Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd consider it an educated opinion.Is that merely an opinion or an educated opinion?
I disagree that it's the primary cause for current inflationary pressures.I thought money printing during covid was common knowledge. Do you disagree?
Just a misinterpretation then, all good.Did I stutter?
The government reflects the voters. What does that say about us?Shouldn’t the government be prudent?
Is that merely an opinion or an educated opinion?
I thought money printing during covid was common knowledge. Do you disagree?
Did I stutter?
The government reflects the voters. What does that say about us?
Personal responsibility. Kids go to school, healthy adults go to work, and those who are at risk protect themselves with government support. That's how covid should have been dealt with.So your answer to the pandemic is another episode of Hunger Games?
You have a mortgage, yes?My suggestion is far from being selfish … I don’t have a big mortgage….. I just hate the banks and the current banking system.
Banks win…
Home owners made a killing over the pandemic. **** them and me!What about those who have made massive profits off the back of the stimulus from the pandemic….
Wouldn't the more appropriate way of looking at it be that Nut wants everyone in our society to share the burden equally? Rather than just those with a homeloan? That seems selfless rather than selfish.
What policies are you referring to that caused runaway inflation? And once you've explained them, can you outline how you think only those with a mortgage contributed to/supported them?
Personal responsibility. Kids go to school, healthy adults go to work, and those who are at risk protect themselves with government support. That's how covid should have been dealt with.
You have a mortgage, yes?
Home owners made a killing over the pandemic. * them and me!
re the first, it is unknown how that would have played out, though we did see some trend from what happened in the UK - overwhelmed health system, large abseenteeism - insufficient workers left to actually work - and they ended up locking down anyway. And the "at risk population" by definition was more than 50% of the population (in that overweight/ obese is a risk factor)Personal responsibility. Kids go to school, healthy adults go to work, and those who are at risk protect themselves with government support. That's how covid should have been dealt with.
You have a mortgage, yes?
Home owners made a killing over the pandemic. * them and me!
Do you think that provides justification for 2 years of Melbourne lockdown?re the first, it is unknown how that would have played out, though we did see some trend from what happened in the UK - overwhelmed health system, large abseenteeism - insufficient workers left to actually work - and they ended up locking down anyway.
That's a very loose definition you're running with.And the "at risk population" by definition was more than 50% of the population (in that overweight/ obese is a risk factor)
That had the smell of obvious bullshit to me.Add in the initial reports of a 10% hospital case fatality rate (from the initial Chinese reports) - essentially fears of the death rate of SARS + transmissibility of common cold...
My preference is to see the most over-leveraged people pay for their arrogance.Shouldn’t those you benefited the most pay down the most debt?
much of the lockdown extension was forced by the other states arseing their way to covid zero, so we had to get to zero to be able to reopen borders with other states.Do you think that provides justification for 2 years of Melbourne lockdown?
That's a very loose definition you're running with.
That had the smell of obvious bullshit to me.
NSW used a different approach, with success for the most part.much of the lockdown extension was forced by the other states arseing their way to covid zero, so we had to get to zero to be able to reopen borders with other states.
At risk doesn't mean much when the level of risk is low.that "loose definition" like it or not is the true definition of the people who are at risk.
No, but I do have a BS and over 20 years experience in scientific fields.I'm fairly sure you don't have a medical background.
Life experience.So I don't know how you could tell that it was "obvious bullshit" - particularly when those are the only available figures, and government would be cursed for inaction (at federal and state levels)
Disagree.could it have been better - undoubtedly
but could they have made a better choice with the information available and the potential consequences of being wrong - I don't think they could have
NSW also arsed their way to covid zero. All states went into lockdowns from March to approx May/ June 2020. THe other states got to zero. We did not. So they were all able to remove restrictions. Then they mocked us and closed borders to us (victorians) as we posed unacceptable risks. So we had a choice - stay as our own internal "country" or try to achieve covid zero to rejoin the country. Those were our options at the time.NSW used a different approach, with success for the most part.
At risk doesn't mean much when the level of risk is low.
No, but I do have a BS and over 20 years experience in scientific fields.
Life experience.
Disagree.
Are you referring to how it’s paid down ?It’s a good idea …. But what about the national debt?
Rising inflation creates bracket creep. When you have rising inflation you lower income taxes not increase them to remove the impacts of bracket Creep.The Covid stimulus is regarded as the main driver of inflation. Our national debt increased by 300 million.
The answer at the moment is simply to increase interest rates to combat inflation and push unemployment up… . banks are licking their lips.
Why?
Why punish a third of the population who have mortgages? Why punish Business and cause job losses?
Why not spread the burden and increase taxes on those that can afford it? Those that are benefiting the most from inflation…
You have been told previously that government debt doesnt actually exist. Its made up. left wingers know this. Its only right wingers who want to pretend that government debt is a real thing.Shouldn’t the government be prudent?
Debt is only important to right wingers when they aren't in government.You have been told previously that government debt doesnt actually exist. Its made up. left wingers know this. Its only right wingers who want to pretend that government debt is a real thing.
Workers who cant afford the interest rate should never have invested. No one forced them to borrow. Nominal rates arent even high by historical standards. They are still quite low. And real rates are negative.The forced savings model proposed whereby the workforce population is forced to increase their superannuation to combat inflation instead of making workers who can’t afford the rate hikes suffer and making the banks richer , intrigued me .
I’m sure there are pros and cons but hard to fault the logic .
The current system is so broken , archaic and corrupt
Very True. Government debt is irrelevant on its own.Debt is only important to right wingers when they aren't in government.
They took the advice of the head of the RBA who said we wouldn't see interest rate rises until 2024 and planned accordingly.Workers who cant afford the interest rate should never have invested. No one forced them to borrow. Nominal rates arent even high by historical standards. They are still quite low. And real rates are negative.
Increasing interest rates immediately reduces the supply of money and the velocity of money. Raising taxes does neither, unless the government uses it pay down debt, which as we all know, they won’t.Oh, this is another right wing are less intelligent threads is it?
Well played nut you got them responding without even making the thread title controversial.
But It would be great if we had more than one lever to pull for inflation. Be interesting what happens if the new RBA structure goes through.
.
Anyone who did that was a moron. I took that as a signal to fix my interest rates for four years in 2021, because i know the RBA’s ability to forecast is a joke.They took the advice of the head of the RBA who said we wouldn't see interest rate rises until 2024 and planned accordingly.
You can mount the alternate argument for left-leaners when they are in government.Debt is only important to right wingers when they aren't in government.