooing in on their game.
victim mentality
This is a subjective judgement, not an objective characterisation.
soft stances on crime..
This is - again - completely subjective.
Why do you think right wing politics are making comebacks around the world?
Easier marketing, less censors, easier dissemination of information since the internet.

This is pretty easily demonstrable. It takes years for the full effects of a communication medium to truly be felt; before the internet, right wing groups were isolated and their ability to grow and spread ideas was as good as the best propagandist within each individual group. They couldn't publish in the newspapers, use radio or TV to disseminate their views or to recruit, because editors refused to air certain things. Now, the right can see which methods and ideas work and which don't, and this has allowed them to hone in on strategies which allow them to get their views out there. Some of these strategies are argumentative - ways to win arguments with the left, because they lost an awful lot of them over the past 100 or so years after centuries of winning because they were the ones with the swords - and some of these strategies are marketing: use of outrage to garner views and clicks, clever use of algorithms and funding to prop up specific viewpoints, the deliberate coating of their arguments in a veneer of libertarianism to provide plausible deniability and the revamping of conservativism as centrism.

See, the various RW groups seeking to replicate Trump's methods, including our very own Scott Morrison and Peter Dutton. The consistent 'Make (insert whatever) Great Again', as though that slogan was originally Trump's.

So - to summarise - you have a series of claims which are mostly subjective, and those which aren't are incorrect. Indeed, you might have misunderstood what you were being asked to do: to be asked to prove something objectively is to demonstrate that it is true beyond opinion. Something that is subjective - such as how you feel about something - might be shared between multiple people - such as how you feel the left is soft on crime - is something that arises from your own personal experiences, something that is not able to be demonstrated with fact or cannot be proven beyond it being what you think or feel.

Do you see where you might be going wrong now, 10571z?
 
Last edited:
... is a subjective characterisation, that doesn't hold up any real weight when assessed objectively.

Are behaviours exhibited by both the left and right, which can be demonstrated factually.

... is an urge old as time, and is not a behaviour isolated to the left, either.

This one's a joke.

The right have eternally been about identity; who you are, where you sit within hierarchies seen as natural. The right created hierarchies of races to justify their treatment of non-whites (and other groups, in non white parts of the world); created hierarchies of class seen as natural, with the king and aristocracy at the apex. The way the right treats the wealthy classes - obsequiously - based entirely on who they are; the way the right treats people seen as lower on the hierarchies - such as how they treat unions - when they seek and achieve political power.

The right have always played identity politics. They're only getting a bit up and angsty about it because progressives are shooing in on their game.

This is a subjective judgement, not an objective characterisation.

This is - again - completely subjective.

Easier marketing, less censors, easier dissemination of information since the internet.

This is pretty easily demonstrable. It takes years for the full effects of a communication medium to truly be felt; before the internet, right wing groups were isolated and their ability to grow and spread ideas was as good as the best propagandist within each individual group. They couldn't publish in the newspapers, use radio or TV to disseminate their views or to recruit, because editors refused to air certain things. Now, the right can see which methods and ideas work and which don't, and this has allowed them to hone in on strategies which allow them to get their views out there. Some of these strategies are argumentative - ways to win arguments with the left, because they lost an awful lot of them over the past 100 or so years after centuries of winning because they were the ones with the swords - and some of these strategies are marketing: use of outrage to garner views and clicks, clever use of algorithms and funding to prop up specific viewpoints, the deliberate coating of their arguments in a veneer of libertarianism to provide plausible deniability and the revamping of conservativism as centrism.

See, the various RW groups seeking to replicate Trump's methods, including our very own Scott Morrison and Peter Dutton. The consistent 'Make (insert whatever) Great Again', as though that slogan was originally Trump's.

So - to summarise - you have a series of claims which are mostly subjective, and those which aren't are incorrect. Indeed, you might have misunderstood what you were being asked to do: to be asked to prove something objectively is to demonstrate that it is true beyond opinion. Something that is subjective - such as how you feel about something - might be shared between multiple people - such as how you feel the left is soft on crime - is something that arises from your own personal experiences, something that is not able to be demonstrated with fact or cannot be proven beyond it being what you think or feel.

Do you see where you might be going wrong now, 10571z?
Your claims are subjective as well. There is full proof evidence to either argument.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Society/Culture Why are young males now more right wing then older males?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top