- Thread starter
- #126
Your an idiot. Geelong had 2 more scoring shots, their kicking was far from terrible in that game, Adelaide were just better. North had the same amount of scoring shots as Adelaide.
If Port had of kicked 14 straight and Geelong had of kicked 6.37 Port would have 2 flags.
So it wasn't Geelong's bad kicking that cost them the 97 final (we wont bring up Colbert's non-mark).
Was it your bad kicking that cost you in the last two weeks?